Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Woodard & Curran Foundation

Woodard & Curran Foundation engages the passion of the Woodard & Curran community to support nonprofit organizations that protect our water and environment.

$191k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Environment$1.3MFood & Nutrition$130kEducation$60kCommunity Improvement$20kYouth Development$10kAnimals$10kEmployment$10kPhilanthropy$10k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Drylands Agroecology Ressearch Foundation$75,000
To Nizhoni Ani$75,000
Western Pennsylvania Conservancy$10,000
Save Barnegat Bay$10,000
Maine Coast Heritage Trust$10,000
Family Summits$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Somali Bantu Community Association: $10k → 13%Water Education for Latino Leaders: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
MT
MN
NY
MA
PA
NJ
RI
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
DC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 16 repeat orgs$375k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
35

Total granted

$1.2M
$345k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+31%

Still filing today

100%
94%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationFood & NutritionAnimalsPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DA
    Drylands Agroecology Research Foundation
    2× · 2022–2025 · $175k · revenue +37%
  • CHANGE IS SIMPLE INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $125k · revenue +101%
  • LF
    Literacy for Environmental Justice
    3× · 2017–2019 · $100k · revenue +91%

Funded once

  • BL
    Brunswick-Topsham Land Trust Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +5%
  • SM
    SUSTAINABLE MAPLE SHADE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • TS
    The San Diego River Park Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +45%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Midcoast Conservancy

The mission of Midcoast Conservancy is to protect vital lands and waters on a scale that matters and to inspire wonder and action on behalf of all species and the Earth.

Environment
2
Wetlands Foundation
Environment
3
Royal River Conservation Trust

The royal river conservation trust (rrct) is a regional land trust working primarily in seven maine municipalities. the trust owns,cares for, and stewards land and conservation easements to protect land and water resources for the general…

Environment
4
Sudbury Valley Trustees Inc

Sudbury valley trustees, inc. ("the organization") works to protect natural areas and farmland for wildlife and people in the 36 communities that surround the sudbury, assabet, and concord rivers. the organization cares for some of the…

Environment
5
Sebasticook Regional Land Trust

The mission of the SRLT is to recognize and conserve the rich wild and workinglandscape of Central Maine's Sebasticook River watershed through conservation,stewardship and education. Our focal programs are land conservation for…

Environment
6
Wildlands Trust Inc

The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…

Environment
7
Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council

The Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council is a local nonprofit organization that strives to enhance and restore habitat for fish and wildlife our community and for future generations. Our Board of Directors consists of seven members with…

Environment
8
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
9
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
10
Kennebec Estuary Land Trust

The mission of the Kennebec Estuary Land Trust is to conserve, restore, and instill appreciation of the land and water resources of the Kennebec Estuary for the benefit of today's communities and future generations.

Environment
11
Maine Appalachian Trail Land Trust

To preserve and protect land surrounding the appalachian trail in maine for public benefit.

Environment
12
Presumpscot Regional Land Trust

We engage with communities to conserve, steward, and provide access to local lands and clean water for current and future generations to enjoy.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Open Space Institute Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sustainable Maple Shade Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLocal Food System Organizat…Community FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Immigrant Worker SupportCommunity College Foundatio…Women & Girls Leadership De…Christian Missionary Organi…Policy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%31%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%12%5–10yr19%37%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr16%17%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/54
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,511

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
52/53
Grantees still filing
35/53
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHANGE IS SIMPLE INC — $125,000 · EnvironmentCHANGE IS SIMPLE INCOCEAN RESEARCH PROJECT INC — $110,000 · EnvironmentOCEAN RESEARCH PROJECT INCFRIENDS OF CASCO BAY — $100,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF CASCO BAYTURTLE ISLAND RESTORATION NETWORK — $60,000 · EnvironmentTURTLE ISLAND RESTORATION NETWORKOPEN SPACE INSTITUTE INC — $40,000 · EnvironmentOPEN SPACE INSTITUTE INC+22 more — $240,000 · Environment+22 moreTO NIZHONI ANI — $115,000 · EducationTO NIZHONI ANISAINT FRANCIS UNIVERSITY — $100,000 · EducationSAINT FRANCIS UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION & ALUMNI ENGAGEMENT — $66,666 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLA…X-CEL INC — $30,000 · EducationX-CEL INCTechbridge Girls — $20,000 · EducationTechbridge Girls+1 more — $10,000 · EducationDrylands Agroecology Research Foundation — $175,000 · Food & NutritionDrylands Agroe…Maine Farmland Trust — $10,000 · Food & NutritionMILL CITY GROWS INC — $10,000 · Food & NutritionLiteracy for Environmental Justice — $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentBLUE SKY FUND — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentRIDGE TO REEFS INC — $100,000 · InternationalTree Trust — $10,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF SCARBOROUGH MARSH — $10,000 · OtherCITIZENS ASSOCIATION OF LIBERTY L AKES INC — $10,000 · OtherNORTHWEST FLORIDA STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · OtherHEART OF BIDDEFORD — $20,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES CLEANTECH INCUBATOR — $5,000 · OtherFLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERISTY FINANCING CORP — $10,000 · OtherWolfe's Neck Farm Foundation — $10,000 · OtherWATER EDUCATION FOR LATINO LEADERS — $10,000 · OtherSomali Bantu Community Association of Maine — $10,000 · OtherThe San Diego River Park Foundation — $10,000 · OtherLEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE — $10,000 · OtherGULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $10,000 · AnimalsWildlife Heritage Foundation of New Hampshire — $10,000 · AnimalsFAMILY SUMMITS INC — $10,000 · Animals
Environment$675,000Education$341,666Food & Nutrition$195,000Youth Development$110,000International$100,000Other$125,000Animals$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDrylands Agroecology Research Foundation — $175,000 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetCHANGE IS SIMPLE INC — $125,000 over 6y, 5.2% of budgetTO NIZHONI ANI — $115,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetOCEAN RESEARCH PROJECT INC — $110,000 over 2y, 54% of budgetLiteracy for Environmental Justice — $100,000 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetSAINT FRANCIS UNIVERSITY — $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRIDGE TO REEFS INC — $100,000 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF CASCO BAY — $100,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION & ALUMNI ENGAGEMENT — $66,666 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTURTLE ISLAND RESTORATION NETWORK — $60,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetOPEN SPACE INSTITUTE INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetX-CEL INC — $30,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetMAINE LAKES SOCIETY DBA MAINE LAKES — $20,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetTechbridge Girls — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHEART OF BIDDEFORD — $20,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetMaine Coast Heritage Trust — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBrunswick-Topsham Land Trust Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe San Diego River Park Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTree Trust — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERISTY FINANCING CORP — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPHIPPSBURG LAND TRUST — $10,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF SCARBOROUGH MARSH — $10,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetLEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBLUE SKY FUND — $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetFLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRANGELEY LAKES HERITAGE TRUST INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWildlife Heritage Foundation of New Hampshire — $10,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetATTLEBORO LAND TRUST INC — $10,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetMaine Farmland Trust — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY SUMMITS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetWolfe's Neck Farm Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLoon Echo Land Trust Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE DIGDEEP RIGHT TO WATER PROJECT — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHATTAHOOCHEE RIVERKEEPER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN RIVERS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Forests — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST FLORIDA STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGallatin River Task Force — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSomali Bantu Community Association of Maine — $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetGEORGIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY — $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetRARITAN HEADWATERS ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMILL CITY GROWS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCLEAN OCEAN ACCESS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSUN RIVER WATERSHED — $10,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetLOS ANGELES CLEANTECH INCUBATOR — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

PatagoniaorgMaine Community Found…Davis Conservation Fo…Onion FoundationElmina B Sewall Found…Clif Family FoundationJohn Sage FoundationQuimby Family Foundat…Morton-Kelly Charitab…ImpactassetsincThe Nature ConservancyThe Pfizer Foundation…
PatagoniaorgCA23.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Patagoniaorg · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Davis Conservation Foundation · Onion Foundation · Elmina B Sewall Foundation · Clif Family Foundation · John Sage Foundation · Quimby Family Foundation · Morton-Kelly Charitable Trust · Impactassetsinc · The Nature Conservancy · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Woodard & Curran Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Raritan Headwaters Association — 94% of income from government
  • Ridge to Reefs Inc — 33% of income from government
  • Mill City Grows Inc — 7% of income from government
  • X-Cel Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Northwest Florida State College Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines