Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Women Inspiring Philanthropy

WOMEN INSPIRING PHILANTHROPY is a community of women that seeks to transform lives in arlington, texas through high-impact and lifelong giving.

$225k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232025.

Health$175kFood & Nutrition$100kEducation$100kArts & Culture$50kReligion$50kHuman Services$50k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$326k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HELPING RESTORE ABILITY$75,000
DESTINY EMPOWERMENT ENTERPRISES$50,000
JORDAN E HARRIS FOUNDATION$50,000
HOPE TUTORING$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%DESTINY EMPOWERMENT ENTERPRISES: $50k → 11%ARLINGTON CHARITIES: $50k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Atx Helps

ATX Helps was created to fill gaps in the spectrum of services available to people in Austin who are experiencing homelessness.

Human Services
2
Achievement Center of Texas Inc

Provide day care, day habilitation (life skills training), arts exploration, educational assistance and community inclusion for children and young adults with special needs.

Human Services
3
A Glimmer of Hope Foundation Austin
Philanthropy
4
Adult Protective Services Partners Inc

Provide support and financial resources to clients of Adult Protective Services, an agency of the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services; to raise public awareness of the need for such services; and to advocate on behalf of…

5
Hearts for Homes

The mission of Hearts for Homes is to improve the living conditions of low-income senior homeowners in Denton County. Hearts for Homes is a nonprofit Christian outreach providing hope and dignity through home rehabilitation, affording…

Human Services
6
Starr of Hope

The mission of STARR of Hope, in collaboration with the community resources, is to provide prevention, intervention, and advocacy for women and children who experience domestic abuse or violence in Starr, Zapata and Jim Hogg Counties.

Housing & Shelter
7
Arlington Hearts and Hands Inc

To provide food and clothing to those in need in the Arlington,Texas area.

Human Services
8
Feeding America Texas

Feeding America Texas operates exclusively for charitable purposes by supporting food assistance, hunger relief, and community aid initiatives for individuals and families experiencing food insecurity throughout Texas. The organization…

Food & Nutrition
9
Texas Reach Out Inc

Provides housing and spiritual development for Christians reintegrating into society upon exiting the criminal justice system.

Health
10
The Giving Rose Foundation Atx
Public Benefit
11
Star Sponsorship Program Inc

Tuition for students of low-income families.

Education
12
Angelheart Inc

A Texas State Approved foster care and adoption placement for children under the age of 18 that are in family or self-crisis.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arlington Charities Inc and the most unlike its peers is Taste Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Helping Restore Ability — $75,000 · OtherHelping Restore AbilityARLINGTON DANCE THEATRE INC — $50,000 · OtherARLINGTON DANCE THEATRE INCFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $50,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHSHAREFEST TEXAS INC — $50,000 · EducationSHAREFEST TEXAS INCADVOCATES FOR SPECIAL PEOPLE INC — $50,000 · EducationADVOCATES FOR SPECIAL PEOPLE INCHOPE TUTORING CENTER INC — $50,000 · EducationHOPE TUTORING CENTER INCDestiny Empowerment Enterprises Inc — $50,000 · Human ServicesDestiny Empowerment E…ARLINGTON CHARITIES INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesARLINGTON CHARITIES I…TASTE PROJECT — $50,000 · Food & NutritionTASTE PROJ…Jordan Elizabeth Harris Foundation — $50,000 · HealthJordan Eli…
Other$175,000Education$150,000Human Services$100,000Food & Nutrition$50,000Health$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHelping Restore Ability — $75,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetARLINGTON DANCE THEATRE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 59% of budgetTASTE PROJECT — $50,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetSHAREFEST TEXAS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 58% of budgetDestiny Empowerment Enterprises Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 61% of budgetADVOCATES FOR SPECIAL PEOPLE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetARLINGTON CHARITIES INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX22.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Arlington Tomorrow Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Ann L Rhodes and Carol Greene Rhodes · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Women Inspiring Philanthropy funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Women Inspiring Philanthropy?

    Find your warmest path to Women Inspiring Philanthropy through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph