· Public charity
Women 4 Women Inc
Women 4 women and its donors improve the lives of women and girls in metro louisville through education, advocacy and fundraising for focused grantmaking in 4 key areas that enable self-sufficiency.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2021.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $84k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 5% of Women 4 Women Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in KY; read by stated purpose it is 93% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To help victims of intimate partner abuse or sexual violence become survivors through supportive services, community education and cooperative partnerships that foster hope, promote self-sufficiency and rebuild lives.
To reach and help women who struggle with alcohol and chemical dependency; to offer assistance and resources to women while going through the rehabilitation process; to provide a safe environment and shelter to homeless women; to provide…
Volunteers in action seeking safety and permanency for our community's youngest victims. casa provides support, advocacy, and intervention for abused, neglected, and dependent children in south central ky's family court system.
To provide transitional shelter for homeless women and their dependent children while these women are receiving the necessary training and skills to become self sufficient
A sanctuary for survivors of domestic violence, sexual assault, and substance use disorders.
To help sexually exploited and trafficked women find freedom through the love of jesus. we do this through our jail outreach program and through our emergency safehouse specifically designed to help women get safe, stable, and on to their…
To show god's love to those in need by providing an integrated path to holistic life change.
To provide safety, shelter and support to empower all impacted by domestic abuse, sexual violence, child abuse & trafficking.
To provide families in western kentucky with education, advocacy and treatment that prevents child abuse, encourages family stability, promotes healthy relationships, enhances well-being and cultivates safe, nurturing families.
The mission of chrysalis house inc. is to provide family-oriented treatment and recovery support for women with substance use disorders.
Care of unhoused pregnant women and their children.
The mission of the women's advocacy center is to empower and support survivors and victims of domestic abuse in east shelby county, tennessee. we do this using a 24-month, vertical abuse intervention model to educate women on how to gain…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Adult Development in Action Inc and the most unlike its peers is Prodigal Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds LIFEHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds REFUGE FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds SCARLET HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds PRODIGAL MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF KENTUCKIANA INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH LOUISVILLE COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN OF LOUISVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds LOUISVILLE CENTRAL COMMUNITY CENTERINC ↗
- Who funds SHIVELY AREA MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF KENTUCKIANA INC ↗
- Who funds LOUISVILLE MEDICAL LEGAL COMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds MARYHURST INC ↗
- Who funds DRESS FOR SUCCESS LOUISVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG ADULT DEVELOPMENT IN ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds MOMS CLOSET RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LEGAL AID SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds ANCHAL INC ↗
- Who funds CASA OF THE RIVER REGION ↗
- Who funds Spina Bifida Association of Kentucky Inc ↗
- Who funds BEADED TREASURES PROJECT ↗
- Who funds LA CASITA CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Uniting Partners for Women and Children ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · The Gheens Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Kosair Charities Committee Inc · Cralle Foundation Inc · Metro United Way Inc · LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc · Republic Bank Foundation Inc · Snowy Owl Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Women 4 Women Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.