Skip to content

· Public charity

Woman's Hospital Foundation D/B/A Woman's Hospital

To improve the health of women and infants.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$577k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$4.8MRecreation & Sports$565kCommunity Improvement$255kArts & Culture$68kEducation$25kYouth Development$10k
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 17 grants below total $999,478, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,026,255 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $26,777 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $135k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $250k
  • $250k+1 grant · $577k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.3B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOUNDATION FOR WOMAN'S$576,880
SOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$150,000
BATON ROUGE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$100,000
THE SAFETY PLACE$30,000
MARCH OF DIMES FOUNDATION (LOUISIANA CHAPTER)$25,000
KELLY CARES FOUNDATION$25,000
BATON ROUGE AREA FOUNDATION$15,000
LOUISIANA RESOURCE & DEVELOPMENT$10,417
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$10,000
BIG BUDDY BATON ROUGE$10,000
BAYOU TRADITIONS$10,000
MADDIE'S FOOTPRINTS LLC$7,500
LOUISIANA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION$7,500
TIGER ATHLETIC FOUNDATION$6,500
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%MADDIE'S FOOTPRINTS LLC: $10k → 17%MADDIE'S FOOTPRINTS LLC: $8k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.4M · 16 repeat orgs$338k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
7

Total granted

$6.4M
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+8%

Still filing today

100%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $273k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR WOMANS
    5× · 2021–2025 · $5.0M · revenue +5% · 51% of their budget
  • TA
    TIGER ATHLETIC FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $537k · revenue +43%
  • BR
    BATON ROUGE AREA CHAMBER
    6× · 2017–2024 · $210k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • FM
    Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady University
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +12%
  • JL
    JUNIOR LEAGUE OF BATON ROUGE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue -48%
  • 1B
    100 BLACK MEN OF METROPOLITAN BATON ROUGE LTD
    2× · 2023–2024 · $8k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lsu Research Foundation
Community Improvement
2
Louisiana Cancer Foundation for Research and Education Inc

To improve opportunities for cancer research in Louisiana and enhance educational efforts regarding prevention and control over cancer.

Health
3
Louisiana State Medical Society

The society's exempt purpose is to extend medical knowledge, advance medical science, elevate the standards of medical education and training, enforce just medical laws and regulations, promote dialogue and cooperation among physicians and…

—
4
Lsu Alumni Association

The mission is to protect, promote, and foster the welfare of louisiana state university and to create and nurture mutually beneficial relationships between the university and its alumni and friends. the association, using the talents and…

—
5
Lsu Health Sciences Foundation in Shreveport

The sole mission of the foundation is to support, enhance and assist the lsu health sciences center at shreveport in its many endeavors.

Philanthropy
6
Louisiana Foundation for Excellence in Science Technology and Education

To promote excellence in science, technology, and education by supporting education and research projects that enhance the economy of louisiana.

Philanthropy
7
Louisiana State Medical Society Educational and Research Foundation

The primary purpose of the foundation is to engage in and carry out scientific research in the fields of medical science, medical economics, public health, sociology, and related areas for the benefit of the interested public, medical…

Health
8
Lsu Foundation

The lsu foundation cultivates and invests in philanthropic partnerships to support and advance lsu's academic priorities.

Education
9
Lsu School of Medicine New Orleans Medical Alumni Association Inc

To act as a fundraising arm, in an agency relationship for the lsu health sciences center.

Education
10
Beauregard Health System Foundation Inc

To assist in improving healthcare in Beauregard Parish, Louisiana.

Health
11
Spirit of Charity Foundation

It is the mission of the spirit of charity foundation to support and facilitate patient-centered care, actively promote health and wellness and to advance medical research and education through fundraising efforts for the benefit of umcno,…

Philanthropy
12
Lsu Health Foundation New Orleans

The mission of the foundation is to inspire donors to invest in the lsu health sciences center - new orleans ("hsc-no") and its future, to properly steward those contributions, and to help meet the ever evolving needs of the lsuhsc-no by…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for Womans; the most unlike its peers is Louisiana Legislative Black Caucus Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/29
Grantees still filing
15/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FOUNDATION FOR WOMANS: $4,981,131 · HealthFOUNDATION FOR WOMANS+8 more: $408,121 · Health+8 moreTIGER ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $536,500 · EducationTIGER ATHLE…SOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $150,000 · EducationSOUTHEASTER…BATON ROUGE AREA CHAMBER: $210,000 · OtherLOUISIANA RESOURCE AND DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC: $32,917 · OtherFranciscan Missionaries of Our Lady University: $20,000 · OtherLOUISIANA NURSES FOUNDATION: $10,900 · Other+5 more: $34,000 · OtherBATON ROUGE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $100,000 · PhilanthropyKELLY CARES FOUNDATION: $60,000 · PhilanthropyBATON ROUGE AREA FOUNDATION: $15,000 · PhilanthropyKNOCK KNOCK CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $68,000 · EnvironmentTHE SAFETY PLACE: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentBIG BUDDY PROGRAM: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentJUNIOR LEAGUE OF BATON ROUGE INC: $15,000 · Community Improvement100 BLACK MEN OF METROPOLITAN BATON ROUGE LTD: $7,500 · Community ImprovementMADDIE'S FOOTPRINTS: $17,500 · Human Services
Health$5,389,252Education$686,500Other$307,817Philanthropy$175,000Environment$68,000Youth Development$60,000Community Improvement$22,500Human Services$17,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOUNDATION FOR WOMANS: $4,981,131 over 5y, 51% of budgetTIGER ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $536,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBATON ROUGE AREA CHAMBER: $210,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetBATON ROUGE HEALTH DISTRICT: $150,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $107,950 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBATON ROUGE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $87,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetKNOCK KNOCK CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $68,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetKELLY CARES FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 3y, 9.6% of budgetTHE SAFETY PLACE: $40,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetLOUISIANA RESOURCE AND DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC: $32,917 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetFranciscan Missionaries of Our Lady University: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BUDDY PROGRAM: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $17,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKARNIVAL KREWE DE LOUISIANE INC: $17,500 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetMADDIE'S FOOTPRINTS: $17,500 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetTexas Hospital Association Foundation: $16,490 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLOUISIANA NURSES FOUNDATION: $10,900 over 2y, 4.4% of budget100 BLACK MEN OF METROPOLITAN BATON ROUGE LTD: $7,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF BREAST SURGEONS: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBELLA BOWMAN FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetOur Lady of the Lake Foundation: $5,181 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANNAS GRACE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Our Lady of the Lake Hospital IncLA24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Our Lady of the Lake Hospital Inc · Albemarle Foundation · Ochsner Clinic Foundation · Baton Rouge Area Foundation · Capital Area United Way · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Credit Bureau of Baton Rouge Foundation · The Huey & Angelina Wilson Foundation · Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Louisiana Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Woman's Hospital Foundation D/B/A Woman's Hospital funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Woman's Hospital Foundation D/B/A Woman's Hospital. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Woman's Hospital Foundation D/B/A Woman's Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph