· Public charity
Capital Area United Way
To improve lives by leveraging partnerships in our community to advance the common good through education access, economic mobility, and healthy living.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 47 grants below total $2,554,523 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,708,363 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $153,840 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k23 grants · $612k
- $50k–250k24 grants · $1.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOPE MINISTRIES OF BATON ROUGE | $162,500 |
| YMCA GREATER BATON ROUGE | $150,000 |
| THE EMERGE CENTER | $150,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF BATON ROUGE | $112,500 |
| O'BRIEN HOUSE | $109,000 |
| GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SELA | $100,000 |
| VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA SOUTH CENTRAL LOUISIANA INC | $100,000 |
| FRONT YARD BIKES | $100,000 |
| HUMANITIES AMPED | $100,000 |
| SEXUAL TRAUMA AWARENESS AND RESPONSE CENTER | $77,500 |
| URBAN RESTORATION ENHANCEMENT CORPORATION | $75,000 |
| CAREER COMPASS | $74,000 |
| KIDS ORCHESTRA INC | $70,000 |
| CHILD ADVOCACY SERVICES | $60,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO LOUISIANA | $52,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $4.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
101 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2025, 57 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TETHE EMERGE CENTER INC8× · 2017–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +286% · 97% of their budget
- HMHOPE MINISTRIES OF BATON ROUGE9× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +77%
- TATHE ARC OF LOUISIANA5× · 2017–2021 · $1.3M · revenue +43% · 33% of their budget
Funded once
- BRBATON ROUGE SPEECH AND HEARING FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2018 · $300k · revenue +21%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $181k
- ONOPERATION NEHEMIAHone grant, 2018 · $141k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Arc of Greater New Orleans is committed to securing for all people with intellectual disabilities the opportunity to develop, function, and live to their fullest potential
To strengthen, promote, and build the capacity of louisiana's nonprofit sector through education, advocacy, and member services.
Provides quality training for early education providers
Together Louisiana is a network of faith and community institutions that works to strengthen local leadership and support practical solutions to everyday challenges. Its mission focuses on helping communities work together across race…
Rebuilding together new orleans helps low to moderate income greater new orleans area homeowners repair and rehabilitate their homes. rtno stabilizes and revitalizes neighborhoods and improves health and safety in our communities.
To provide high quality comprehensive health care services for the under-served population of east baton rouge parish and the surrounding areas regardless of ability to pay.
Promote and develop economic opportunity to those in need of increased ecomonic opportunity; to promote the education and welfare of the people of the community; and to form special interest groups as it deems necessary to solve special…
To improve health status through access to information, education, & health services.
To unite our community by funding programs in the areas of education, income and health. Our goal is to create long-lasting change that prevents problems from happening in the first place. Our community is the 5 parish area of Allen,…
To provide sound analysis of state fiscal issues to promote economic prosperity, a rising standard of living, and the opportunity for all citizens to reach their highest potential.
To provide children in Southwest Louisiana facing adversity with strong and enduring, professionally supported one-to-one relationships that change their lives for the better, forever.
Using direct representation and advocacy, we fight to keep children out of the justice system so that they can thrive in their homes and communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Particular Council of St Vincent De Paul of Baton Rouge Louisiana and the most unlike its peers is Crossroads Recovery House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
150 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 150 of the 190 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF BATON ROUGE INC ↗
- Who funds THE EMERGE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE MINISTRIES OF BATON ROUGE ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF LOUISIANA ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Louisiana Inc ↗
- Who funds BIG BUDDY PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds GREATER BATON ROUGE FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds YWCA OF GREATER BATON ROUGE ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICE OF GREATER BATON ROUGE ↗
- Who funds ST JAMES COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL AREA FAMILY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA INC ↗
- Who funds O'BRIEN HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BATON ROUGE INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL BATON ROUGE COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Louisiana Mental Health Association ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD ADVOCACY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds FRONT YARD BIKES ↗
- Who funds BATON ROUGE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA LEGAL SERVICES CORP ↗
- Who funds Baton Rouge Youth Coalition Inc ↗
- Who funds MID CITY REDEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds URBAN RESTORATION ENHANCEMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE LIFE OF A SINGLE MOM ↗
- Who funds OPENING DOORS A LOUISIANA NON-PROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds HUMANITIES AMPED ↗
- Who funds BATON ROUGE SPEECH AND HEARING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds REGINA COELI CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds Louisiana Resource Center for Educators ↗
- Who funds ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE WALLS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Baton Rouge Area Foundation · The Huey & Angelina Wilson Foundation · Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Louisiana Foundation · The Credit Bureau of Baton Rouge Foundation · Albemarle Foundation · The Merice Boo Johnston Grigsby Foundation · Irene W & Cb Pennington Private Foundation · The Charles Lamar Family Foundation · Rotary Club of Baton Rouge Foundation · The Greater New Orleans Foundation · Pennington Family Foundation · Our Lady of the Lake Hospital Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Capital Area United Way funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.