· Public charity
Woman's Hospital Foundation D/B/A Woman's Hospital
To improve the health of women and infants.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $1,249,764 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,321,499 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $71,735 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $63k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
- $250k+2 grants · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FOUNDATION FOR WOMAN'S | $869,264 |
| TIGER ATHLETIC FOUNDATION | $255,000 |
| BATON ROUGE AREA CHAMBER | $50,000 |
| KELLY CARES FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| JUNIOR LEAGUE OF BATON ROUGE | $15,000 |
| MARCH OF DIMES FOUNDATION (LOUISIANA CHAPTER) | $12,500 |
| THE SAFETY PLACE | $10,000 |
| LOUISIANA RESOURCE & DEVELOPMENT | $7,500 |
| KARNIVAL KREWE DE LOUISIANA | $5,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FFFOUNDATION FOR WOMANS4× · 2021–2024 · $4.4M · revenue +227% · 51% of their budget
- TATIGER ATHLETIC FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2024 · $530k · revenue +43%
- BRBATON ROUGE AREA CHAMBER6× · 2017–2024 · $210k · revenue +34%
Funded once
- FMFranciscan Missionaries of Our Lady Universityone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +12%
- MFMADDIE'S FOOTPRINTSgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +51%
- BBBIG BUDDY PROGRAMone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The society's exempt purpose is to extend medical knowledge, advance medical science, elevate the standards of medical education and training, enforce just medical laws and regulations, promote dialogue and cooperation among physicians and…
To improve opportunities for cancer research in Louisiana and enhance educational efforts regarding prevention and control over cancer.
To conduct patient-safety activities in order to support pso members in improving patient safety and the quality of healthcare delivery.
The mission is to protect, promote, and foster the welfare of louisiana state university and to create and nurture mutually beneficial relationships between the university and its alumni and friends. the association, using the talents and…
To assist in improving healthcare in Beauregard Parish, Louisiana.
The sole mission of the foundation is to support, enhance and assist the lsu health sciences center at shreveport in its many endeavors.
The primary purpose of the foundation is to engage in and carry out scientific research in the fields of medical science, medical economics, public health, sociology, and related areas for the benefit of the interested public, medical…
To strengthen, promote, and build the capacity of louisiana's nonprofit sector through education, advocacy, and member services.
To fight cancer through research, education, and service to patience and their families.
To develop a coordinated cancer research and educational program that will optimize discovery and development of innovative cancer therapies; lead to innovative clinial treatment programs offering new opportunities for early detection,…
The mission of the louisiana state bar association is to assist its members in the practice of law, assure access to and aid in the administration of justice, assist the supreme court in the regulation of the practice of law, uphold the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for Womans and the most unlike its peers is Bella Bowman Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR WOMANS ↗
- Who funds TIGER ATHLETIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BATON ROUGE AREA CHAMBER ↗
- Who funds BATON ROUGE HEALTH DISTRICT ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds KNOCK KNOCK CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds KELLY CARES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA RESOURCE AND DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady University ↗
- Who funds KARNIVAL KREWE DE LOUISIANE INC ↗
- Who funds Texas Hospital Association Foundation ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF BATON ROUGE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds MADDIE'S FOOTPRINTS ↗
- Who funds BIG BUDDY PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds THE SAFETY PLACE ↗
- Who funds 100 BLACK MEN OF METROPOLITAN BATON ROUGE LTD ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF BREAST SURGEONS ↗
- Who funds BELLA BOWMAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA NURSES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ANNAS GRACE FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Our Lady of the Lake Hospital Inc · Albemarle Foundation · Ochsner Clinic Foundation · Baton Rouge Area Foundation · Capital Area United Way · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Credit Bureau of Baton Rouge Foundation · The Huey & Angelina Wilson Foundation · Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Louisiana Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Woman's Hospital Foundation D/B/A Woman's Hospital funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.