Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wolfen Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$600k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$2.6MEducation$1.3MCivil Rights$857kCommunity Improvement$496kCrime & Legal$416kReligion$406kFood & Nutrition$326kPhilanthropy$157kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $265k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $306k
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.6M
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$43M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UCLA FOUNDATION$600,000
JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION$500,000
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK$250,000
UCSF FOUNDATION$250,000
WILSHIRE BLVD TEMPLE$156,000
BIG SUNDAY$100,000
UCLA HILLEL$50,000
GO CAMPAIGN$40,000
VENICE FAMILY CLINIC$25,000
LA GOAL$25,000
GEFFEN PLAYHOUSE$25,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LA$25,000
COLUMBIABARNARD HILLEL$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
PENN HILLEL$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $62k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%VISTA DEL MAR: $500 → 14%THE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%GO CAMPAIGN: $40k → 14%ONE VOICE: $10k → 14%GO CAMPAIGN: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OR
IA
PA
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
KS
NC
DC
OK
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.6M · 43 repeat orgs$559k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 29 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
45

Total granted

$5.6M
$434k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+28%

Still filing today

65%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $125k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalArts & CultureEducationHealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TJ
    THE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +50%
  • BS
    Big Sunday
    7× · 2017–2024 · $496k · revenue +69%
  • BT
    BET TZEDEK
    4× · 2017–2024 · $415k · revenue +123%

Funded once

  • BL
    BERKELEY LAW OPPORTUNITY SCHOLARSHIP
    one grant, 2019 · $250k
  • CI
    CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -2%
  • TB
    TEMPLE BETH EL
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
5
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
6
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
7
Los Angeles World Affairs Council and Town Hall

The organization is a non-partisan, membership based speakers' forum that connects business leaders, community members, and engaged individuals with shared interest in local, national, and global affairs. it provides an open and accessible…

International
8
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
9
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
10
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
11
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
12
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint John's Health Center Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 101 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
54/55
Grantees still filing
40/55
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $1,300,000 · OtherTHE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATIONBET TZEDEK: $415,000 · OtherBET TZEDEKUC REGENTS: $400,000 · OtherUC REGENTSINTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW CLINIC: $350,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW CLINICLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $270,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANKBERKELEY LAW OPPORTUNITY SCHOLARSHIP: $250,000 · OtherBERKELEY LAW OPPORTUNITY SCHOLARSHIPWILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLE: $178,500 · Other+74 more: $625,313 · Other+74 moreUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $1,150,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FR…UCLA FOUNDATION: $695,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $100,000 · Education+4 more: $5,850 · EducationBig Sunday: $496,000 · Community ImprovementBig Sunda…LOS ANGELES JEWISH HOME FOR THE AGING: $75,000 · Community ImprovementLOS ANGEL…SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $375,000 · Crime & LegalJEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA: $151,850 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $5,000 · Civil Rights+2 more: $1,200 · Civil RightsGo Campaign: $50,000 · Human ServicesOne Voice: $10,000 · Human Services+3 more: $1,700 · Human Services
Other$3,788,813Education$1,950,850Community Improvement$571,000Crime & Legal$375,000Philanthropy$151,850Civil Rights$131,200Human Services$61,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $1,300,000 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $1,150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $695,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBig Sunday: $496,000 over 7y, 16% of budgetBET TZEDEK: $415,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $375,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $270,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA: $151,850 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLA GOAL: $100,500 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL AT UCLA: $85,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetLOS ANGELES JEWISH HOME FOR THE AGING: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGo Campaign: $50,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetGEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBIABARNARD HILLEL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $19,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $11,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOne Voice: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES MUSIC AND ART SCHOOL: $7,250 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH CONGRESS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetTHE NEWS LITERACY PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $2,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $1,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $850 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $638 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOS ANGELES CHAMBER ORCHESTRA SOCIETY INC: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Big Sunday ↗
  • Who funds BET TZEDEK ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LA GOAL ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL AT UCLA ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES JEWISH HOME FOR THE AGING ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds Go Campaign ↗
  • Who funds GEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIABARNARD HILLEL INC ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds One Voice ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES MUSIC AND ART SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH CONGRESS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NEWS LITERACY PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA26.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Harry and Barbara Goldman Foundation Co Lynne G Silbert President · Shapiro Family Charitable Foundation · S Mark Taper Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jewish Communal Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wolfen Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wolfen Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Wolfen Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Wolfen Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 101 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wolfen Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph