Skip to content
WITAN Corp at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

WITAN Corp

WITAN Corp is an organization of women organized to encourage and promote volunteer service in the community, to educate its members in civic responsibility and to raise funds for special civic needs.

$184k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Human Services$157kFood & Nutrition$51kHealth$45kYouth Development$26kCrime & Legal$8kEducation$6kReligion$6kHousing & Shelter$1k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $25,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $184,134 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $159,134 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$524k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPEN M$10,000
Good Samaritan Hunger Center$7,500
Peter Maurin Center$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $225k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Family & Community Services: $6k → 12%CORE Furniture Bank: $75k → 13%CORE Furniture Bank: $10k → 13%CORE Furniture Bank: $7k → 13%Victims Assistance Program: $8k → 13%Keys to Serenity: $7k → 13%Open M: $10k → 13%Open M: $10k → 13%OPEN M: $10k → 13%Peter Maurin Center: $10k → 13%South Street Ministries Inc: $6k → 13%Peter Maurin Center: $8k → 13%Open M: $5k → 13%Family Promise: $8k → 13%Crossings Akron: $6k → 13%Blessings in a Backpack: $8k → 13%Blessings in a Backpack: $8k → 13%Blessings in a Backpack: $7k → 13%Battered Womens Shelter: $10k → 13%Battered Womens Shelter: $8k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$232k · 8 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
12

Total granted

$232k
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
0%

Still filing today

88%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentEducationHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $23k · revenue +19%
  • GS
    GOOD SAMARITAN HUNGER CENTER
    3× · 2022–2025 · $22k · revenue +27%
  • PM
    Peter Maurin Center of Akron
    2× · 2024–2025 · $18k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue 0%
  • VA
    VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM INC
    one grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue 0%
  • VH
    Vincent House
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Good Samaritan Mission Inc

To care for the needy, share the good news of jesus christ and change lives by providing counseling, life skill training, dignity gained through work and christ-centered discipleship.

—
2
Akronbarbertonsummit County Continuum of Care

Promote communitywide committment to the goal of ending homelessness.

Philanthropy
3
Harmony House Inc

Harmony house is an emergency supportive housing program for young people ages 18-24. harmony house provides emergency housing, transitional housing, rapid rehousing and inclement weather shelter. harmony house is the only program of its…

Housing & Shelter
4
Survivors Resources Inc Dba Safe Haven Inc of Pike County

Provide counseling, crisis intervention, 24 hour crisis hotline, advocacy, safe housing and supportive services to victims of sexual assault and domestic violence.

—
5
Survivor Advocacy Outreach Program

To educate, empower, enact dedicated to the healing and prevention of sexual violence in southeast ohio.

Health
6
Bridging Our Communities Together for Success

Bridging our communities together for success is a women-led organization 501c3 non-profit organization with a mission to bring more workforce opportunities to central ohio by having programs that will help to better prepare individuals.

Human Services
7
Fresh Start Outreach Ministry Inc

It is the mission of Fresh Start Ministry to be the hands and feet of God by serving others in need in Monroe County. we have a mens and womans shelter and a program to help people get back on there feet

Human Services
8
Homeless Outreach Team of Stark Cou

Assist the homeless to rise out of poverty

Housing & Shelter
9
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
10
The Open Shelter Inc

The open shelter provides, directly or by referral emergency shelter and assistance for homeless and marginally housed persons in central ohio, especially the most vulnerable among them; and to provide directly or by referral, coordinated,…

Housing & Shelter
11
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
12
Its Going to Be Ok Inc

Our mission is to work toward the eradication of human trafficking, particularly the sexual exploitation of women and children. It's Going To Be OK rescues and restores survivors by providing trauma-informed direct care services, including…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of Summit County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Good Samaritan Hunger Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
7/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY OUTREACH RESOURCES EXCHAN: $92,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY OUTREACH RESOURCES EXCHANOPPORTUNITY PARISH ECUMENICAL NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRY: $35,000 · Human ServicesOPPORTUNITY PARISH ECUMENICAL NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRYBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $22,500 · Human ServicesBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INCPeter Maurin Center of Akron: $17,500 · Human ServicesPeter Maurin Center of AkronHOPE AND HEALING SURVIVOR RESOURCE CENTER: $17,500 · Human ServicesHOPE AND HEALING SURVIVOR RESOURCE CENTERFAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY INC: $7,725 · Human Services+5 more: $32,836 · Human Services+5 moreGOOD SAMARITAN HUNGER CENTER: $22,000 · Food & NutritionPROJECT ED BEAR INC: $11,000 · OtherVincent House: $7,500 · Other+1 more: $600 · OtherRAPE CRISIS CENTER: $14,000 · HealthLIMITLESS AMBITION INC: $7,000 · EducationBroken Chains Jail & Prison Ministry Inc: $6,000 · ReligionGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH EAST OHIO: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentProject Beginnings I Inc: $600 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$225,061Food & Nutrition$22,000Other$19,100Health$14,000Education$7,000Religion$6,000Youth Development$5,000Housing & Shelter$600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY OUTREACH RESOURCES EXCHAN: $92,000 over 3y, 96% of budgetOPPORTUNITY PARISH ECUMENICAL NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRY: $35,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $22,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN HUNGER CENTER: $22,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetPeter Maurin Center of Akron: $17,500 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetHOPE AND HEALING SURVIVOR RESOURCE CENTER: $17,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRAPE CRISIS CENTER: $14,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY INC: $7,725 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetVICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLIMITLESS AMBITION INC: $7,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetCrossings Akron: $6,336 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetSOUTH STREET MNISTRIES INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBroken Chains Jail & Prison Ministry Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH EAST OHIO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetProject Beginnings I Inc: $600 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTarry House Inc: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Akron Community Found…Sisler McFawn Foundat…Glenn R & Alice V Bog…W Paul Mills & Thora …Lloyd L & Louise K Sm…L R Moffitt & L W Mof…Charles E and Mabel M…The Welty Family Foun…Mary S & David C Corb…Northern Ohio Golf Ch…United Way of Summit …The Mary and Dr Georg…
Akron Community FoundationOH33.9× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Akron Community Foundation · Sisler McFawn Foundation Pfdn · Glenn R & Alice V Boggess Memorial · W Paul Mills & Thora J Mills Memorial · Lloyd L & Louise K Smith Foundation · L R Moffitt & L W Moffitt Foundation · Charles E and Mabel M Ritchie Memorial · The Welty Family Foundation · Mary S & David C Corbin Foundation · Northern Ohio Golf Charities Foundation Inc · United Way of Summit and Medina · The Mary and Dr George L Demetros Charitable

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization WITAN Corp funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from WITAN Corp. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on WITAN’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home