· Private foundation
Wiseheart Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k37 grants · $109k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $202k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PLYMOUTH CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH | $25,000 |
| FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $22,500 |
| CARE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC | $20,000 |
| ENGLEWOOD HEALTH FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| GOOD HOPE EQUESTRIAN TRAINING CTR | $20,000 |
| KEY LIFE NETWORK INC | $20,000 |
| CORNELL UNIVERSITY | $20,000 |
| GRANADA PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $20,000 |
| MIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND | $12,000 |
| FLAT ROCK BROOK NATURE CENTER | $11,000 |
| CASA FAMILIA | $11,000 |
| BERGEN FAMILY CENTER | $9,000 |
| THE ELIZABETH MORROW SCHOOL | $7,500 |
| BERGEN VOLUNTEER CENTER | $6,000 |
| COCONUT GROVE CRISIS FOOD PANTRY IN | $5,800 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $147k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
52 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CECARE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC6× · 2020–2025 · $85k · revenue +25%
- EMELISABETH MORROW SCHOOL INC6× · 2020–2025 · $73k · revenue +9%
- CFCASA FAMILIA INC6× · 2020–2025 · $65k · revenue +457%
Funded once
- CMCHRISTCHURCH MIAMIone grant, 2025 · $5k
- ANAGAPE NETWORK INCone grant, 2025 · $5k · revenue 0%
- ASANN STORCK CENTER INCone grant, 2025 · $3k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Miami jewish health systems, inc. was incorporated to provide shelter for the elderly and develop social & health programs relating to their care. in addition, research & educational programs are conducted for the elderly to enhance their…
Saint andrew's school is an independent school founded in the episcopal tradition. our mission is to build a community of learners, provide excellence in education, and nurture each student in mind, body, and spirit.
Miami country day school's mission is to educate children from junior kindergarten through 12th grade.
The mission of communities in schools is to surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.
Brooklyn heights montessori school provides educational services to preschool, elementary and middle school students in grades 1 to 8 in line with the montessori philosophy.
Leading the creation and advancement of health equity we exist to improve the health and well-being of individuals and communities, increase the diversity of the health professional and scientific workforce, and address primary health care…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Child care services to economically disadvantaged children.
Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.
To provide health care and services to those in need; to minimize human suffering; to assist people to wholeness and to nurture an awareness of their relationship with god.
The institute for child and family health is committed to empowering the children, youth and families of miami-dade county, florida by providing services that enhance their emotional, physical and educational well-being.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dwight-Englewood School and the most unlike its peers is Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 52 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KEY LIFE NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds GOOD HOPE EQUESTRIAN & REGENERATIVE FARM INC ↗
- Who funds CARE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds ELISABETH MORROW SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds CASA FAMILIA INC ↗
- Who funds BERGEN FAMILY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Cornell University ↗
- Who funds MIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED INC ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEER CENTER OF BERGEN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds MIDDLESEX SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THELMA GIBSON HEALTH INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds DWIGHT-ENGLEWOOD SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Miami Rescue Mission Inc ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY CHEST OF ENGLEWOOD ↗
- Who funds CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds COCONUT GROVE CARES INC ↗
- Who funds ST ALBAN'S DAY NURSERY INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds GLORY HOUSE OF MIAMI INC ↗
- Who funds THE SUNDARI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DANA HALL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA ↗
- Who funds BUDDY SYSTEM MIA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Miami Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · United Way Miami Inc · Naida S Wharton Foundation · Coral Gables Community Foundation Inc · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · The Mann Family Foundation Inc · Peacock Foundation Inc · Dunspaugh Dalton Foundation Inc · Td Charitable Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wiseheart Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Casa Familia Inc — 53% of income from government
- Bergen Family Center — 25% of income from government
- Agape Network Inc — 22% of income from government
- Care Elementary School Inc — 8% of income from government
- The Children's Home Society of Florida — 6% of income from government
- The Sundari Foundation Inc — 5% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- Volunteer Center of Bergen County Inc — 4% of income from government
- Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc — 4% of income from government
- Legal Services of Greater Miami Inc — 2% of income from government
- Ann Storck Center Inc — 0% of income from government
- Miami Lighthouse for the Blind and Visually Impaired Inc — 0% of income from government
- Chapman Partnership Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.