Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Winnebago County Bar Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Crime & Legal$48kHuman Services$30kEmployment$14kEducation$12kHealth$9kYouth Development$4kReligion$3kCivil Rights$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$163k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REMEDIES RENEWING LIVES$3,400
FARMWORKER & LANDSCAPER ADVOCACY$2,500
NIU COLLEGE OF LAW$2,000
FAMILY PEACE CENTER$1,600
17TH CIRCUIT THERAPY DOG VOLUNTEERS$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YOUTH SERVICES NETWORK: $4k → 15%WINNEBAGO COUNTY CASA: $6k → 15%WINNEBAGO COUNTY CASA: $6k → 15%WINNEBAGO COUNTY CASA: $4k → 15%WINNEBAGO COUNTY CASA: $3k → 15%FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $2k → 15%WINNEBAGO COUNTY CASA: $2k → 15%FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $2k → 15%YMCA OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$87k · 9 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +175% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
12

Total granted

$87k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+175%
+31%

Still filing today

67%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalEmploymentHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WINNEBAGO COUNTY CASA
    5× · 2017–2022 · $21k · revenue +303%
  • FA
    FARMWORKER AND LANDSCAPER ADVOCACY PROJECT
    6× · 2019–2025 · $14k · revenue +913%
  • PS
    PRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC
    2× · 2019–2022 · $9k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE ARC OF WINNEBAGO BOONE & OGLEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $9k · revenue +31%
  • NI
    NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • YS
    YOUTH SERVICES NETWORK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $4k · revenue +125%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Casa of West Central Illinois

To advocate for abused and neglected children in the legal welfare system.

Crime & Legal
2
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Cook County

CASA of Cook County's vision is to protect abused and neglected children by providing them in court, a safe and permanent home, and an opportunity to grow, learn and thrive.

Crime & Legal
3
Family Counseling Services of No Il

To foster stronger communities by providing individuals with accessible, professional counseling and mental health care that empowers them to thrive

Human Services
4
North Suburban Legal Aid Clinic

North suburban legal aid clinic's mission is to provide accessible, quality, equitable, free legal services in the areas of domestic violence, housing, and immigration to give low-income, at-risk community members access to justice and the…

Crime & Legal
5
Casa of the Illinois Valley

Provide legal services for children in area.

Human Services
6
Legal Services of Northern Michigan

To be a public law firm that knows, as well as understands, the problems of even the poorest in our communities and addresses these problems through education, and with creative legal advocacy of the highest distinction. LSNM will be seen…

Crime & Legal
7
Casa of South Central Illinois

The trained volunteers of CASA of South Central Illinois will work with legal and child welfare professionals, educators, and service providers to advocate for the best interests of children that have experienced abuse and/or neglect that…

8
Center for Family Services

Administering an array of critical, intensive therapeutic interventions and/or facilitation services to emotionally and behaviorally disturbed clients for whom DCFS is legally responsible in order to stabilize their traditional or home of…

Human Services
9
Family Safety Network of Cass County Inc

To provide domestic abuse advocacy to parents and children of cass, hubbard and clearwater counties.

Human Services
10
Lakeshore Legal Aid

Standing with our neighbors, Lakeshore Legal Aid fights poverty and injustice through advocacy and by providing meaningful and dignified access to the legal system.

Crime & Legal
11
Legal Aid Service of Northeastern Minnesota

Our mission is to provide civil legal service to low-income clients. our legal services provide basic protection for our clients by enforcing the law when their rights have been violated, promote the self-sufficiency of individuals…

Crime & Legal
12
Rockford Sexual Assault Counseling Inc

Rockford sexual assault counseling, inc. (rsac) responds to the needs of victims of sexual assault/abuse and their families/significant others through emergency services, emotional support, counseling, referral, advocacy, and education,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Winnebago County Casa and the most unlike its peers is Farmworker and Landscaper Advocacy Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NIU COLLEGE OF LAW — $17,000 · OtherNIU COLLEGE OF LAWZEKE GIORGI LEGAL CLINIC — $11,000 · OtherZEKE GIORGI LEGAL CLINICTHE ARC OF WINNEBAGO BOONE & OGLE — $8,500 · OtherTHE ARC OF WINNEBAGO BOONE & OGLEBOYLAN HIGH SCHOOL — $6,500 · OtherBOYLAN HIGH SCHOOLNORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · OtherNORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITYWINNEBAGO COUNTY KIDS PLACE — $2,500 · Other+9 more — $9,963 · Other+9 moreWINNEBAGO COUNTY CASA — $20,750 · Human ServicesWINNEBAGO COUNTY CASAYOUTH SERVICES NETWORK INC — $4,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH SERVICES NETWORK INCFAMILY PEACE CENTER — $3,600 · Human ServicesFAMILY PEACE CENTERYMCA OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY — $1,000 · Human ServicesPRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC — $8,550 · Crime & LegalPRAIRIE STATE…CHILDREN'S SAFE HARBOR INC — $5,550 · Crime & LegalCHILDREN'S SA…FARMWORKER AND LANDSCAPER ADVOCACY PROJECT — $13,500 · EmploymentFARMWORKER A…REMEDIES RENEWING LIVES — $3,400 · Health
Other$60,463Human Services$29,350Crime & Legal$14,100Employment$13,500Health$3,400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWINNEBAGO COUNTY CASA — $20,750 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetFARMWORKER AND LANDSCAPER ADVOCACY PROJECT — $13,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetPRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC — $8,550 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ARC OF WINNEBAGO BOONE & OGLE — $8,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S SAFE HARBOR INC — $5,550 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES NETWORK INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY PEACE CENTER — $3,600 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetREMEDIES RENEWING LIVES — $3,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINNEBAGO COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION — $263 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WINNEBAGO COUNTY CASA
  • Who funds FARMWORKER AND LANDSCAPER ADVOCACY PROJECT
  • Who funds PRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC
  • Who funds THE ARC OF WINNEBAGO BOONE & OGLE
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S SAFE HARBOR INC
  • Who funds YOUTH SERVICES NETWORK INC
  • Who funds FAMILY PEACE CENTER
  • Who funds REMEDIES RENEWING LIVES
  • Who funds YMCA OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY
  • Who funds WINNEBAGO COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Northern ILIL24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northern IL · United Way of Rock River Valley · The Mill Foundation · Bergstrom Inc Charitable Foundation Xxxxx2008 · The Kjellstrom Family Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Winnebago County Bar Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph