· Private foundation
WIMCO Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k16 grants · $27k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $144k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ACES FOR AUTISM | $49,555 |
| KRISTI OVERTON JOHNSON MINISTRIES | $25,000 |
| DAUGHTERS OF WORTH | $24,555 |
| KELLY CHILDRENS HOME | $24,555 |
| EAGLE'S WINGS FOOD PANTRY | $10,500 |
| OPEN DOOR COMMUNITY CENTER | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $9,282 |
| Washington High School | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,375 |
| DAUGHTERS FOR DADS | $1,375 |
| FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH | $1,100 |
| BARTON COLLEGE | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $115k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AFACES FOR AUTISM4× · 2021–2024 · $247k · revenue +114%
- CWCombat Warriors Inc3× · 2021–2023 · $80k · revenue +31%
- EWEAGLES WINGS CHRISTIAN LOVE IN ACTION2× · 2023–2024 · $13k · revenue +5%
Funded once
- EIELDERHEART INCone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -33%
- POPURPOSE OF GOD ANNEX OUTREACH CENTERone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +24%
- CICJBB INCone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -46%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Faith Hope and Love Christian Ministries exist to glorify God by proclaiming the Gospel of Jesus Christ, nurturing spiritual growth, strengthening families, and serving our community with faith, hope, and love.
Provide assistance and shelter to abused and homeless women.
Providing shelter for the homeless
Jesus commanded, "love your neighbor as yourself." (mark 12:31) our ministry provides loving service to the poor and hungry. the organization will operate an ecumenical food pantry to serve those who need food assistance in york county and…
Our mission is to establish sustainable christian discipleship communities that foster healing in women and children that have experienced various forms of abuse through education, counseling, and biblical discipleship.
To provide various ministries including a homeless shelter, an addictions recovery program, and a widows and orphans program in a christian environment.
Evangelistic preaching the good news of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Missionary and support of missionaries at home and abroad. Praying and counseling with Gods people both at home and in the field. Benevolence to needy.
The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…
The mission of this organization to support children and young people facing various challenges with our community . our goal is to help people by proving essentials ressources, learning, and food.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kristi Overton Johnson Ministries and the most unlike its peers is Cjbb Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ACES FOR AUTISM ↗
- Who funds Kelly Childrens Home Inc ↗
- Who funds Combat Warriors Inc ↗
- Who funds KRISTI OVERTON JOHNSON MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds DAUGHTERS OF WORTH ↗
- Who funds EAGLES WINGS CHRISTIAN LOVE IN ACTION ↗
- Who funds Open Door Community Center ↗
- Who funds ELDERHEART INC ↗
- Who funds PURPOSE OF GOD ANNEX OUTREACH CENTER ↗
- Who funds CJBB INC ↗
- Who funds Jesus Others & You Inc ↗
- Who funds BARTON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: North Carolina Community Foundation · Blackwelder Family Foundation · Robertson Family Foundation Inc · Eddie and Jo Allison Smith Family Foundation Inc · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization WIMCO Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to WIMCO Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to WIMCO Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.