Skip to content

· Private foundation

Willis Hilda M Foundation No 2

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$660k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$2.1MEducation$850kFood & Nutrition$300kHealth$200kHousing & Shelter$63kHuman Services$56kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $550k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PITTSBURGH OPERA$150,000
CARNEGIE LIBRARY OF HOMESTEAD$150,000
PITTSBURGH YOUTH SYMPHONY$100,000
PITTSBURGH PUBLIC THEATRE$50,000
THE PITTSBURGH CULTURAL TRUST$50,000
PITTSBURGH BALLET THEATRE$50,000
EXTRA MILE EDUCATION FOUNDATION$30,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$25,000
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH$25,000
CITY THEATRE$25,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOMENS CENTER AND SHELTER: $11k → 11%WOMENS CENTER AND SHELTER: $10k → 11%WOMENS CENTER AND SHELTER: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 13 repeat orgs$235k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
3

Total granted

$3.4M
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+42%

Still filing today

85%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $175k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthFood & NutritionHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PO
    PITTSBURGH OPERA INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +21%
  • WT
    WINCHESTER THURSTON SCHOOL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $500k · revenue +17%
  • GP
    GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
    2× · 2021–2023 · $300k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -18%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOME OF PITTSBURGHgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +42%
  • RK
    RAINBOW KITCHEN
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
2
Pittsburgh International Classic Theatre

Challenging, educating and entertaining pittsburgh audiences by providing high quality theatre at reasonable prices, while focusing on irish, english and classical works.

Arts & Culture
3
Pittsburgh Arts & Lectures Inc

The mission of pittsburgh arts & lectures is to connect celebrated authors with the community, elevate civic discourse, and inspire creativity and a passion for the literary arts. our commitment to knowledge, learning, integrity, and…

Arts & Culture
4
Pittsburgh Festival Opera

Pittsburgh festival opera presents innovative opera for imaginative audiences. pittsburgh festival opera is pittsburgh's modern music drama company and, as such, focuses on creating new works, on reinterpreting older works in new ways, on…

Arts & Culture
5
New Hazlett Center for the Performing Arts

To provide a nurturing, collaborative environment for artists, leveraging people, space and technology to create and present challenging and dynamic art.

Arts & Culture
6
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
7
Pittsburgh Community Broadcasting Corporation

To create and distribute trusted content, build connections and strengthen our community through public media.

Arts & Culture
8
Whitaker Center for Science and the Arts

To create a space in our communities through education and cultural experiences that celebrate the joy of discovery and entertainment.

Arts & Culture
9
Carnegie Institute

To preserve and expand the resources of art and science as agents of personal growth and social advancement in pittsburgh and beyond.

Arts & Culture
10
Quantum Theatre Inc

Quantum theatre is a company of progressive, professional artists dedicated to producing intimate and sophisticated theatrical experiences in uncommon settings, exploring universal themes of truth, beauty, and human relationships in…

Arts & Culture
11
Children's Museum of Pittsburgh

The museum's mission is to provide innovative and inclusive museum experiences that inspire kindness, joy, creativity and curiosity for all learners.

Arts & Culture
12
The Friends of the Pittsburgh Institutions
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pittsburgh Cultural Trust; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PITTSBURGH OPERA INC: $1,595,000 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURGH OPERA INCPITTSBURGH BALLET THEATRE INC: $200,000 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURGH BALLET THEATRE INCPITTSBURGH PUBLIC THEATER CORPORATION: $95,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $110,000 · Arts & Culture+3 moreWINCHESTER THURSTON SCHOOL: $500,000 · OtherWINCHESTER THURSTON SCHOOLCarnegie Library of Homestead: $300,000 · OtherCarnegie Library of HomesteadCHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH: $150,000 · OtherCHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGHPITTSBURGH YOUTH SYMPHONY: $100,000 · OtherPITTSBURGH YOUTH SYMPHONY+3 more: $52,500 · OtherGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $300,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER P…FAMILY HOUSE INC: $62,750 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $50,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOME OF PITTSBURGH: $25,000 · HealthEXTRA MILE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationWOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $31,000 · Human Services
Arts & Culture$2,000,000Other$1,102,500Food & Nutrition$300,000Health$137,750Education$50,000Human Services$31,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPITTSBURGH OPERA INC: $1,595,000 over 5y, 7.2% of budgetWINCHESTER THURSTON SCHOOL: $500,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $300,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCarnegie Library of Homestead: $300,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetPITTSBURGH BALLET THEATRE INC: $200,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetPITTSBURGH PUBLIC THEATER CORPORATION: $95,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY HOUSE INC: $62,750 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEXTRA MILE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetThe City Theatre Company Inc: $35,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetWOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $31,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $25,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME OF PITTSBURGH: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Allegheny FoundationPA19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Allegheny Foundation · The Jack Buncher Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · Federated Investors Foundation Inc · Howard & Nell E Miller Foundat · The Burke Family Foundation · The Burke Foundation · McCune Foundation Pnc Bank Na · Eden Hall Foundation · The Grable Foundation · Wi Patterson Charitable Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Willis Hilda M Foundation No 2 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Willis Hilda M Foundation No 2. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Willis Hilda M Foundation No 2?

    Find your warmest path to Willis Hilda M Foundation No 2 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Willis Hilda M Foundation No 2’s filings →

    More from the funding graph