Skip to content

· Private foundation

William Stanley Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$33k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$87kArts & Culture$9kCommunity Improvement$8kYouth Development$6kHealth$6kScience & Tech$4kInternational$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$631k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$2,012
UCCS FARM$2,000
I-THIRST INTERNATIONAL$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
NAT SPACE SCIENCE TECH$2,000
SPACE ACADEMY$2,000
CIVICO$2,000
EDUCATING CHILDREN OF C$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
PEAK EDUCATION$2,000
NAT HISPANIC HONOR SOC$2,000
STAGING HER$1,814
Individual grant recipient$1,750
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE PLACE: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$46k · 10 repeat orgs$116k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
59

Total granted

$46k
$88k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+15%

Still filing today

40%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PE
    Peak Education
    6× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +283%
  • MM
    MINDS MATTER COLORADO INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $9k · revenue +28%
  • CS
    COLORADO SPRINGS PIONEERS MUSEUM
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • AP
    Atlas Preparatory School Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +94%
  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • KO
    KIDS ON BIKES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ascend College Prep

Ascend College Prep is a public high school for 10-12th grade students in Colorado Springs and the surrounding area. Our Mission is to "Prepare and inspire students to become lifelong learners and responsible citizens through rigorous…

Education
2
Center for Nonprofit Excellence

The Center for Nonprofit Excellence strengthens Southern Colorado's nonprofit sector through leadership and resource development, advocacy and collaboration. Together, with our partners, we are co-creating a vibrant community in the Pikes…

—
3
Pta Colorado Congress
Education
4
Pikes Peak School of Expeditionary Learning

Provide education for students in Pre-K through 8th grade, benefitting approximately 415 students.

Education
5
Womens Comm Leadership Initiative

WCLI empowers women in Colorado Springs to realize their full leadership potential, breakdown barriers to advancement, create a more inclusive and equitable community for all.

Employment
6
In Colorado Initiative for Inclusive Higher Education

Develop college pathways for students with intellectual disabilities.

Education
7
La Plata Youth Services

La Plata Youth Services, Inc. supports and advocates for youth facing challenges in school, home and court.

Crime & Legal
8
Colorado Learning Connections

Through individualized learning and responsive mentoring, we inspire, guide and empower students and families.

Education
9
Colorado Press Association

Promote the general interest of daily, weekly, and monthly newspapers and online publications, improve editorials and business methods of daily and weekly newspapers, and advance those newspapers' usefulness and influence in the public…

—
10
The Colorado Parks Foundation Inc
Recreation & Sports
11
Spira Giving Colorado
Arts & Culture
12
Colorado Music Bridge

Colorado nbsp;music nbsp;bridge nbsp;provides nbsp;access nbsp;to nbsp;inclusive nbsp;modern nbsp;music nbsp;education nbsp;programs nbsp;curricular nbsp;resources nbsp;and nbsp;professional nbsp;development

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Partnership for Child Development; the most unlike its peers is Staging Her. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INNERCHANGE WORKS: $5,773 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,450 · Other+69 more: $110,773 · Other+69 morePeak Education: $11,000 · EducationPeak Educatio…Atlas Preparatory School Inc: $3,300 · EducationAtlas Prepara…Children's Literacy Center Inc: $2,000 · EducationChildren's Li…COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY- PUEBLO FOUNDATION: $1,500 · EducationCOLORADO STAT…COOL SCIENCE: $1,000 · EducationCommunity Partnership for Child Development: $1,000 · EducationMINDS MATTER COLORADO INC: $8,900 · Youth DevelopmentYouth Documentary Academy: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentStaging Her: $1,814 · Arts & CultureCOLORADO SPRINGS PIONEERS MUSEUM: $1,500 · Arts & CultureROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $150 · Arts & CultureKIDS ON BIKES INC: $2,500 · Public Safety & DisasterPIKES PEAK UNITED WAY: $2,000 · PhilanthropyI THIRST INTERNATIONAL: $2,000 · InternationalThe Place: $1,234 · Human Services
Other$120,996Education$19,800Youth Development$10,900Arts & Culture$3,464Public Safety & Disaster$2,500Philanthropy$2,000International$2,000Human Services$1,234

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPeak Education: $11,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMINDS MATTER COLORADO INC: $8,900 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetLeadership Pikes Peak: $3,700 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetAtlas Preparatory School Inc: $3,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS ON BIKES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetChildren's Literacy Center Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPIKES PEAK UNITED WAY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCIVICO: $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetStaging Her: $1,814 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY- PUEBLO FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO SPRINGS PIONEERS MUSEUM: $1,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe Place: $1,234 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOL SCIENCE: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCommunity Partnership for Child Development: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Peak Education ↗
  • Who funds MINDS MATTER COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Pikes Peak ↗
  • Who funds Atlas Preparatory School Inc ↗
  • Who funds KIDS ON BIKES INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Literacy Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds PIKES PEAK UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds I THIRST INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Youth Documentary Academy ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Joseph Henry Edmondson FoundationCO30.4× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Joseph Henry Edmondson Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Pikes Peak Community Foundation · The Hester E & Edwin W Giddings Foundation · Colorado Springs Health Foundation · Jerome V Bruni Foundation · The Myron Stratton Home · Pikes Peak United Way · The Anschutz Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Dusty and Katherine Loo Foundation Dba Bloom Foundation · The Moniker Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William Stanley Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William Stanley Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to William Stanley Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to William Stanley Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William Stanley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph