Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

William O Nutting Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$125k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20182024.

Education$359kPhilanthropy$33kArts & Culture$32kHealth$29kHuman Services$21kInternational$6kSocial Science$5kCivil Rights$3kOther$29k
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $71k
$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
T ROWE PRICE CHARITABLE$30,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$25,000
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$16,000
THE SOUP KITCHEN OF GREATER WHEELING$5,000
CARNEGIE MUSEUMS OF PITTSBURGH$5,000
HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY$5,000
BRAVE BEHIND BARS$5,000
HARVARD ART MUSEUMS$5,000
JOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION$5,000
WVU FOUNDATION$5,000
THE GUGGENHEIM MUSEUMS AND FOUNDATION$5,000
UNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER$5,000
THE STEAM CONNECTION$2,500
THE HARVARD LAMPOON TRUST$2,500
ASPEN ART MUSEUM$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION: $5k → 20%JOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION: $5k → 20%JOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION: $5k → 20%JOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION: $5k → 20%JOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION: $1k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
CO
WV
MD
DC
AL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 39% of William O Nutting Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

William O Nutting Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$245k · 7 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

$245k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+11%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHealthHuman ServicesInternationalCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMY
    2× · 2018–2019 · $98k · revenue +8%
  • NY
    New York University
    5× · 2020–2024 · $92k · revenue +45%
  • JOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $21k · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +8%
  • THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +159%
  • EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue -63%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

6
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
7
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
8
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
9
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
10
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
11
Harvard Club of Washington Dc

To inform and enrich the intellectual lives of 20,000 alumni of harvard university in the washington, dc area and to assist harvard university with respect to applicants and undergraduates from the dc area.

Education
12
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Aspen Institute Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Soup Kitchen of Greater Wheeling Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr16%45%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%62%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/23
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,542

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
11/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $135,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIATRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMY — $98,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMYNew York University — $92,000 · EducationNew York UniversityUCLA FOUNDATION — $15,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $14,000 · Education+1 more — $5,000 · EducationT ROWE PRICE PROGRAM FOR CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $30,000 · PhilanthropyHARVARD LAMPOON TRUST — $2,500 · PhilanthropyASPEN ART MUSEUM — $12,000 · Arts & CultureHARVARD LAMPOON INC — $11,949 · Arts & CultureCARNEGIE INSTITUTE — $5,000 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S MEDIA FOUNDATION — $2,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $1,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $25,000 · HealthASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $4,000 · HealthBRAVE BEHIND BARS — $5,000 · OtherHOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY — $5,000 · OtherTHE GUGGENHEIM MUSEUMS AND FOUNDATION — $5,000 · OtherUNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER — $5,000 · OtherTHE SOUP KITCHEN OF GREATER WHEELING INC — $5,000 · OtherThe Steam Connection — $2,500 · OtherTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $5,000 · OtherEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $2,500 · Other+1 more — $1,000 · OtherJOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION — $21,000 · Human ServicesCLOONEY FOUNDATION FOR JUSTICE — $6,000 · International
Education$359,000Philanthropy$32,500Arts & Culture$32,449Health$29,000Other$36,000Human Services$21,000International$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $135,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMY — $98,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University — $92,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetT ROWE PRICE PROGRAM FOR CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION — $21,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $14,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN ART MUSEUM — $12,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHARVARD LAMPOON INC — $11,949 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetCLOONEY FOUNDATION FOR JUSTICE — $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARNEGIE INSTITUTE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SOUP KITCHEN OF GREATER WHEELING INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARVARD LAMPOON TRUST — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S MEDIA FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASIAN ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION OF SAN FRANCISCO — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization William O Nutting Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to William O Nutting Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to William O Nutting Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph