· Private foundation
William F & Moonyeen Reynolds Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $28k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Interfaith Outreach Services | $10,000 |
| The Kitchen | $10,000 |
| Salvation Army | $10,000 |
| Faith Mission | $10,000 |
| Wichita Falls Area Food Bank | $10,000 |
| Vernon College Foundation | $5,000 |
| Midwestern State University | $5,000 |
| Boys & Girls Clubs of Wichita Falls | $5,000 |
| Presbyterian Manor | $5,000 |
| Chesterton Academy | $5,000 |
| Presbyterian Manor | $1,000 |
| Rathgeber Hospitality House | $1,000 |
| Boy Scouts of America Northwest TX Council | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $97k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WFWICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK7× · 2019–2025 · $66k · revenue +48%
- SCSENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC DBA THE KITCHEN7× · 2019–2025 · $58k · revenue +15%
- PMPresbyterian Manor Inc6× · 2020–2025 · $39k · revenue +37%
Funded once
- WFWichita Falls Symphony Orchestragraduatedone grant, 2019 · $350 · revenue +80%
- CFCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCHone grant, 2020 · $300 · revenue +23%
- TATHE ARC OF WICHITA COUNTY INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $300 · revenue +67%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Care, hope, and support for all when illness threatens life.
To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.
The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…
The mission of the Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation is to enhance the quality of life in the Wichita Falls area through the promotion and support of charitable giving. Our vision is to build strong, vibrant communities inspired by…
Enriching western Kansas life through philanthropy, collaboration and leadership.
To educate the community and its visitors about local history by collecting, preserving and interpreting materials reflecting the heritage of wichita and sedgwick county
Love and caring are the center of life at Rolling Meadows. Rolling Meadows was founded on the biblical belief that each person's life is a gift from God and is meant to be lived in dignity, comfort and security. Rolling Meadows seeks to…
At wichita habitat for humanity, we believe everyone deserves the strength, stability, and independence that comes with a safe, affordable home. we partner with hardworking individuals and families in our community, empowering them to…
To operate nonprofit hospitals or hospital facilities, clinics, and related medical and surgical services by providing such services to persons that do have the ability to pay, and to thereby provide charitable medical, surgical, and…
The witte museum inspires people to shape the future of texas through transformative and relevant experiences in nature, science and culture.
Wplf seeks private charitable support to create young readers, ensure digital inclusion, and provide equitable access to information. wplf's sole purpose is to create a margin of excellence at wichita public library.
Meals on Wheels of Odessa enables people to live with dignity by offering community support and sustenance through coordinated services and enable older adults to live in their own homes safely and independently as long as they are able.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wichita Falls Area Food Bank and the most unlike its peers is The National World War Ii Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC DBA THE KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds Presbyterian Manor Inc ↗
- Who funds THE BOYS CLUB OF WICHITA FALLS INC DBA BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WICHITA FALLS ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS PANTRY ↗
- Who funds VERNON COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds Rathgeber Hospitality House ↗
- Who funds Physicians For Peace ↗
- Who funds Wichita Falls Symphony Orchestra ↗
- Who funds CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF WICHITA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds The Museum of North Texas History ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Fain Foundation · James N McCoy Foundation · Donnell Foundation · J S Bridwell Foundation · Bryant Edwards Foundation Inc · Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation · Kadane Foundation · Gene Conley Foundation · Guinn Foundation Inc · Perkins-Prothro Foundation · The Priddy Foundation · Snell Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization William F & Moonyeen Reynolds Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to William F & Moonyeen Reynolds Foundation?
Find your warmest path to William F & Moonyeen Reynolds Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.