Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Snell Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$219k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$464kYouth Development$426kHealth$179kFood & Nutrition$177kEducation$130kPhilanthropy$60kReligion$46kEnvironment$41kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $133k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Boys & Girls Club of Vernon$50,000
Red River Valley Museum$25,000
Lubbock EntertainmentPerforming Arts Association$25,000
Wichit Falls Symphony Orchastra$22,500
Texoma Alliance to Stop Abuse$20,000
Wichit Falls Area Food Bank$20,000
Meals on Wheels$10,000
Vernon College Foundation$10,000
Rathgerber Hospitality House$7,500
Tunnel to Towers$7,500
Individual grant recipient$7,500
River Bend Nature Center$6,500
Interfaith Ministries Inc$5,000
Midwestern State University$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Tunnel to Towers: $8k → 11%Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children: $10k → 14%Wichit Falls Symphony Orchastra: $23k → 16%Red River Valley Museum: $25k → 17%Lubbock EntertainmentPerforming Arts Association: $25k → 17%Nashvill Opra: $7k → 14%Tunnel to Towers: $8k → 11%Interfaith Ministries Inc: $10k → 16%Red River Valley Museum: $25k → 17%Lubbock EntertainmentPerforming Arts Association: $25k → 17%Nashvill Opra: $7k → 14%Rathgerber Hospitality House: $8k → 16%Red River Valley Museum: $25k → 17%Lubbock EntertainmentPerforming Arts Association: $25k → 17%Rathgerber Hospitality House: $8k → 16%Red River Valley Museum: $25k → 17%Lubbock EntertainmentPerforming Arts Association: $25k → 17%River Bend Nature Center: $7k → 16%Red River Valley Museum: $25k → 17%Lubbock EntertainmentPerforming Arts Association: $25k → 17%River Bend Nature Center: $7k → 16%Red River Valley Museum: $25k → 17%Lubbock EntertainmentPerforming Arts Association: $25k → 17%River Bend Nature Center: $7k → 16%Red River Valley Museum: $20k → 17%Lubbock EntertainmentPerforming Arts Association: $25k → 17%River Bend Nature Center: $7k → 16%Texoma Alliance to Stop Abuse: $20k → 17%Lubbock EntertainmentPerforming Arts Association: $25k → 17%Rathgerber Hospitality House: $6k → 16%Red River Valley Museum: $20k → 17%Texoma Alliance to Stop Abuse: $20k → 17%Texoma Alliance to Stop Abuse: $20k → 17%Red River Valley Museum: $15k → 17%Vernon College Foundation: $10k → 17%Vernon College Foundation: $10k → 17%Vernon College Foundation: $10k → 17%Vernon College Foundation: $10k → 17%Vernon College Foundation: $10k → 17%Vernon College Foundation: $10k → 17%Vernon College Foundation: $10k → 17%Vernon College Foundation: $10k → 17%Faith Refuge - Wichita Falls Faith Mission: $8k → 16%Faith Refuge - Wichita Falls Faith Mission: $8k → 16%Faith Refuge - Wichita Falls Faith Mission: $8k → 16%Faith Refuge - Wichita Falls Faith Mission: $8k → 16%Faith Refuge - Wichita Falls Faith Mission: $8k → 16%PETS Low Cost Spay & Neuter Clinic: $20k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 16 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
3

Total granted

$1.6M
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+76%

Still filing today

63%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyReligionFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    Boys and Girls Club of Vernon Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $426k · revenue +70%
  • RR
    Red River Valley Museum
    9× · 2017–2025 · $205k · revenue +126%
  • LE
    LUBBOCK ENTERTAINMENT AND PERFORMING ARTS ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $200k · revenue +121%

Funded once

  • PL
    PETS LOW COST SPAY & NEUTERgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +76%
  • TS
    TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDRENgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +37%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +134%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
West Texas Food Bank

The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…

2
Food Bank of West Central Texas

To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.

Food & Nutrition
3
Hospice of Wichita Falls Inc

Care, hope, and support for all when illness threatens life.

Human Services
4
Wilbarger Humane Society

Care for abandoned animals in vernon and wilbarger county, tx including spay, neuter, adoption and education.

Animals
5
Meals On Wheels of Odessa Inc

Meals on Wheels of Odessa enables people to live with dignity by offering community support and sustenance through coordinated services and enable older adults to live in their own homes safely and independently as long as they are able.

6
Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation

The mission of the Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation is to enhance the quality of life in the Wichita Falls area through the promotion and support of charitable giving. Our vision is to build strong, vibrant communities inspired by…

Philanthropy
7
Waskom Volunteer Fire Department & Ems Services Inc

Firefighter & emergency medical services for the waskom, tx area.

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Visiting Nurse Association of Texas

Established in 1934, vna helps older adults live with dignity and independence at home by providing in-home care, food and friendship for the ill, hungry, and homebound.

Health
9
Fix West Texas

Fix West Texas mission is to lower the local euthanasia rate dogs and cats put to sleep in our local shelter due to lack of space and to lower intakes number of dogs and cats taken in by the local shelter and local rescues in our West…

Animals
10
High Plains Food Bank

The High Plains Food Bank exists to help solve the issue of hunger and food insecurity in the Texas Panhandle.

11
West Texas Hero Homes Inc

Support of special needs military or first responders and their families.

Housing & Shelter
12
Visiting Nurse Association of Texas Foundation

Supports visiting nurse association of texas, who's mission is to provide care to our community, enhancing health and well being with compassion, dignity and integrity.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wichita Falls Symphony Orchestra and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
13/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Boys and Girls Club of Vernon Inc — $426,000 · OtherBoys and Girls Club of Vernon IncVERNON COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $85,000 · OtherVERNON COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCORPORATEDIndividual grant recipient — $57,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientInterfaith Ministries Inc — $46,000 · OtherInterfaith Ministries IncRiver Bend Nature Center — $41,000 · OtherRiver Bend Nature Center+4 more — $68,000 · Other+4 moreRed River Valley Museum — $205,000 · Arts & CultureRed River Valley MuseumLUBBOCK ENTERTAINMENT AND PERFORMING ARTS ASSOCIATION — $200,000 · Arts & CultureLUBBOCK ENTERTAINMENT AND PERFOR…Wichita Falls Symphony Orchestra — $58,500 · Arts & CultureWichita Falls Symphony OrchestraTexoma Alliance to Stop Abuse — $125,000 · HealthTexoma Allia…Rathgeber Hospitality House — $44,000 · HealthRathgeber Ho…TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN — $10,000 · HealthTEXAS SCOTTI…WICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK — $144,500 · Food & NutritionWICHITA FA…Wilbarger County United Fund — $60,000 · PhilanthropyMEALS ON WHEELS — $32,500 · Human ServicesSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Education
Other$723,500Arts & Culture$463,500Health$179,000Food & Nutrition$144,500Philanthropy$60,000Human Services$32,500Education$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBoys and Girls Club of Vernon Inc — $426,000 over 9y, 4.9% of budgetRed River Valley Museum — $205,000 over 9y, 16% of budgetLUBBOCK ENTERTAINMENT AND PERFORMING ARTS ASSOCIATION — $200,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetWICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK — $144,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTexoma Alliance to Stop Abuse — $125,000 over 7y, 20% of budgetVERNON COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $85,000 over 9y, 7.3% of budgetWilbarger County United Fund — $60,000 over 4y, 18% of budgetWichita Falls Symphony Orchestra — $58,500 over 9y, 2.6% of budgetRathgeber Hospitality House — $44,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS — $32,500 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPETS LOW COST SPAY & NEUTER — $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Boys and Girls Club of Vernon Inc
  • Who funds Red River Valley Museum
  • Who funds LUBBOCK ENTERTAINMENT AND PERFORMING ARTS ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds WICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK
  • Who funds Texoma Alliance to Stop Abuse
  • Who funds VERNON COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED
  • Who funds Wilbarger County United Fund
  • Who funds Wichita Falls Symphony Orchestra
  • Who funds Rathgeber Hospitality House
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PETS LOW COST SPAY & NEUTER
  • Who funds TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gene Conley FoundationMO20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gene Conley Foundation · The Fain Foundation · Bryant Edwards Foundation Inc · J S Bridwell Foundation · Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation · E Paul & Helen Buck Waggoner Foundation Inc · James N McCoy Foundation · The Priddy Foundation · William F & Moonyeen Reynolds Foundation · Donnell Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Snell Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Snell Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Snell Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph