Skip to content

· Private foundation

William and Lorene Nefsy Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$83k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$428kEducation$140kPhilanthropy$31kYouth Development$29kArts & Culture$21kPublic Safety & Disaster$16kHealth$13kCivil Rights$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $72k
$12,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Friends of Beaver Creek Lodge Inc$20,000
Individual grant recipient$16,500
Fergus Wrestling Club Inc$12,000
Beaverhead County High School$12,000
Wild Horse Sports Association$11,500
Bonner School District$7,000
WaterWorks Art Museum$3,500
Huntley Project Museum$750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Eagle Mount Billings: $9k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

18%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$128k · 7 repeat orgs$594k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
62

Total granted

$128k
$515k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-27%
+24%

Still filing today

43%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthAnimalsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    BOZEMAN SPORTS PARK FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2018–2022 · $63k · revenue -42%
  • WA
    WATERWORKS ART MUSEUM
    7× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue -27%
  • BC
    BILLINGS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • MC
    MILES COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • UW
    UM Western Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $48k
  • DC
    Dawson Community College Athletics
    one grant, 2023 · $35k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Scenic Montana Trails
—
2
Montana Healthcare Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Friends of Beaverhead County Fair

Provide funding for the improvement & enhancement of the Beaverhead County Fairgrounds.

Education
4
Blaine County Wildlife Museum Foundation

To establish and operate the blaine county wildlife museum with the intent to provide quality wildlife museum exhibiting montana wildlife in their natural habitats, complete with audio and visual enhancement.

Arts & Culture
5
Montana Pro Rodeo Hall and Wall of Fame

To honor montana professional rodeo cowboys and cowgirls who exemplify montana western heritage.

Arts & Culture
6
Headwaters Trail System

To build and maintain trails in the Missouri River Headwaters Area.

Environment
7
Montana Pool Service Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Montana Pediatric Cancer Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Whitefish Sports Facilities Foundation

To promote healthy lifestyles and physical fitness by operating, improving and maintaining an ice rink facility for youth activities and public benefit for the city of whitefish, montana. the ice rink facility is owned by the city of…

Recreation & Sports
10
Central Montana Shooting Complex in

Teaching and supporting shooting sports

Recreation & Sports
11
Beaverhead Trails Coalition

Enhancement and development of trails on public lands in Beaverhead County

Environment
12
Miles City Convent Keepers

To preserve the architectual integrity of the structure and the significance of the miles city academy building as it relates to eastern montana's history

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bozeman Sports Park Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Fair View Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
10/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MILES COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $50,000 · OtherMILES COMMUNITY COLLEGEUM Western Foundation: $48,000 · OtherUM Western FoundationDawson Community College Athletics: $35,000 · OtherDawson Community College AthleticsMSU Northern Foundation: $30,000 · OtherMSU Northern FoundationSidney Boys & Girls Club: $20,000 · OtherFriends of Beaver Creek Lodge Inc: $20,000 · OtherMCFCarter County CF Fund: $18,500 · Other+55 more: $314,737 · Other+55 moreBOZEMAN SPORTS PARK FOUNDATION INC: $62,750 · Recreation & SportsBOZEMAN SPORT…Pondera Rec Association: $12,500 · Recreation & SportsPondera Rec A…MILES CITY YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $6,600 · Recreation & SportsMILES CITY YO…SIDNEY TIGER SHARKS INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsSIDNEY TIGER …+1 more: $125 · Recreation & SportsMONTANA CENTER FOR HORSEMANSHIP INC: $30,000 · AnimalsBILLINGS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $14,500 · EducationBelgrade Community Library Foundation: $5,000 · EducationBILLINGS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC: $5,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION: $4,000 · EducationWILDHORSE SPORTS ASSOCIATION: $11,500 · Youth DevelopmentMILES CITY YOUTH BASEBALL ASSOCIATION: $6,500 · Youth DevelopmentWATERWORKS ART MUSEUM: $17,500 · Arts & CultureBarrett Hospital Foundation Inc: $7,500 · HealthPONDERA HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Health
Other$536,237Recreation & Sports$86,975Animals$30,000Education$28,500Youth Development$18,000Arts & Culture$17,500Health$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOZEMAN SPORTS PARK FOUNDATION INC: $62,750 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetWATERWORKS ART MUSEUM: $17,500 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetBILLINGS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $14,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPondera Rec Association: $12,500 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetWILDHORSE SPORTS ASSOCIATION: $11,500 over 1y, 23% of budgetEAGLE MOUNT BILLINGS: $8,738 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBarrett Hospital Foundation Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCENTRAL MONTANA FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMILES CITY YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $6,600 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetMILES CITY YOUTH BASEBALL ASSOCIATION: $6,500 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetBelgrade Community Library Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetBILLINGS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEAR PAW VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2,887 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetFAIR VIEW FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 14% of budgetHuntley Project Museum: $750 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOZEMAN SPORTS PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA CENTER FOR HORSEMANSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds WATERWORKS ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds BILLINGS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Pondera Rec Association ↗
  • Who funds WILDHORSE SPORTS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds EAGLE MOUNT BILLINGS ↗
  • Who funds Barrett Hospital Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL MONTANA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MILES CITY YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MILES CITY YOUTH BASEBALL ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Town Pump Charitable FoundationMT21.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Town Pump Charitable Foundation · Montana Community Foundation Inc · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Albert & E Bender Foundation Inc · Gianforte Family Charitable Trust · Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William and Lorene Nefsy Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William and Lorene Nefsy Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to William and Lorene Nefsy Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to William and Lorene Nefsy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William and Lorene Nefsy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph