Skip to content

· Private foundation

William and Karen Lavoie Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$126k
Granted FY2025still arriving
48
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Environment$343kArts & Culture$271kAnimals$38kReligion$29kFood & Nutrition$25kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kRecreation & Sports$20kEducation$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 48 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k46 grants · $73k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $53k
$1,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KCET PBS SO CAL$28,000
SAVE THE REDWOOD LEAGUE$25,000
CALIFORNIA MASONIC FOUNDATION CO GRAND LODGE OF CALIFORNIA$5,000
OCEAN INSTITUTE$5,000
SHRINE TRANSPORTATION FUND$5,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$4,000
SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION$3,000
893 KPCC$3,000
MARINE MAMMAL CARE$2,500
KCRW$2,500
CA STATE PARK FOUNDATION$2,500
ENVIROMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$2,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$2,000
WORLD FOOD PROGRAM$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 66% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KCET PBS SO CAL: $28k → 10%SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%Save the Redwood League: $50k → 10%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $4k → 17%Masonic Service Assoc of NA: $5k → 8%Sierra Club Foundation: $5k → 10%Save the Redwood League: $37k → 10%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $4k → 17%Sierra Club Foundation: $5k → 10%SAVE THE REDWOOD LEAGUE: $35k → 10%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $3k → 17%International Ocean Institute: $11k → 10%Sierra Club Foundation: $3k → 10%SAVE THE REDWOOD LEAGUE: $25k → 10%International Ocean Institute: $6k → 10%SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%SAVE THE REDWOOD LEAGUE: $25k → 10%PBS PUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE: $27k → 7%SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%SAVE THE REDWOOD LEAGUE: $25k → 10%PBS PUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE: $27k → 7%SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%SAVE THE REDWOOD LEAGUE: $25k → 10%PBS Public Broadcasting Service: $27k → 7%SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%Save the Redwood League: $15k → 10%WETA PBS NEWS HOUR: $25k → 7%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN: $13k → 14%CALIFORNIA MASONIC FOUNDATION CO GRAND LODGE OF CALIFORNIA: $5k → 10%World Central Kitchen: $5k → 14%WETAPBS News Hour: $25k → 7%CALIFORNIA MASONIC FOUNDATION CO GRAND LODGE OF CALIFORNIA: $5k → 10%CALIFORNIA MASONIC FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%WETA PBS NEWS HOUR: $25k → 7%SHRINERS FOR CHILDREN MEDICAL CENTER: $5k → 14%SHRINERS FOR CHILDREN MEDICAL CENTER: $5k → 14%893 KPCC: $3k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY: $4k → 14%Costumers Guild West: $3k → 14%MARINE MAMMAL CARE: $4k → 14%MARINE MAMMAL CARE: $4k → 14%Cabrillo Museum: $4k → 14%MARINE MAMMAL CARE: $3k → 14%FIDM Museum: $4k → 14%SHRINE TRANSPORTATION FUND: $5k → 14%AL MALIAKAH SHRINE TRANSPORTATION FUND: $3k → 14%SHRINE TRANSPORTATION FUND: $3k → 14%SHRINE TRANSPORTATION FUND: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
AR
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$867k · 66 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

66 repeat relationships: 44 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

66
18

Total granted

$867k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
0%

Still filing today

50%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureAnimalsInternationalPublic BenefitEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST
    SAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $237k · revenue +59%
  • PB
    PUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE
    5× · 2018–2022 · $83k · revenue +29%
  • OI
    OCEAN INSTITUTE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $26k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • MS
    Masonic Service Assoc of NA
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • AM
    AL MALIAKAH SHRINE TRANSPORTATION FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
2
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
3
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
4
San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory

The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.

Environment
5
California Ocean Science Trust

California ocean science trust (ost) is a non-profit organization dedicated to accelerating progress towards a healthy and productive ocean future for california. created by state legislation, ost bridges the gap between cutting-edge…

Environment
6
Zoological Society of San Diego

San diego zoo wildlife alliance is committed to saving species worldwide by uniting our expertise in wildlife care and conservation science with our dedication to inspiring passion for nature.

Animals
7
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
8
San Francisco Zoological Society

To connect all people with wildlife, inspire caring for nature, and advance conservation action.

Animals
9
Sacramento Zoological Society

The sacramento zoo inspires appreciation, respect and a connection with wildlife and nature through education, recreation and conservation.

Animals
10
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
11
Los Angeles Conservancy

The los angeles conservancy is a nonprofit membership organization that works through education and advocacy to recognize, preserve, and revitalize the historic architectural and cultural resources of los angeles county.

Arts & Culture
12
Parks California

As california state parks' statutory non-profit partner, we have a clear mission - to help strengthen parks and inspire all people to experience these extraordinary places.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals; the most unlike its peers is Carson Cats Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/41
Grantees still filing
25/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKCET PBS SO CAL: $32,000 · OtherKCET PBS SO CALMARINE MAMMAL CARE: $18,500 · OtherCA STATE PARK FOUNDATION: $17,500 · OtherInternational Ocean Institute: $16,500 · OtherMasonic Homes of Calif: $15,000 · OtherKCRW: $15,000 · Other+56 more: $192,604 · Other+56 moreSAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE: $237,000 · EnvironmentSAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUESIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION+6 more: $26,500 · Environment+6 morePUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE: $82,744 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC BROADCAS…Colonial Williamsburg Foundation: $12,432 · Arts & CultureColonial Willia…BALTIMORE MUSEUM OF INDUSTRY INC: $8,000 · Arts & CultureBALTIMORE MUSEU…SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO: $6,506 · Arts & CultureSOUTHERN CALIFO…Costumer's Guild West Inc: $5,493 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $6,200 · Arts & CultureWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $24,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $16,500 · InternationalOCEAN INSTITUTE: $25,500 · ReligionINTERNATIONAL BIRD RESCUE: $11,000 · AnimalsMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $6,000 · AnimalsAQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION: $3,000 · AnimalsSANTA BARBARA HUMANE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,500 · AnimalsPEDRO PET PALS INC: $1,000 · Animals+1 more: $500 · AnimalsFeeding America: $15,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$382,104Environment$293,500Arts & Culture$121,375International$41,000Religion$25,500Animals$23,000Food & Nutrition$15,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE: $237,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetPUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE: $82,744 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN INSTITUTE: $25,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $24,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $16,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $15,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $12,432 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BIRD RESCUE: $11,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREENPEACE INC: $9,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBALTIMORE MUSEUM OF INDUSTRY INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPLUG IN AMERICA: $8,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHEAL THE BAY: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO: $6,506 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCostumer's Guild West Inc: $5,493 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetSEMPERVIRENS FUND: $5,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTORRANCE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5,250 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $3,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMINI THERAPY HORSES: $3,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTREEPEOPLE INC: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetShakespeare By The Sea: $3,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA MASONIC FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,200 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetELDERHOSTEL INC: $2,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budget350ORG: $1,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA BARBARA HUMANE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPEDRO PET PALS INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF MADRONA MARSH: $1,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetOceanographic Teaching Stations Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCULTURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA MARIA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCarson Cats Rescue: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Center for Investigative Reporting formrly Foundation for National Progress: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds Colonial Williamsburg Foundation ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL BIRD RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds GREENPEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds BALTIMORE MUSEUM OF INDUSTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds PLUG IN AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds HEAL THE BAY ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Costumer's Guild West Inc ↗
  • Who funds SEMPERVIRENS FUND ↗
  • Who funds TORRANCE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sempra FoundationCA11.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sempra Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William and Karen Lavoie Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William and Karen Lavoie Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Baltimore Museum of Industry Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to William and Karen Lavoie Foundation?

Find your warmest path to William and Karen Lavoie Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 89 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on William and Karen Lavoie’s filings →

More from the funding graph