Skip to content

· Private foundation

William and Joan Feldman Family Foundation Inc

$22k
Granted FY2021
8
Grants FY2021
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Education$298kPhilanthropy$185kInternational$76kArts & Culture$68kHealth$42kRecreation & Sports$26kHuman Services$15kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kOther$0
02FY2021 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k7 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARMONY PROJECT$10,000
LEE PESKY LEARNING CENTER$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
MIDDLE EAST INSTITUTE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
FEEDING AMERICA$1,000
GRIFFIN MUSEUM OF PHOTOGRAPHY$1,000
Individual grant recipient$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GIRAFFE LAUGH INC: $5k → 8%EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
WI
NY
MA
OH
CA
MD
KS
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$715k · 24 repeat orgs$115k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +49% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2021, 20 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
50

Total granted

$715k
$110k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+49%

Still filing today

50%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
EducationArts & CultureInternationalPhilanthropyHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    4× · 2017–2020 · $30k · revenue +53%
  • SUN VALLEY WRITERS' CONFERENCE INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $24k · revenue +89%
  • HP
    Harmony Project
    5× · 2017–2021 · $20k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ELNETgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +60%
  • UR
    UC REGENTS
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • SJ
    ST JOHN RURAL RELIEF
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
2
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
3
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
6
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
7
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
8
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
9
American Society for Technion Israel Institute of Technology Inc

The american technion society supports the technion's critical research and (continued on sch o)

International
10
Bureau of Jewish Education of Greater Los Angeles Inc

Bje enhances the quality of, increases access to, and encourages participation in jewish education throughout the jewish communities of greater los angeles. bje is an advocate, planner, catalyst, and creative leader for strengthening and…

Religion
11
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
12
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Simon Wiesenthal Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
23/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $261,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJEWISH FEDERATION GREATER LA: $153,400 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION GREATER LAIndividual grant recipient: $61,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFELNET: $25,000 · OtherTHE FIRST TEE: $25,000 · Other+51 more: $127,629 · Other+51 moreUCLA FOUNDATION: $268,250 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONSUN VALLEY WRITERS' CONFERENCE INC: $24,000 · EducationSUN VALLEY WRITERS' CONFERENCE INCHarmony Project: $20,250 · EducationHarmony Project+5 more: $24,000 · Education+5 moreFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $30,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF ELNET: $25,000 · InternationalTHE MIDDLE EAST INSTITUTE: $13,500 · International+1 more: $400 · InternationalCONCERN FOUNDATION: $18,000 · PhilanthropyMATTHEW SILVERMAN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $1,250 · PhilanthropySUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC: $8,657 · Arts & CultureProject Miracle: $2,000 · Arts & CultureTHE GRIFFIN MUSEUM OF PHOTOGRAPHY INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureACADEMY FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $300 · Arts & CultureGIRAFFE LAUGH INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesEXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Human ServicesFeeding America: $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$653,779Education$336,500International$68,900Philanthropy$19,250Arts & Culture$12,957Human Services$6,000Food & Nutrition$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $268,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ELNET: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSUN VALLEY WRITERS' CONFERENCE INC: $24,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHarmony Project: $20,250 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCONCERN FOUNDATION: $18,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MIDDLE EAST INSTITUTE: $13,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBeit T'Shuvah: $11,900 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLEE PESKY LEARNING CENTER INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC: $8,657 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH WORLD WATCH: $6,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE PLATO SOCIETY OF LOS ANGELES: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGIRAFFE LAUGH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetProject Miracle: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GRIFFIN MUSEUM OF PHOTOGRAPHY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBRENTWOOD SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACADEMY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLCREST COUNTRY CLUB: $425 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ELNET ↗
  • Who funds SUN VALLEY WRITERS' CONFERENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Harmony Project ↗
  • Who funds CONCERN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MIDDLE EAST INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Beit T'Shuvah ↗
  • Who funds LEE PESKY LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH WORLD WATCH ↗
  • Who funds THE PLATO SOCIETY OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds GIRAFFE LAUGH INC ↗
  • Who funds Project Miracle ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MATTHEW SILVERMAN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Feldman Family Foundation IncCA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Feldman Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · California Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William and Joan Feldman Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William and Joan Feldman Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • The Griffin Museum of Photography Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to William and Joan Feldman Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to William and Joan Feldman Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on William and Joan Feldman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph