Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Willam T & Susana D Huston Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$440k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$440k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 73% of Willam T & Susana D Huston Family Foundation’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$440,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation$440,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Solutions for Change: $5k → 11%Solutions for Change: $2k → 11%Wells of Life: $21k → 10%Wells of Life: $11k → 10%Wells of Life: $8k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MT
MI
NY
OR
CA
CO
NE
AZ
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.4M · 37 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 36 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
7

Total granted

$2.4M
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+146%

Still filing today

43%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureRecreation & SportsInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    Friends of Rancho San Pedro
    5× · 2020–2024 · $192k · revenue +74%
  • PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $146k · revenue +109%
  • FT
    Future Talent of Silicon Valley
    5× · 2020–2024 · $69k · revenue +133%

Funded once

  • SJ
    St John Vianney Theological Seminar
    one grant, 2024 · $28k
  • PC
    Pregnancy Center of San Gabriel Val
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • SC
    SANTA CATALINA ISLAND CONSERVANCYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +146%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne
Recreation & Sports
2
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
3
Ucsf Health Community Hospitals Fka Saint Francis Memorial Hospital

Ucsf health community hospital's mission statement is caring, healing, teaching, and discovering.

Health
4
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
5
Pacific Central Coast Health Centers

Pacific central coast health centers', sponsored by dignity community care, mission is to provide access to cost effective, quality medical services in the northern santa barbara county, san luis obispo county, kern county and ventura…

Health
6
Sempervirens Fund

To ensure coast redwood forests in the santa cruz mountains thrive for generations to come. since 1900, sempervirens has protected more than 36,000 acres. learn more about our mission, vision, and strategic plan through 2030 at:…

Environment
7
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
8
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
9
Chile-California Council

The Chile-California Council is a San Francisco-based nonprofit dedicated to developing and promoting joint endeavors and cooperative relations between Chile and California, as well as individuals, legal entities and other institutions in…

International
10
California Pacific Medical Center Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
11
Catholic Charities of Santa Clara County

Catholic charities of santa clara county serves and advocates for families and individuals in need, especially those living in poverty. rooted in gospel values, we work to create a more just and compassionate community in which people of…

Human Services
12
San Francisco Family Foundation

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sacred Heart Retreat House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Catalina Chimes Tower Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 49 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%29%10–20yr17%19%20–35yr11%10%35–55yr13%43%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%16%10–20yr17%31%20–35yr11%3%35–55yr13%50%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/22
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,956

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Cystic Fibrosis Foundation — $519,500 · OtherCystic Fibrosis FoundationSt Bede the Venerable — $295,000 · OtherSt Bede the VenerableIndividual grant recipient — $116,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST LAWRENCE BRINDISI SCHOOL — $115,500 · OtherST LAWRENCE BRINDISI SCHOOLSts Peter Paul School — $91,000 · OtherCristo Rey San Jose HS — $72,000 · OtherSt Edward Retreat Center — $69,000 · Other+27 more — $519,500 · Other+27 moreFriends of Rancho San Pedro — $192,000 · Arts & CulturePARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC — $146,000 · HealthTHE BRIAN GRANT FOUNDATION — $10,000 · HealthCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY — $54,500 · EducationPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY — $28,000 · EducationWELLS OF LIFE INC — $39,500 · Human ServicesCHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF MONTEREY BAY INC — $35,000 · Human ServicesSOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC — $7,000 · Human ServicesFuture Talent of Silicon Valley — $69,000 · Recreation & SportsAmigos For Christ Inc — $61,000 · International
Other$1,798,000Arts & Culture$192,000Health$156,000Education$82,500Human Services$81,500Recreation & Sports$69,000International$61,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFriends of Rancho San Pedro — $192,000 over 5y, 7.2% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC — $146,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFuture Talent of Silicon Valley — $69,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetAmigos For Christ Inc — $61,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY — $54,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWELLS OF LIFE INC — $39,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF MONTEREY BAY INC — $35,000 over 5y, 7.6% of budgetPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY — $28,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSACRED HEART RETREAT HOUSE INC — $25,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCATHOLIC BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC — $24,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetSAMARITAN HOUSE — $19,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDAVIS PHINNEY FOUNDATION — $16,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BRIAN GRANT FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTreasures of the Church Inc — $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCatalina Chimes Tower Foundation — $7,500 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetSANTA CATALINA ISLAND CONSERVANCY — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC — $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Friends of Rancho San Pedro
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Future Talent of Silicon Valley
  • Who funds Amigos For Christ Inc
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds WELLS OF LIFE INC
  • Who funds CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF MONTEREY BAY INC
  • Who funds PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds SACRED HEART RETREAT HOUSE INC
  • Who funds CATHOLIC BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC
  • Who funds SAMARITAN HOUSE
  • Who funds DAVIS PHINNEY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE BRIAN GRANT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Treasures of the Church Inc
  • Who funds Catalina Chimes Tower Foundation
  • Who funds SANTA CATALINA ISLAND CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Catholic Community Foundation of Los AngelesCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Catholic Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Northrop Grumman Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Willam T & Susana D Huston Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Willam T & Susana D Huston Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Willam T & Susana D Huston Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph