Skip to content

· Public charity

White Pony Express

Access to good food for all.

$9.5M
Granted FY2021
114
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2021.

Food & Nutrition$13MReligion$3.9MAnimals$585kInternational$403kHuman Services$264kHousing & Shelter$198kHealth$105kEducation$63kOther$0
02FY2021 · 114 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k13 grants · $99k
  • $10k–50k58 grants · $1.6M
  • $50k–250k37 grants · $4.2M
  • $250k+6 grants · $3.6M
$38,875
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Team Jesus$1,489,711
JULY TOTAL$647,279
My Angels$436,757
Living Hope Community Church$411,181
Brothers$310,561
Mt Diablo School District$268,023
Individual grant recipient$226,305
Good Shepherd$206,863
RR Ministries$200,864
Oakley Senior Center$190,053
All-in-One$189,459
Loaves & Fishes Pittsburg$176,174
Hope House$164,471
Individual grant recipient$161,917
VCRC$159,643
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $640k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Love-A-Child: $54k → 9%Love-A-Child: $39k → 9%White Pony Inn: $62k → 9%White Pony Inn: $19k → 9%Trinity Center: $53k → 9%Trinity: $37k → 9%Trinity: $28k → 9%Trinity Center: $15k → 9%Concord House: $42k → 9%Concord House: $40k → 9%Monument Crisis: $34k → 9%SHARE Community: $22k → 9%Team Jesus: $52k → 9%Team Jesus: $33k → 9%Youth Homes: $32k → 9%Alegria: $24k → 9%Alegria: $24k → 9%CORE: $18k → 9%Humanity Way: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16M · 76 repeat orgs$2.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against +0% for those funded once.

76 repeat relationships: 76 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

76
17

Total granted

$16M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+0%

Still filing today

29%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterEducationReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GR
    GREATER RICHMOND INTERFAITH PROGRAM GRIP
    8× · 2017–2024 · $901k · revenue +63%
  • LA
    Loaves and Fishes of Contra Costa
    8× · 2017–2024 · $633k · revenue +130%
  • TC
    TRINITY CENTER WALNUT CREEK
    8× · 2017–2024 · $134k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • LP
    La Palabra de Dios
    one grant, 2020 · $983k
  • MD
    MT DIABLO EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2020 · $51k · revenue -21%
  • IS
    Islamic Society of West Contr
    one grant, 2020 · $46k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bay Area Community Services Housing Corp

Improve the quality of life for individuals in Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Solano County, Monterey County, Sacramento County and the surrounding area in the State of California.

Housing & Shelter
2
Bay Area Community Services Inc

BACS' mission is to uplift under-served individuals and their families by doing "whatever it takes." BACS helps people experiencing homelessness, housing insecurity, or behavioural health challenges while balancing other complications like…

—
3
Eden Council for Hope and Opportunity

Housing counseling services to low and moderate income residents of the Bay Area. Services include placement, discrimination investigations, tenant and landlord dispute resolution, reverse mortgage counseling, and rental assistance…

Housing & Shelter
4
City of Refuge Sacramento

City of Refuge Sacramento, a community-based organization, exists to support people living in marginalized communities of Sacramento and to empower their ability to create a personal transformation that will lead to a healthy and thriving…

Human Services
5
Interim Inc

Interim, inc.'s mission is to provide services and affordable housing to supporting members of our community with mental illness in building productive and satisfying lives.

—
6
Oxnard Homeless Prevntion
Human Services
7
Union Station Homeless Services

We work to end homelessness through housing solutions, supportive services, and connection to community. we advocate for equitable and just systems that ensure all individuals and families will have a safe place they can call home.

Human Services
8
West Contra Costa County Meals On Wheels

Enable frail seniors to maintain their independence at home by providing them with high quality, nutritious meals that are cost effective, prepared in West Contra Costa County, delivered by caring drivers and administered by local…

Food & Nutrition
9
Solano Affordable Housing Foundation
Housing & Shelter
10
Alpha Project for the Homeless

Alpha Project for the Homeless (Alpha Project) was organized in February 1987 under the Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law for public and charitable purposes. The mission of Alpha Project is to empower individuals, families, and…

—
11
Mission Action Inc

Mission action nurtures individual wellness and cultivates collective power among low-income and immigrant communities to create a more just society.

Housing & Shelter
12
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Santa Rosa

Catholic charities creates access to opportunities for self-sufficiency by providing innovative and compassionate services to people of all backgrounds, beliefs, and cultures.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shelter Inc; the most unlike its peers is Antioch Police Officers Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

69 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 69 of the 122 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
22
Early backer (in before they grew)
64/69
Grantees still filing
45/69
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEAM JESUS: $3,144,347 · OtherTEAM JESUSLa Palabra de Dios: $983,276 · OtherLa Palabra de DiosGREATER RICHMOND INTERFAITH PROGRAM GRIP: $900,950 · OtherMt Diablo School District: $762,558 · OtherLiving Hope Community Church: $704,900 · OtherJULY TOTAL: $647,279 · OtherLoaves and Fishes of Contra Costa: $632,591 · OtherMY ANGELS: $585,493 · Other+92 more: $8,614,853 · Other+92 moreTRINITY CENTER WALNUT CREEK: $133,702 · Human ServicesLOVE-A-CHILD MISSIONS: $92,564 · Human ServicesTEAM JESUS OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC: $85,963 · Human ServicesEast Bay Services to the Developmentally Disabled: $82,867 · Human ServicesWHITE PONY EXPRESS: $80,487 · Human ServicesALEGRIA COMMUNITY LIVING: $47,884 · Human ServicesMONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $34,103 · Human ServicesYouth Homes Inc: $32,294 · Human ServicesShare Community: $22,464 · Human Services+2 more: $27,860 · Human ServicesRR MINISTRIES: $486,258 · ReligionRESTORE - HOPE DIGNITY LIFE: $75,519 · HealthEDEN HOUSING RESIDENT SERVICES INC: $69,739 · HealthFuture Colours Corp: $51,863 · HealthCONTRA COSTA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER AUXILIARY: $35,507 · HealthORINDA SENIOR VILLAGE INC: $46,914 · Housing & ShelterSHELTER INC: $46,429 · Housing & ShelterContra Costa Interfaith Transitional Housing Inc: $29,138 · Housing & ShelterGOLDEN OAK MANOR INC: $63,147 · EducationMT DIABLO EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $50,682 · EducationCHRISTMAS FOR EVERYONE INC: $29,584 · Philanthropy
Other$16,976,247Human Services$640,188Religion$486,258Health$232,628Housing & Shelter$122,481Education$113,829Philanthropy$29,584

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER RICHMOND INTERFAITH PROGRAM GRIP: $900,950 over 8y, 15% of budgetLoaves and Fishes of Contra Costa: $632,591 over 8y, 16% of budgetRICHMOND EMERGENCY FOOD PANTRY: $148,104 over 7y, 25% of budgetTRINITY CENTER WALNUT CREEK: $133,702 over 8y, 5.6% of budgetLAFAYETTE SENIOR HOUSING ASSOCIATION INC: $93,581 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetLOVE-A-CHILD MISSIONS: $92,564 over 8y, 16% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF OAKLAND: $85,381 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetEast Bay Services to the Developmentally Disabled: $82,867 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetWHITE PONY EXPRESS: $80,487 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetEDEN HOUSING RESIDENT SERVICES INC: $69,739 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetGOLDEN OAK MANOR INC: $63,147 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetFuture Colours Corp: $51,863 over 8y, 9.9% of budgetALEGRIA COMMUNITY LIVING: $47,884 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetORINDA SENIOR VILLAGE INC: $46,914 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetSHELTER INC: $46,429 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $34,103 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetYouth Homes Inc: $32,294 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCHRISTMAS FOR EVERYONE INC: $29,584 over 2y, 29% of budgetContra Costa Interfaith Transitional Housing Inc: $29,138 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetFRANCIS ON THE HILL IN WASHINGTON DC ONL: $26,336 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetShare Community: $22,464 over 1y, 20% of budgetThe Respite Inn: $16,383 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetHUMANITY WAY INC: $10,202 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetMONUMENT IMPACT: $8,229 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetHOMELESS ACTION COALITION: $6,151 over 1y, 11% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER RICHMOND INTERFAITH PROGRAM GRIP ↗
  • Who funds Loaves and Fishes of Contra Costa ↗
  • Who funds RR MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds RICHMOND EMERGENCY FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY CENTER WALNUT CREEK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Food Bank of Contra Costa and SolanoCA60.5× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Food Bank of Contra Costa and Solano · East Bay Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Contra Costa Regional Health Foundation · Dean and Margaret Lesher Foundation · Lowell Berry Foundation · John Muir Health · Richmond Community Foundation · United Way of the Bay Area · Sutter Bay Hospitals · The San Francisco Foundation · Justice Justice Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization White Pony Express funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from White Pony Express. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to White Pony Express?

    Find your warmest path to White Pony Express through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 122 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $9.1M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on White Pony Express’ filings →

    More from the funding graph