· Public charity
Wheaton Franciscan Services Inc
To carry out the mission and philosophy of human and community development of the wheaton franciscan sisters.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 1 grants below total $88,656 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $24,696,483 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $24,607,827 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WHEATON FRANCISCAN SISTERS CORP | $88,656 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2023, 17 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $89k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEE INC4× · 2019–2022 · $559k · revenue +5%
Core El Centro Incorporated2× · 2019–2022 · $395k · revenue +31% · 27% of their budget- CCCatholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Dubuque2× · 2019–2022 · $380k · revenue +119%
Funded once
- CCCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $276k · revenue +598% · 47% of their budget
- DUDOMINICAN UNIVERSITYone grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue +22%
- WIWISDOM INCone grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue +19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…
House of Good Shepherd serves with love and compassion women and children affected by domestic violence by offering a safe place with opportunities for emotional, educational and spiritual growth, giving hope and continued support for a…
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…
To provide residential and rehabilitation services to clients with mental illnesses
Operate homes for the aged and to conduct charitable and benevolent enterprises
Provide adoption, counseling services, and refugee assistance
Christian care communities enhances the journey of life for those we serve. recognizing the unique needs of each individual christian care offers an array of housing and care options including independent living. 24-hour skilled nursing…
The Chicago Refugee Coalition is a 501c3 non-profit organization dedicated ot the alleviation of human suffering through innovative partnerships, advocacy and community empowerment.
For seniors who are unable to live alone, Catholic Charities provided fully licensed nursing home with a round-the-clock nursing staff. The Home offered physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, social services, pastoral…
Tolton Senior Housing Corporation provides housing and services for the elderly, to meet their physical, social, and psycho-social needs.
Our mission is to serve christ by accompanying individuals, families, and communities with compassion, support, and resources as they move from hardship to stability with dignity.
Ailbe Senior Housing Corporation provides housing and services for the elderly, to meet their physical, social, and psycho-social needs.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Joliet and the most unlike its peers is Core El Centro Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEE INC ↗
- Who funds Core El Centro Incorporated ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Dubuque ↗
- Who funds Bethany House of Hospitality ↗
- Who funds THRIVE COUNSELING CENTER ↗
- Who funds DUPAGE PADS INC ↗
- Who funds Maryville Academy ↗
- Who funds Illinois Community for Displaced Immigrants ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF JOLIET ↗
- Who funds DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds WISDOM INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER FAMILY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds GLENWOOD ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds BARTLETT LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTH CARE NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds TEEN PARENT CONNECTION INC ↗
- Who funds SOJOURNER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BEDS PLUS INC ↗
- Who funds CONSERVANCY FOR HEALING & ↗
- Who funds Bethlehem Farm Inc ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR SPIRITUAL & PUBLIC LDRSHP ↗
- Who funds WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS ↗
- Who funds EXODUS WORLD SERVICE ↗
- Who funds THE CHRISTINE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DUPAGE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds ARISE CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC D/B/A HESED HOUSE ↗
- Who funds ST PATRICK'S RESIDENCE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Dupage Community Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Baird Foundation Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · The Bersted Foundation · Archdiocese of Milwaukee Catholic Community Foundation Inc · Helen V Brach Foundation · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · United Way of Bergen County
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wheaton Franciscan Services Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals — 67% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.