Skip to content
Weyand 62 Char Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Weyand 62 Char Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$95kEducation$77kHealth$75kArts & Culture$65kAnimals$59kRecreation & Sports$46kFood & Nutrition$42kHuman Services$38kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DIGDEEP$10,000
TRU COMMUNITY CARE$3,000
ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH$2,000
MAKEAWISH FOUNDATION OF COLORADO$2,000
WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY$1,500
CO CATTLEMENS AGRICULTURAL LAND TR$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2k → 14%TRU COMMUNITY CARE: $7k → 12%RESPITE CARE INC: $10k → 11%TRU COMMUNITY CARE: $6k → 12%TRU COMMUNITY CARE: $5k → 12%TRU COMMUNITY CARE: $3k → 12%TRU COMMUNITY CARE: $3k → 12%TRU COMMUNITY CARE: $2k → 12%TRU COMMUNITY CARE: $2k → 12%TRU COMMUNITY CARE: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MT
WI
MI
MA
IN
CA
CO
KY
VA
AZ
NM
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$313k · 22 repeat orgs$271k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
41

Total granted

$313k
$261k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+38%

Still filing today

77%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RR
    ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH
    8× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +73%
  • TC
    TRU COMMUNITY CARE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $29k · revenue +332%
  • DB
    DENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $25k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • LA
    LIBRARY ASSOCIATION OF LA JOLLAgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $59k · revenue +28%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $34k
  • YT
    YELLOWSTONE TO YUKON CONSERVATION
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rocky Mountain Wild

Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…

Environment
2
The Montana Land Reliance

The mission of the montana land reliance (mlr) is to partner with landowners to provide permanent protection for private lands that are significant for agricultural production, fish and wildlife habitat, and open space.

Environment
3
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
4
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
5
Cuenca Los Ojos

Cuenca los ojos works to preserve and restore the biodiversity of the us/mexican borderlands through land protection, habitat restoration and wildlife reintroduction.

Environment
6
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
7
Mountain Area Land Trust

Mountain area land trust's mission is to save natural areas, wildlife habitat, streams and rivers, working ranches and historic lands, for the benefit of the community and as a legacy for future generations.

Environment
8
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
9
Rio Grande Headwaters Land Trust

To conserve our land, water, and way of life in colorados san luis valley.

Environment
10
Greater Yellowstone Coalition

Greater yellowstone coalition works with all people to protect the lands, waters, and wildlife of the greater yellowstone ecosystem, now and for future generations.

Environment
11
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
12
Conservation Legacy

Conservation legacy engages future leaders who protect, restore, and enhance our nation's lands through community-based service.in 2024, conservation legacy engaged 2,524 participants who completed over 1.5 million service hours on public…

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wildearth Guardians; the most unlike its peers is Responsibility. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/43
Grantees still filing
35/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $33,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYELLOWSTONE TO YUKON CONSERVATION: $20,000 · OtherYELLOWSTONE TO YUKON CONSERVATIONYAMPA VALLEY LAND TRUST INC: $14,000 · OtherLAND TRUST: $13,000 · OtherWILDEARTH GUARDIANS: $10,000 · OtherATHENAEUM: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $10,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $10,000 · OtherDIG DEEP: $10,000 · OtherDENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC: $25,000 · OtherDENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INCTHE LORD'S PLACE INC: $20,000 · OtherTHE LORD'S PLACE INCJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $10,000 · Other+28 more: $104,478 · Other+28 moreLIBRARY ASSOCIATION OF LA JOLLA: $59,414 · EducationLIBRARY ASS…Culver Educational Foundation: $2,500 · EducationLA JOLLA MUSIC SOCIETY: $39,810 · Arts & CultureLA JOLLA …MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureMALTZ JUP…OLD GLOBE THEATRE: $5,000 · Arts & CultureOLD GLOBE…+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $17,000 · AnimalsTHE WILD …LIVING WITH WOLVES LTD: $13,000 · AnimalsLIVING WI…SKY DOG SANCTUARY INC: $5,000 · AnimalsSKY DOG S…THE MAXFUND INC: $4,000 · AnimalsTHE MAXFU…THE MILO FOUNDATION: $2,696 · AnimalsTHE MILO …GRAYSON-JOCKEY CLUB RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · AnimalsTHE GREAT ESCAPE INC: $2,000 · Animals+1 more: $1,000 · AnimalsNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $17,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $14,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $10,000 · HealthSHADES OF PINK FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthTRU COMMUNITY CARE: $28,500 · Human ServicesRESPITE CARE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $3,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,696 · Human ServicesROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $39,500 · Recreation & SportsHALLECK CREEK RANCH: $3,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$299,978Education$61,914Arts & Culture$50,810Animals$47,196Health$46,000Human Services$43,196Recreation & Sports$42,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIBRARY ASSOCIATION OF LA JOLLA: $59,414 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetLA JOLLA MUSIC SOCIETY: $39,810 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $39,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTRU COMMUNITY CARE: $28,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LORD'S PLACE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $17,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $17,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $14,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYAMPA VALLEY LAND TRUST INC: $14,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetLIVING WITH WOLVES LTD: $13,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetWILDEARTH GUARDIANS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRESPITE CARE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER URBAN GARDENS: $7,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetYAMPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $7,158 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRESPONSIBILITY: $7,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSHADES OF PINK FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF METRO DENVER: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSKY DOG SANCTUARY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOLD GLOBE THEATRE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETRO CARING: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Food Bank for Larimer County: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MAXFUND INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHALLECK CREEK RANCH: $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MILO FOUNDATION: $2,696 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGRAYSON-JOCKEY CLUB RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCulver Educational Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGENEVA GLEN CAMP INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GREAT ESCAPE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,696 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMancos Valley Resources: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWILDCARE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLa Jolla Historical Society: $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Louis F and Florence …Colorado Gives Founda…Greater HorizonsThe Arthur & Barbara …The Conrad Prebys Fou…Jewish Community Foun…The San Diego Foundat…The Blackbaud Giving …Shell USA Company Fou…The Pfizer Foundation…American Endowment Fo…National Philanthropi…
Louis F and Florence H Weyand 1977WI34.8× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Louis F and Florence H Weyand 1977 · Colorado Gives Foundation · Greater Horizons · The Arthur & Barbara Bloom Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The San Diego Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Weyand 62 Char Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Weyand 62 Char Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • The Lord's Place Inc: 12% of income from government
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • South Florida Pbs Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Weyand 62 Char Trust?

Find your warmest path to Weyand 62 Char Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Weyand 62 Char’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home