Skip to content
West Virginia Primary Care Association Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

West Virginia Primary Care Association Inc

To assure accessible, high-quality and cost-effective health services for all west virginians, regardless of economic or social status, through the cultivation of financial, political and philanthropic relationships.

$296k
Granted FY2022
25
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2022 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 25 grants below total $255,720, the rows itemized in this filing. The $296,421 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $40,701 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k16 grants · $126k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $130k
$9,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC$17,720
LINCOLN COUNTY PRIMARY CARE CENTER INC DBA SOUTHERN WV HEALTH SYSTEM$14,000
COMMUNITY CARE OF WV$14,000
WOMENCARE INC DBA FAMILY CARE$14,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC DBA ACCESS HEALTH$14,000
CHANGE INC$14,000
NEW RIVER HEALTH ASSOCIATION INC$14,000
SHENANDOAH COMMUNITY HEALTH$14,000
CABIN CREEK HEALTH SYSTEMS INC$14,000
MINNIE HAMILTON HEALTH SYSTEM$9,000
MONONGAHELA VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF HEALTH CENTERS INC$9,000
VALLEY HEALTH CARE INC$9,000
WIRT COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES ASSOCIATION INC DBA COPLIN$9,000
RITCHIE REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER$9,000
EA HAWSE HEALTH CENTER$9,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 59% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 18%WOMENCARE INC DBA FAMILY CARE: $14k → 10%SHENANDOAH COMMUNITY HEALTH: $14k → 11%CHANGE INC: $14k → 12%EA HAWSE HEALTH CENTER: $9k → 13%MONROE HEALTH CENTER: $8k → 15%PENDLETON COMMUNITY CARE: $6k → 15%MONONGAHELA VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF HEALTH CENTERS INC: $9k → 15%PRESTON-TAYLOR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $8k → 16%VALLEY HEALTH CARE INC: $9k → 17%CABIN CREEK HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $14k → 18%COMMUNITY CARE OF WV: $14k → 19%WIRT COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES ASSOCIATION INC DBA COPLIN: $9k → 19%ROANE COUNTY FAMILY HEALTH CARE INC: $6k → 19%VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $18k → 19%COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC DBA ACCESS HEALTH: $14k → 20%RITCHIE REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER: $9k → 20%BELINGTON MEDICAL CLINIC DBA BARBOUR COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSOCIATION: $8k → 20%RAINELLE MEDICAL CENTER INC: $9k → 20%BLUESTONE HEALTH ASSOCIATION INC: $9k → 21%MINNIE HAMILTON HEALTH SYSTEM: $9k → 22%CAMDEN ON GAULEY MEDICAL CENTER INC: $8k → 24%LINCOLN COUNTY PRIMARY CARE CENTER INC DBA SOUTHERN WV HEALTH SYSTEM: $14k → 24%WILLIAMSON HEALTH & WELLNESS CENTER: $6k → 31%TUG RIVER HEALTH ASSOCIATION INC: $6k → 38%NEW RIVER HEALTH ASSOCIATION INC: $14k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mountaineer Community Health Center

To provide primary medical care service in a rural community.

Health
2
Mountain Valleys Health Centers

We serve our rural communities with complete quality care and friendly customer service, providing exceptional healthcare for all.

—
3
Southwest Virginia Community Health Systems Inc

Provide comprehensive primary medical care to the communites served.

Health
4
Horizon Health Care Inc

Horizon health care, inc. provides rural communities with access to high-quality, affordable primary healthcare services.

Health
5
Valley Health Systems Inc

To provide quality healthcare to all individuals, emphasizing outreach to those who are underserved. valley health strives to ensure that quality healthcare is readily accessible to everyone and serves patients regardless of their ability…

Health
6
Muskingum Valley Health Center

To provide affordable, accessible, and quality healthcare.

Health
7
Valley Comprehensive Community Health Center Inc

Valley healthcare system shall improve our community's health by delivering the highest quality behavioral healthcare guided by our consumer's needs.

—
8
Blue Ridge Health Center Inc

Community health center

—
9
Belmont Professional Associates Inc

To improve the communitys health through the efficient provision, coordination, and integration of quality health services, health education, and research. To provide compassionate, quality health services according to the spiritual,…

—
10
Wayne County Healthy Communities

Providing access to quality primary health care for all.

Health
11
Carolina Family Health Centers Inc

Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST

—
12
Beckley Health Right Inc

To provide primary care services at no cost to uninsured and underinsured low income residents of west virginia.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Care of West Virginia Inc; the most unlike its peers is Women's Care Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
21/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEM: $17,720 · HealthVALLEY HEALTH SYSTEMWOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC: $14,000 · HealthWOMEN'S CARE CENTER INCSHENANDOAH VALLEY MEDICAL SYSTEM I: $14,000 · HealthSHENANDOAH VALLEY MEDICAL SYSTEM INew River Health Association Inc: $14,000 · HealthNew River Health Association IncLINCOLN COUNTY PRIMARY CARE CENTER INC: $14,000 · HealthLINCOLN COUNTY PRIMARY CARE CENTER INCRAINELLE MEDICAL CENTER INC: $9,000 · HealthWIRT COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES ASSOCIATION INC: $9,000 · HealthMINNIE HAMILTON HEALTH CARE CENTER INC: $9,000 · HealthRITCHIE COUNTY PRIMARY CARE ASSOC INC: $9,000 · HealthBLUESTONE HEALTH ASSOCIATION INC: $9,000 · HealthE A HAWSE HEALTH CENTER: $9,000 · HealthCAMDEN ON GAULEY MEDICAL CENTER INC: $8,000 · HealthBELINGTON COMMUNITY MEDICAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION INC: $8,000 · HealthPRESTON TAYLOR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER CENTERS INC: $8,000 · Health+4 more: $22,000 · Health+4 moreCommunity Care of West Virginia Inc: $14,000 · OtherCommunity Care of West …COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $14,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEM…MONONGAHELA VALLEY ASSOC OF HEALTH CENTERS: $9,000 · OtherMONONGAHELA VALLEY ASSO…VALLEY HEALTH CARE INC: $9,000 · OtherVALLEY HEALTH CARE INCMONROE HEALTH CENTER: $8,000 · OtherMONROE HEALTH CENTERCABIN CREEK HEALTH CENTER INC: $14,000 · ReligionCHANGE INC: $14,000 · Employment
Health$173,720Other$54,000Religion$14,000Employment$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVALLEY HEALTH SYSTEM: $17,720 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Care of West Virginia Inc: $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCABIN CREEK HEALTH CENTER INC: $14,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC: $14,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHENANDOAH VALLEY MEDICAL SYSTEM I: $14,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHANGE INC: $14,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNew River Health Association Inc: $14,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLINCOLN COUNTY PRIMARY CARE CENTER INC: $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAINELLE MEDICAL CENTER INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONONGAHELA VALLEY ASSOC OF HEALTH CENTERS: $9,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVALLEY HEALTH CARE INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWIRT COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES ASSOCIATION INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMINNIE HAMILTON HEALTH CARE CENTER INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRITCHIE COUNTY PRIMARY CARE ASSOC INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLUESTONE HEALTH ASSOCIATION INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetE A HAWSE HEALTH CENTER: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMDEN ON GAULEY MEDICAL CENTER INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBELINGTON COMMUNITY MEDICAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRESTON TAYLOR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER CENTERS INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTUG RIVER HEALTH ASSOCIATION INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPENDLETON COMMUNITY CARE INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWILLIAMSON HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROANE COUNTY FAMILY HEALTH CARE INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

West Virginia Univers…Delta Dental Communit…American Cancer Socie…Direct ReliefParkersburg Area Comm…Claude Worthington Be…Highmark FoundationWest Virginia Allianc…Sisters of St Joseph …The Greater Kanawha V…Amazonsmile Foundation
West Virginia University Research CorporationWV36.6× affinity15 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: West Virginia University Research Corporation · Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · American Cancer Society Inc · Direct Relief · Parkersburg Area Community Foundation Inc (Previously Pacf Inc) · Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation · Highmark Foundation · West Virginia Alliance for Creative Health Solutions Inc · Sisters of St Joseph Charitable Fund Inc · The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization West Virginia Primary Care Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from West Virginia Primary Care Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on West Virginia Primary Care Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home