· Public charity
Wescom Foundation
To help improve the lives and living conditions of all californians by supporting nonprofit community organizations through strategic grantmaking and community engagement.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 39 grants below total $1,059,481 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,197,579 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $138,098 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k33 grants · $583k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $471k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK | $169,130 |
| UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES | $100,000 |
| THOMAS HOUSE TEMPORARY SHELTER | $79,745 |
| THE UCLA FOUNDATION | $63,250 |
| REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA | $58,605 |
| SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC | $43,196 |
| LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK | $35,196 |
| MEND - MEET EACH NEED WITH DIGNITY | $33,245 |
| FEEDING AMERICA RIVERSIDE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES | $33,196 |
| FOOD SHARE OF VENTURA COUNTY | $33,196 |
| A PLACE CALLED HOME | $29,745 |
| HOUSE OF RUTH INC | $29,745 |
| CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION | $27,209 |
| INLAND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA UNITED WAY | $22,209 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $22,209 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $605k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 35% of Wescom Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 65% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 57% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
31 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $234k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CMCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK7× · 2017–2024 · $704k · revenue +31%
- USUNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES5× · 2020–2024 · $192k · revenue +94%
- SHSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC5× · 2020–2024 · $146k · revenue +3%
Funded once
- LCLegacy Connectionsgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $126k · revenue +50%
MAUI FOOD BANK INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $77k · revenue +138%- NCNATIONAL CREDIT UNION FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $77k · revenue -11%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.
Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…
To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…
Community organizing, education, advocacy, leadership development, direct services and organizational development for communities faced with immense poverty.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
Hollywood food coalition welcomes people to dinner each night. we rescue and redistribute food daily to other organizations. we care for our immediate community through our wellness program. we build community with and through our…
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
California association of food banks (cafb) is a non-profit public benefit corporation located in oakland, california. together with its 41-member foodbanks, cafb is the largest charitable hunger-relief and anti-hunger leader in the state.…
On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…
Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…
Union rescue mission embraces people with the compassion of christ. we assist people experiencing homelessness by providing a comprehensive array of emergency and long-term services to our guests, including: food, shelter, clothing,…
Hunger action los angeles ends hunger and promotes healthy eating through advocacy, education, and appropriate direct service. the chief program area currently is the market match prgram operated by hala at 22 farmers markets in la county…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Partners and the most unlike its peers is Wetlands and Wildlife Care Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds THOMAS HOUSE TEMPORARY SHELTER ↗
- Who funds FEEDING AMERICA RIVERSIDE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds Legacy Connections ↗
- Who funds FOOD SHARE INC ↗
- Who funds MEND - Meet Each Need With Dignity ↗
- Who funds A PLACE CALLED HOME ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds United States Association for UNHCR ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF RUTH INC ↗
- Who funds MAUI FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CREDIT UNION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds THE ARC LOS ANGELES & ORANGE COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds WORLDWIDE FOUNDATION FOR CREDIT UNIONS INC ↗
- Who funds SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds THE UNFORGETTABLES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHOC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Todec Legal Center Perris ↗
- Who funds BLACK WOMEN FOR WELLNESS ↗
- Who funds Central Coast Alliance United for a Sustainable Economy ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FLYING CROWN LAND GROUP ↗
- Who funds INLAND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds ANGEL CITY PIT BULLS ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF RUTH ↗
- Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds Youth Action Project Inc ↗
- Who funds EQUALITY CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Liberty Hill Foundation · The California Endowment · Orange County Community Foundation · Inland Empire Community Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Mufg Union Bank Foundation Ag · Sempra Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wescom Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.