Skip to content

· Private foundation

Weissler Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2026still arriving
10
Grants FY2026still arriving
3
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$56kHealth$23kEducation$12kRecreation & Sports$11kHuman Services$11kCommunity Improvement$10kArts & Culture$5kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2026 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$321k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OUR LADY OF GRACE CATHOLIC CHURCH$3,500
EQUESTRIAN ORDER OF THE HOLY SEPULC$2,250
CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$2,224
COMPASSIONATE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC$2,000
OUR LADY OF THE MOUNTAINS$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
ST LUKES CATHOLIC CHURCH$1,050
THE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL OF CASTLE HILL$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
ST THERESA CATHOLIC CHURCH$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MEND: $500 → 14%COVENANT HOUSE: $100 → 16%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $250 → 10%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $200 → 10%VIOLA'S HUGE HEART FOUNDATION: $500 → 16%BOYSVILLE: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
WY
IA
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
NM
TN
DC
MS
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$138k · 32 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2026, 25 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
64

Total granted

$138k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+12%

Still filing today

31%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyReligionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CHRISTIAN SCHOOL AT CASTLE HILLS
    6× · 2018–2026 · $6k · revenue +120%
  • TO
    TRIUMPH OVER KID CANCER FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2023 · $2k · revenue +198%
  • OS
    OBLATE SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY
    2× · 2020–2022 · $1k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • KC
    KARNES CITY COLUMBUS CLUB
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • OT
    ON THE WAY ANDALE
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • TP
    THE POLISH HERITAGE CTR
    one grant, 2025 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
2
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
5
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
6
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
7
Texas Children's Hospital

Texas children's hospital, headquartered in houston, texas, is a not-for-profit organization whose mission is to create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and…

Health
8
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
9
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
10
Mhs Physicians of Texas

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
11
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
12
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Road Ministries; the most unlike its peers is Ian S Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 100 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
16/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OUR LADY OF GRACE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $32,940 · OtherOUR LADY OF GRACE CATHOLIC CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $20,900 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEQUESTRIAN ORDER OF THE HOLY SEPULC: $13,410 · OtherEQUESTRIAN ORDER OF THE HOLY SEPULCKARNES CITY COLUMBUS CLUB: $10,000 · OtherKARNES CITY COLUMBUS CLUBCENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $6,907 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,500 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF SAN ANTONIO: $6,475 · OtherOUR LADY OF THE MOUNTAINS: $5,400 · Other+72 more: $46,387 · Other+72 moreTHRIVEWELL CANCER FOUNDATION: $6,500 · HealthCOMPASSIONATE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC: $2,000 · HealthTRIUMPH OVER KID CANCER FOUNDATION: $1,500 · HealthAUGUSTHEART: $500 · HealthThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $406 · Health+2 more: $200 · HealthCHRISTIAN SCHOOL AT CASTLE HILLS: $6,000 · EducationOBLATE SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY: $1,000 · EducationTEXAS AGGIE CORPS OF CADETS ASSOCIATION: $250 · Education+1 more: $100 · EducationMISSION ROAD MINISTRIES: $6,500 · ReligionBOYSVILLE INC: $500 · Human ServicesMEND - Meet Each Need With Dignity: $500 · Human ServicesVIOLA'S HUGE HEART FOUNDATION: $500 · Human ServicesNONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $450 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE TEXAS: $100 · Human ServicesGOFUNDMEORG: $725 · Philanthropy+1 more: $5 · PhilanthropyDEVILS RIVER CONSERVANCY: $275 · Environment
Other$148,919Health$11,106Education$7,350Religion$6,500Human Services$2,050Philanthropy$730Environment$275

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHRIVEWELL CANCER FOUNDATION: $6,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMISSION ROAD MINISTRIES: $6,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN SCHOOL AT CASTLE HILLS: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTRIUMPH OVER KID CANCER FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALPHA HOME INC: $1,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOBLATE SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $725 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYSVILLE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEND - Meet Each Need With Dignity: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIOLA'S HUGE HEART FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetAUGUSTHEART: $500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $406 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDEVILS RIVER CONSERVANCY: $275 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS AGGIE CORPS OF CADETS ASSOCIATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE TEXAS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASSOCIATION OF FORMER STUDENTS OF TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $75 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO CHRISTIAN DENTAL CLINIC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt Mary's University: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetI LIVE HERE I GIVE HERE: $5 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THRIVEWELL CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MISSION ROAD MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN SCHOOL AT CASTLE HILLS ↗
  • Who funds COMPASSIONATE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds TRIUMPH OVER KID CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALPHA HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds OBLATE SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG ↗
  • Who funds BOYSVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEND - Meet Each Need With Dignity ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area FoundationTX27.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Ed Rachal Foundation · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · Mays Family Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · The Klesse Foundation · Betty Stieren Kelso Foundation · Scanlan Foundation · United Way of San Antonio and Bexar County · Nustar Foundation · Alice Kleberg Reynolds Meyer Foundat A0479800

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Weissler Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Weissler Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 100 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Weissler Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph