· Private foundation
Weinert Family Foundation Inc Fka J & K Weinert Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $1k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $57k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $426k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TWIN CITIES | $191,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION | $175,000 |
| CLEAN WATER FUND | $60,000 |
| SPIDER CHAIN OF LAKES ASSOCIATION | $32,050 |
| CHRIS ELLIOTT FUND DBA ENDBRAINCANCER INITIATIVE | $25,000 |
| LANDMARK CONSERVANCY INC | $1,000 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY | $200 |
| MAYO CLINIC | $200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TWIN CITIES7× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +42%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION5× · 2017–2024 · $693k · revenue +39%
- SCSPIDER CHAIN OF LAKES ASSOCIATION7× · 2017–2024 · $443k · revenue +79% · 50% of their budget
Funded once
- HDHAMMOCK DUNES CARES INC F/K/A HAMMOCK DUNES CARES LLCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +49%
- SDST DAVID'S CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $500 · revenue +37%
- AHAmerican Heart Association Incgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $280 · revenue +26%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…
Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.
See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.
Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.
Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.
City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Cancer Society Inc and the most unlike its peers is Camp of Dreams. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TWIN CITIES ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SPIDER CHAIN OF LAKES ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CLEAN WATER FUND ↗
- Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds CAMP OF DREAMS ↗
- Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS MN MINNESOTANORTH DAKOTASOUTH DAKOTA ↗
- Who funds HAMMOCK DUNES CARES INC F/K/A HAMMOCK DUNES CARES LLC ↗
- Who funds LANDMARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds ST DAVID'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds SAIL NEWPORT ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds FLAGLER HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE ACADEMY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Weinert Family Foundation Inc Fka J & K Weinert Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.