Skip to content
Weinert Family Foundation Inc Fka J & K Weinert Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Weinert Family Foundation Inc Fka J & K Weinert Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$484k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$191k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$1.2MEducation$728kEnvironment$728kHealth$197kHuman Services$1kRecreation & Sports$300Philanthropy$100Other$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $1k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $57k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $426k
$32,050
Median grant
5
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TWIN CITIES$191,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$175,000
CLEAN WATER FUND$60,000
SPIDER CHAIN OF LAKES ASSOCIATION$32,050
CHRIS ELLIOTT FUND DBA ENDBRAINCANCER INITIATIVE$25,000
LANDMARK CONSERVANCY INC$1,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$200
MAYO CLINIC$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HAMMOCK DUNES CARE INC: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MA
RI
CA
VA
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 9 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
11

Total granted

$2.8M
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+37%

Still filing today

67%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentEducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TWIN CITIES
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +42%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2024 · $693k · revenue +39%
  • SC
    SPIDER CHAIN OF LAKES ASSOCIATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $443k · revenue +79% · 50% of their budget

Funded once

  • HD
    HAMMOCK DUNES CARES INC F/K/A HAMMOCK DUNES CARES LLCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +49%
  • SD
    ST DAVID'S CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $500 · revenue +37%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $280 · revenue +26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
2
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
3
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
4
Association of American Medical Colleges

Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.

Education
5
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
6
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
7
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
8
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
9
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

—
10
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
11
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
12
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Cancer Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is Camp of Dreams. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TWIN CITIES: $1,206,884 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TWIN CITIES+1 more: $500 · Youth DevelopmentUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $693,357 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUN…Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $35,000 · Education+1 more: $51 · EducationSPIDER CHAIN OF LAKES ASSOCIATION: $442,525 · EnvironmentSPIDER CHAIN OF LAKES ASSO…CLEAN WATER FUND: $235,000 · EnvironmentCLEAN WATER FUND+1 more: $1,250 · EnvironmentTHE END BRAIN CANCER INITIATIVE: $167,125 · OtherTHE END B…THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $25,000 · OtherTHE NATUR…CHRIS ELLIOTT FUND DBA ENDBRAINCANCER INITIATIVE: $25,000 · OtherCHRIS ELL…CLEAN WATER FOUNDATION: $24,000 · OtherCLEAN WAT…+4 more: $3,335 · OtherCAMP OF DREAMS: $11,000 · Health+6 more: $1,105 · HealthHAMMOCK DUNES CARES INC F/K/A HAMMOCK DUNES CARES LLC: $1,250 · Human ServicesSAIL NEWPORT: $200 · Recreation & SportsAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $100 · Philanthropy
Youth Development$1,207,384Education$728,408Environment$678,775Other$244,460Health$12,105Human Services$1,250Recreation & Sports$200Philanthropy$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TWIN CITIES: $1,206,884 over 7y, 4.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $693,357 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSPIDER CHAIN OF LAKES ASSOCIATION: $442,525 over 7y, 50% of budgetCLEAN WATER FUND: $235,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP OF DREAMS: $11,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS MN MINNESOTANORTH DAKOTASOUTH DAKOTA: $3,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLANDMARK CONSERVANCY INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHAMMOCK DUNES CARES INC F/K/A HAMMOCK DUNES CARES LLC: $1,250 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetST DAVID'S CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $280 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $220 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAIL NEWPORT: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $105 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLAGLER HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE ACADEMY INC: $51 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
American Endowment FoundationOH10.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Weinert Family Foundation Inc Fka J & K Weinert Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Weinert Family Foundation Inc Fka J & K Weinert Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Weinert Family Foundation Inc Fka J & K Weinert Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home