Skip to content

· Charitable trust

Weaver-Parrish Charitable Trust

Provide assistance to other tax-exempt organizations that benefit needy and underprivileged individuals.

$240k
Granted FY2022
18
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2022.

Health$249kFood & Nutrition$129kHuman Services$84kEmployment$82kReligion$43kHousing & Shelter$42kYouth Development$31kCrime & Legal$26kOther$0
02FY2022 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k6 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $202k
$13,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Dallas Cnty Dept Human Resourc$29,000
Selma Area Food Bank$24,000
Cahaba Regional Mental Health$21,000
Vaughan Community Health$20,000
Christian Outreach Alliance$19,000
Special Years Plus$15,000
Blackbelt & Central AL Housing$15,000
Selma AIR Inc$13,500
BSA Crane District$13,000
Fathers of St Edmund$11,000
Dallas County Resource Center$11,000
Central Ala Reg Child Advocacy Ctr$10,000
UAB Mobile Clinic$9,000
Sabra Sanctuary Inc$8,000
Easter Seals West Central Ala$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $62k) land where the poverty rate runs at 33%, against an area that typically sits at 19%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 19%Dallas County Resource Center: $11k → 33%Dallas County Resource Center: $10k → 33%Sabra Sanctuary Inc: $10k → 33%YMCA Selma Dallas County: $10k → 33%Sabra Sanctuary Inc: $8k → 33%Sabra Sanctuary Inc: $8k → 33%Dallas County Resource Center: $5k → 33%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$677k · 17 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against -35% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2022, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
2

Total granted

$677k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
-35%

Still filing today

47%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’22
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterHealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    United Community Services of Selma and Dallas County Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $89k · revenue +78%
  • SA
    SELMA AREA FOOD BANK
    8× · 2017–2024 · $74k · revenue +94%
  • BC
    BLACKBELT & CENTRAL ALABAMA HOUSING AUTHORITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $42k · revenue +144%

Funded once

  • TY
    THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SELMA ALABAMA
    2× · 2018–2019 · $10k · revenue -35%
  • BP
    BLOOM PROJECT INC
    3× · 2018–2021 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dale County Rescue Mission

The rescue missions purpose is to provide food, housing , and transportation in emergency situations to local residents and transients, Those served are spiritually ministered.

Human Services
2
Selma Dallas County Sav-a-Life Inc

Assist women in unplanned pregnancies

Civil Rights
3
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Milam County
—
4
Caring for Citizens of Alabama

Social services

Human Services
5
Southeastern Oklahoma Family Services Inc

Provide mental health counseling to needy families and persons in south central Oklahoma

Recreation & Sports
6
Family Services of North Alabama

Strengthens families and serve sexual assault victims

Human Services
7
Tillman County Food Bank Foundation
—
8
Talladega County Child Advocacy Center Inc

Interview facility for child abuse victims.

Human Services
9
Shelby Emergency Assistance Inc

Provide emergency assistance to individuals and families in Shelby County, Alabama. This includes food, medical and dental services, utilities, housing, case management, advocacy, information and referral, etc.

—
10
Texas Foster Care & Adoption Serv

A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.

Human Services
11
Casa of Tipton County

Child Advocacy Services

Crime & Legal
12
Shelter Agencies for Families in East Texas

To provide shelter to abused families.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Young Men's Christian Association of Selma Alabama; the most unlike its peers is Central Alabama Regional Child Advocacy Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

United Community Services of Selma and Dallas County Inc: $89,000 · OtherUnited Community Services of Selma and Dallas County IncWalker County Department of Human Resources: $82,000 · OtherWalker County Department of Human ResourcesCHRISTIAN OUTREACH ALLIANCE OF DALLAS COUNTY ALABAMA: $55,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN OUTREACH ALLIANCE OF DALLAS COUNTY ALABAMACAHABA CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL RETARDATION: $52,000 · OtherCAHABA CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL RETARDATIONSPECIAL YEARS PLUS INC: $41,750 · OtherSPECIAL YEARS PLUS INCFATHERS OF ST EDMUND SOUTHERN MISSIONS INC: $36,000 · OtherFATHERS OF ST EDMUND SOUTHERN MISSIONS INCTUKABATCHEE AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $31,000 · OtherTUKABATCHEE AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICAEASTER SEALS ALABAMA INC: $29,000 · OtherEASTER SEALS ALABAMA INC+5 more: $40,300 · Other+5 moreSELMA AREA FOOD BANK: $74,000 · Food & NutritionSELMA AREA F…Dallas County Family Resource Center: $26,000 · Human ServicesDallas Cou…SABRA SANCTUARY INC: $26,000 · Human ServicesSABRA SANC…THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SELMA ALABAMA: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG …BLACKBELT & CENTRAL ALABAMA HOUSING AUTHORITY: $42,000 · Housing & ShelterSELMA AIR INC: $37,500 · HealthCentral Alabama Regional Child Advocacy Center: $26,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$456,050Food & Nutrition$74,000Human Services$62,000Housing & Shelter$42,000Health$37,500Crime & Legal$26,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnited Community Services of Selma and Dallas County Inc: $89,000 over 8y, 9.7% of budgetSELMA AREA FOOD BANK: $74,000 over 8y, 7.2% of budgetBLACKBELT & CENTRAL ALABAMA HOUSING AUTHORITY: $42,000 over 8y, 12% of budgetSELMA AIR INC: $37,500 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetTUKABATCHEE AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $31,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetDallas County Family Resource Center: $26,000 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetSABRA SANCTUARY INC: $26,000 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetCentral Alabama Regional Child Advocacy Center: $26,000 over 8y, 3.9% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SELMA ALABAMA: $10,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds United Community Services of Selma and Dallas County Inc ↗
  • Who funds SELMA AREA FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds BLACKBELT & CENTRAL ALABAMA HOUSING AUTHORITY ↗
  • Who funds SELMA AIR INC ↗
  • Who funds TUKABATCHEE AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds Dallas County Family Resource Center ↗
  • Who funds SABRA SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds Central Alabama Regional Child Advocacy Center ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SELMA ALABAMA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Louis Edward Morris and Erin Vaughan Morris TrustAL20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Louis Edward Morris and Erin Vaughan Morris Trust · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · The Black Belt Community Foundation Inc · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Ala-Tom RC&D Council Inc · Mike and Gillian Goodrich Foundation · International Paper Company Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Weaver-Parrish Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Weaver-Parrish Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Weaver-Parrish Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Weaver-Parrish Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $230k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Weaver-Parrish’s filings →

    More from the funding graph