· Charitable trust
Weaver-Parrish Charitable Trust
Provide assistance to other tax-exempt organizations that benefit needy and underprivileged individuals.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k6 grants · $39k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $202k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Dallas Cnty Dept Human Resourc | $29,000 |
| Selma Area Food Bank | $24,000 |
| Cahaba Regional Mental Health | $21,000 |
| Vaughan Community Health | $20,000 |
| Christian Outreach Alliance | $19,000 |
| Special Years Plus | $15,000 |
| Blackbelt & Central AL Housing | $15,000 |
| Selma AIR Inc | $13,500 |
| BSA Crane District | $13,000 |
| Dallas County Resource Center | $11,000 |
| Fathers of St Edmund | $11,000 |
| Central Ala Reg Child Advocacy Ctr | $10,000 |
| UAB Mobile Clinic | $9,000 |
| Sabra Sanctuary Inc | $8,000 |
| Easter Seals West Central Ala | $8,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $62k) land where the poverty rate runs at 33%, against an area that typically sits at 19%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against -35% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2022, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UCUnited Community Services of Selma and Dallas County Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $89k · revenue +78%
- SASELMA AREA FOOD BANK8× · 2017–2024 · $74k · revenue +94%
- BCBLACKBELT & CENTRAL ALABAMA HOUSING AUTHORITY8× · 2017–2024 · $42k · revenue +144%
Funded once
- TYTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SELMA ALABAMA2× · 2018–2019 · $10k · revenue -35%
- BPBLOOM PROJECT INC3× · 2018–2021 · $4k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The rescue missions purpose is to provide food, housing , and transportation in emergency situations to local residents and transients, Those served are spiritually ministered.
Assist women in unplanned pregnancies
Social services
Provide mental health counseling to needy families and persons in south central Oklahoma
Strengthens families and serve sexual assault victims
Interview facility for child abuse victims.
Provide emergency assistance to individuals and families in Shelby County, Alabama. This includes food, medical and dental services, utilities, housing, case management, advocacy, information and referral, etc.
A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.
Child Advocacy Services
To provide shelter to abused families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Young Men's Christian Association of Selma Alabama and the most unlike its peers is Central Alabama Regional Child Advocacy Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds United Community Services of Selma and Dallas County Inc ↗
- Who funds SELMA AREA FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds BLACKBELT & CENTRAL ALABAMA HOUSING AUTHORITY ↗
- Who funds SELMA AIR INC ↗
- Who funds TUKABATCHEE AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds Central Alabama Regional Child Advocacy Center ↗
- Who funds Dallas County Family Resource Center ↗
- Who funds SABRA SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SELMA ALABAMA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Louis Edward Morris and Erin Vaughan Morris Trust · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · The Black Belt Community Foundation Inc · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Ala-Tom RC&D Council Inc · Mike and Gillian Goodrich Foundation · International Paper Company Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Weaver-Parrish Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Weaver-Parrish Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to Weaver-Parrish Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.