· Community foundation
The Black Belt Community Foundation Inc
To ensure all black belt residents live and work in healthy, prosperous, inclusive, educated, creative and giving communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 45 grants below total $1,543,547 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,294,033 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $750,486 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k16 grants · $102k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $292k
- $50k–250k11 grants · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FUND FOR SOUTHERN COMMUNITIES | $242,750 |
| BAMA KIDS | $150,000 |
| DIVINE GIRLS COALITION | $128,000 |
| HALE COUNTY COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT SOCIETY | $128,000 |
| GREENE COUNTY FOSTER & ADOPTIVE PARENTS ASSOCIATION | $128,000 |
| TRUTHSPEAKS INNOVATION FOUNDATION | $103,000 |
| TRUTHSPEAKS INNOVATION FOUNDATION | $70,000 |
| COLUMBIA WORLD PROJECT | $50,000 |
| FUND FOR SOUTHERN COMMUNITIES | $50,000 |
| TRUTHSPEAKS INNOVATION FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| BLACK BELT UNINCORPORATED WASTEWATER PROGRAM | $50,000 |
| APPALACHIAN COMMUNITY FUND | $28,500 |
| AL UNITE | $22,500 |
| DESTINATION LIBERATION INC | $20,000 |
| THE GREATEST INVESTMENT GIRLS EMPOWERMENT PROGRAM | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $697k) land where the poverty rate runs at 26%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
39 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $254k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACAPPALACHIAN COMMUNITY FUND7× · 2018–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +266% · 52% of their budget
- HCHALE COUNTY COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT SOCIETY INC6× · 2018–2024 · $371k · revenue +290% · 100% of their budget
- BKBAMA KIDS INC7× · 2018–2024 · $338k · revenue +337% · 32% of their budget
Funded once
- DCDallas County Family Resource Centerone grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue -59% · 28% of their budget
- GTGOSPEL TABERNACLE CHURCHone grant, 2023 · $150k
- COCOALITION OF CONCERNED FAMILIESone grant, 2023 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Social services
Black Girls Cook aims to empower and inspire inner-city adolescent Black girls through food security, culinary arts, urban farming, entrepreneurship, and STEM, emphasizing Black Diaspora cultural histories and food practices.
The Radical ALLI Center provides free training opportunities for Black youth.
To establish and operate a nonprofit social programs for low income population.
The mission of the Southern Black Policy and Advocacy Network is to improve health outcomes and to reduce social and economic disparities impacting Black communities living in the U.S. South.
Counseling social justice social services outreach
The organization had a gala to raise money for scholarships and community events
Salute Selma Inc. was founded as a nonprofit and organized as a 501 c3 organization. Our commitment is to offer leadership experiences that enhance the knowledge respect and observance of the Selma Voting Rights Movement through…
Out mission is to equip, inform and empower Black families with information on accessing a high quality k-12 education
Alcorn State DC Asso
Education, family support
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Womens Foundation of the South and the most unlike its peers is No More Martyrs. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 12. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 14% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 139 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FUND FOR SOUTHERN COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds APPALACHIAN COMMUNITY FUND ↗
- Who funds HALE COUNTY COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds GREENE COUNTY FOSTER AND ADOPTIVE PARENTS ASSOCIATIONS ↗
- Who funds BAMA KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds Divine Girls Coalition ↗
- Who funds BLACKBELT & CENTRAL ALABAMA HOUSING AUTHORITY ↗
- Who funds Dallas County Family Resource Center ↗
- Who funds DESTINATION LIBERATION ↗
- Who funds THE UNITED CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ASS0 ↗
- Who funds MOORE WRIGHT GROUP ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THEO RATLIFF ↗
- Who funds Alabama Institute for Social Justice ↗
- Who funds WOMEN IN TRAINING INC ↗
- Who funds WATER FINANCE EXCHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds BLACK BELT UNINCORPORATED WASTEWATER PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds The Selma Center for Nonviolence Truth and Reconciliation ↗
- Who funds BVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Society of Folk Arts & Culture ↗
- Who funds BLACK BELT JUSTICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Project Say Something ↗
- Who funds Sowing Seeds of Hope Inc ↗
- Who funds No More Martyrs ↗
- Who funds A T A P COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN OF THE VILLAGE NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds EVERYBLACKGIRL INC ↗
- Who funds Transgender Advocates Knowledgeable Empowering ↗
- Who funds TUSKEGEE UNITED WOMEN'S LEAGUE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Alabama Power Foundation Inc · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Mike and Gillian Goodrich Foundation · Bvm Capacity Building Institute Inc · Tombigbee Resource Conservation and Development Council · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Ala-Tom RC&D Council Inc · Alabama Forward · Southern Partners Fund Inc · International Paper Company Foundation · Alabama Arise · Weaver-Parrish Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Black Belt Community Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.