Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wayne Swanson Charitable Fund

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$219k
Granted FY2021
11
Grants FY2021
3
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Environment$280kArts & Culture$100kYouth Development$18kHuman Services$5k
02FY2021 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $137k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$12,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EARTH JUSTICE$75,000
TROUT UNLIMITED$45,000
STEAMBOAT ART MUSEUM$20,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY$15,000
OPERA STEAMBOAT$15,000
KUNC$12,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
ROCKY MOUNTAIN YOUTH CORPS$10,000
COLORADO CATTLEMAN'S LAND TRUST$10,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$5,000
LIFT UP OF ROUTT COUNTY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LIFT UP OF ROUTT COUNTY: $3k → 6%LIFT UP OF ROUTT COUNTY: $2k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$340k · 8 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +82% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2021, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

$340k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
+6%

Still filing today

75%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Arts & CultureEnvironmentAnimalsHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EARTHJUSTICE
    4× · 2017–2021 · $150k · revenue +82%
  • TU
    TROUT UNLIMITED INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $90k · revenue +133%
  • CR
    COMMUNITY RADIO FOR NORTHERN COLORADO
    4× · 2017–2021 · $25k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • RM
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue -11%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NW COLORADO
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE ORCHESTRA
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Upper Colorado River Alliance
Environment
2
Living Rivers

Living rivers promotes river restoration through mobilization by articulating conservation and alternative management strategies to the public. seeking to revive the natural habitat and spirit of rivers by undoing the extensive damage done…

Environment
3
Rocky Mountain Corporation for Public Broadcasting
—
4
Colorado Jazz Ambassadors
Arts & Culture
5
Colorado Open Lands

Colorado open lands' mission is to preserve the significant open lands and natural heritage of colorado through private and public partnerships, innovative land conservation, and strategic leadership.

Environment
6
Colorado Trout Unlimited

To conserve, protect and restore colorado's coldwater fisheries and their watersheds.

Animals
7
Big Thompson Watershed Coalition

Vision: a healthy and resilient big thompson watershed benefitting fish, wildlife, and the people itserves through collaborative efforts for current and future generations. mission: working with others to take action that protects and…

Environment
8
Colorado Water Trust

To restore water to colorado's rivers.

Environment
9
Western Environmental Law Center

Public interest law firm - the western environmental law center uses the power of the law to foster thriving, resilient western u.s. lands, waters, wildlife, and communities in the face of a changing climate. we envision a thriving west,…

—
10
Rocky Mountain Wild

Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…

Environment
11
California Trout Inc

Caltrout's mission is ensuring healthy water and resilient wild fish for a better california. we share a common vision of a california where healthy waters flow from headwaters to sea. where the diversity and resilience of our waters and…

Animals
12
Wild Salmon Rivers

To conserve functioning salmon/steelhead eco-system at watershed levels, integrate angling activities with basic scientific research, collect raw data, monitor environmental functions, salmon/steelhead population dynamics, public…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rocky Mountain Public Media Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Orchestra. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EARTHJUSTICE: $150,000 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICETROUT UNLIMITED INC: $90,000 · AnimalsTROUT UNLIMITED INCSTEAMBOAT ART MUSEUM: $27,000 · Arts & CultureSTEAMBOAT ART MUSEUMCOMMUNITY RADIO FOR NORTHERN COLORADO: $25,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY RADIO FOR NO…OPERA STEAMBOAT: $22,000 · Arts & CultureOPERA STEAMBOATROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $3,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $2,000 · Arts & CultureTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $30,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVA…Individual grant recipient: $17,000 · OtherIndividual grant re…COLORADO CATTLEMAN'S LAND TRUST: $10,000 · OtherCOLORADO CATTLEMAN'…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $5,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBCHIEF THEATER: $4,000 · OtherCHIEF THEATERBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NW COLORADO: $2,500 · OtherROCKY MOUNTAIN YOUTH CORPS: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentLift Up of Routt County: $4,500 · Human Services
Environment$150,000Animals$90,000Arts & Culture$79,000Other$68,500Youth Development$10,000Human Services$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $150,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED INC: $90,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTEAMBOAT ART MUSEUM: $27,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY RADIO FOR NORTHERN COLORADO: $25,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOPERA STEAMBOAT: $22,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN YOUTH CORPS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLift Up of Routt County: $4,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ORCHESTRA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds TROUT UNLIMITED INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds STEAMBOAT ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY RADIO FOR NORTHERN COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds OPERA STEAMBOAT ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN YOUTH CORPS ↗
  • Who funds Lift Up of Routt County ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ORCHESTRA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Craig-Scheckman Family Foundation · The Duffey Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wayne Swanson Charitable Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wayne Swanson Charitable Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Wayne Swanson Charitable Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Wayne Swanson Charitable Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wayne Swanson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph