Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wasserstrom Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$287k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Philanthropy$552kHealth$310kReligion$227kEducation$198kFood & Nutrition$83kHuman Services$38kPublic Safety & Disaster$28kCivil Rights$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $108k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$9,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$7.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Jewish ColumbusAnnual Campaign$100,000
Nationwide Childrens Hosp Found$50,000
JFEDLA$25,000
Columbus St Com Coll Culinary Sch$22,500
Jewish Family Services$20,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Jewish Columbus$10,000
Ohio Restaurant Hospitaltity$10,000
Lifetown$10,000
Bexley Community Foundation$9,000
Columbus Jewish Day School$5,000
Jewish Community Center$3,500
The Ohio State Foundation$3,000
Friends of Israaeli Defense$2,500
Community Found Texas Hill Country$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Jewish Family Services: $20k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 14 repeat orgs$291k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
17

Total granted

$1.1M
$242k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
0%

Still filing today

36%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsReligionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • J
    JewishColumbus
    2× · 2021–2025 · $105k · revenue +89%
  • TC
    THE COLUMBUS JEWISH DAY SCHOOL
    3× · 2022–2025 · $30k · revenue +33%
  • JC
    Jewish Community Center Of Cincinnati
    4× · 2022–2025 · $18k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • TO
    The Ohio State University
    one grant, 2021 · $152k
  • NC
    Nationwide Children's Hospital
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2024–2025 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Family Service of the Cincinnati Area

A social service agency, JFS strengthens lives and our diverse community by providing exceptional and transformational human services. Services include: Counseling, Case Management, Financial and Food Support, Home Care, Senior Services,…

Human Services
2
Jewish Federation of Cincinnati

The Jewish Federation of Cincinnati develops and connects leaders, contributors, organizations, and ideas to build an inclusive Jewish community that helps people in need, supports Israel, and assures a vibrant Jewish future.

Philanthropy
3
The Jewish Foundation of Cincinnati
Philanthropy
4
Commission On Cemetery Preservation

Further the charitable, educational, and religious purposes of the jewish federation of cleveland including the preservation of jewish cemeteries

—
5
Hillel the Foundation of Jewish Campus Life

The purpose of Hillel is to be a center for enriching the lives of Jewish students in the Greater Cincinnati area and to strengthen Jewish identity through social and a broad range of programs and services in an atmosphere that is…

—
6
Jewish Federation of Greater Dayton Inc

The jewish federation of greater dayton is the central organization established to further the welfare of the jewish community. the federation coordinates social, welfare and cultural programs; fosters cooperation among jewish…

Philanthropy
7
Jewish Community of Ottawa Development Foundation

To raise funds and apply them to local charities including a jewish community centre, home for the aged, school and synagogue.

Philanthropy
8
Jewish Cemeteries of Greater Cincinnati Inc

Jewish Cemeteries of Greater Cincinnati, Inc. serves the burial needs of the Greater Cincinnati Jewish community with care and dignity and honors the resting places of our people.

—
9
Toledo Board of Jewish Education

To promote jewish learning and to vitalize jewish life through jewish education.

—
10
Jewish Childrens Museum

To further jewish historical education among youths

Arts & Culture
11
Des Moines Jewish Foundation

The foundation was structured to encourage funding of the jewish federation of greater des moines, and is responsible for adding financial stability by broadening the funding base and thereby improving the ability of the des moines jewish…

—
12
Jewish Community Council of Erie

The Jewish Community Council of Erie is a community-based organization serving individuals and families in the Erie area with a wide range of social and educational services, as well as capacity-building support to other community-based…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is JewishColumbus; the most unlike its peers is Bexley Area Chamber of Commerce. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Jewish ColumbusAnnual Campaign: $535,000 · OtherJewish ColumbusAnnual CampaignNationwide Childrens Hosp Found: $200,000 · OtherNationwide Childrens Hosp FoundThe Ohio State University: $152,000 · OtherThe Ohio State UniversityColumbus St Com Coll Culinary Sch: $82,500 · OtherColumbus St Com Coll Culinary SchOhio Restaurant Hospitaltity: $60,000 · OtherNationwide Children's Hospital: $50,000 · Other+19 more: $159,836 · Other+19 moreJewishColumbus: $105,000 · ReligionBEXLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $46,572 · PhilanthropyJewish Federation of Columbus: $36,000 · PhilanthropyColumbus Jewish Foundation: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COLUMBUS JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $30,000 · EducationTHE OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES: $2,000 · EducationJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $20,000 · Human ServicesCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesJewish Community Center Of Cincinnati: $17,500 · Recreation & SportsOHIO HISTORY CONNECTION: $3,000 · Arts & CultureCOLUMBUS JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,500 · Arts & CultureDECORATIVE ARTS CENTER OF OHIO: $500 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE DREXEL INC: $500 · Arts & CultureBEXLEY AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $1,500 · Community Improvement
Other$1,239,336Religion$105,000Philanthropy$102,572Education$32,000Human Services$25,000Recreation & Sports$17,500Arts & Culture$6,500Community Improvement$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJewishColumbus: $105,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetBEXLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $46,572 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetJewish Federation of Columbus: $36,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE COLUMBUS JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $30,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetColumbus Jewish Foundation: $20,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Community Center Of Cincinnati: $17,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBEXLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO HISTORY CONNECTION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBUS JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,500 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTHE OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEXLEY AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $1,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetDECORATIVE ARTS CENTER OF OHIO: $500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE DREXEL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JewishColumbus ↗
  • Who funds BEXLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Federation of Columbus ↗
  • Who funds THE COLUMBUS JEWISH DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Columbus Jewish Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Community Center Of Cincinnati ↗
  • Who funds BEXLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds OHIO HISTORY CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES ↗
  • Who funds BEXLEY AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds DECORATIVE ARTS CENTER OF OHIO ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE DREXEL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbus FoundationOH25.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · Jay and Jean Schottenstein Foundation · Allene N Gilman Charitable Trust · Lori Schottenstein Foundation · Lippy Foundation · The Simson Foundation · The Wexner Family Charitable Fund · Columbus Jewish Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wasserstrom Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wasserstrom Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Wasserstrom Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Wasserstrom Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wasserstrom’s filings →

    More from the funding graph