Skip to content
Plinth
← FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

Utah · Nonprofit

WASATCH PEAKS FOUNDATION

WASATCH PEAKS FOUNDATION (Utah) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $1,200 to it, the largest being American United Charitable Foundation ($1,200). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$393k
Revenue FY2025
1
Funders on record
$1k
Grants received
$78k
Net assets
0/1 repeat funders

Against its field

WASATCH PEAKS FOUNDATION has grown faster than three-quarters of the 1,762 public benefit nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−7% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve2.3mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)34% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,762 public benefit nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2022, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2022, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20222022 Revenue 100 ($164k) Expenses 100 ($127k) Net assets 100 ($36k)2023 Revenue 160 ($261k) Expenses 176 ($225k) Net assets 201 ($73k)2024 Revenue 176 ($289k) Expenses 211 ($269k) Net assets 288 ($104k)2025 Revenue 240 ($393k) Expenses 330 ($420k) Net assets 215 ($78k)
2022202320242025
Revenue (240)Expenses (330)Net assets (215)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2023 0% · 2024 0% · 2025 29%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

100% of WASATCH PEAKS FOUNDATION’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (84% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 3,530 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 4 reported years ran a deficit.

$36k
22
$37k
23
$20k
24
$26k
25
2.3
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.

Funder
'25*
total
funders
1

From the IRS filings of WASATCH PEAKS FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of WASATCH PEAKS FOUNDATION's grant income comes from Utah funders.

UT

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like WASATCH PEAKS FOUNDATION

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Utah

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

100% of spending goes to programs.

Program 100%Management 0%Fundraising 0%

Governance

10
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WASATCH PEAKS FOUNDATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds WASATCH PEAKS FOUNDATION?
WASATCH PEAKS FOUNDATION (Utah) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $1,200 to it, the largest being American United Charitable Foundation ($1,200). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does WASATCH PEAKS FOUNDATION have?
IRS filings report 1 organization giving $1,200 in grants to WASATCH PEAKS FOUNDATION.
Who is the largest funder of WASATCH PEAKS FOUNDATION?
American United Charitable Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $1,200 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like WASATCH PEAKS FOUNDATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Utah. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2022–2025), and the filings of 1funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing