Skip to content

· Private foundation

Warren & Katharine Schlinger Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
42
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$3.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$36MEducation$8.1MAnimals$6.8MScience & Tech$5.8MYouth Development$2.8MInternational$2.2MHealth$1.4MReligion$1.0MOther$0
02FY2024 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $75k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $330k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $870k
  • $250k+7 grants · $8.0M
$20,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$100M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCHLINGER CHRISMAN FOUNDATION$3,000,000
SCHLINGER FAMILY FOUNDATION$3,000,000
UC REGENTS-BOOST AT BERKELEY HAAS (UC REGENTS - YOUNG ENTERPRENEUR)$700,000
TONY LARUSSAS ANIMAL RESCUE FOUNDATION$500,000
HUMAN OUTREACH PROJECT$300,000
NORTHERN LIGHT SCHOOL$250,000
BOYS AND GIRLS OF NORTH LAKE TAHOE$250,000
BEAR LEAGUE$200,000
INTERNATIONAL OCD FOUNDATION$155,000
CHILDREN GIVING GIFTS INC$155,000
THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE$110,000
COMMUNITY CONCERN FOR CATS$100,000
LAKE TAHOE WILDLIFE CARE INC$75,000
LINDSAY WILDLIFE EXPERIENCE$75,000
UC SANTA BARBARA CHEMICAL ENGINEERING$45,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 8% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HUMAN OUTREACH PROJECT: $350k → 8%HUMAN OUTREACH PROJECT: $350k → 8%HUMAN OUTREACH PROJECT: $300k → 8%HUMAN OUTREACH PROJECT: $300k → 8%HUMAN OUTREACH PROJECT: $250k → 8%HUMAN OUTREACH PROJECT: $250k → 8%HUMAN OUTREACH PROJECT: $150k → 8%HUMAN OUTREACH PROJECT: $150k → 8%J-SEI-INC: $5k → 10%J-SEI-INC: $5k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $7k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $16k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%PILGRIM PLACE: $12k → 14%PILGRIM PLACE: $10k → 14%PILGRIM PLACE: $10k → 14%PILGRIM PLACE: $8k → 14%PILGRIM PLACE: $5k → 14%PILGRIM PLACE: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$65M · 52 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

52 repeat relationships: 41 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

52
1

Total granted

$65M
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+10%

Still filing today

63%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationArts & CultureAnimalsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SCHLINGER CHRISMAN FOUNDATION NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY TRUSTEE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $20M · revenue +194% · 100% of their budget
  • CI
    CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
    7× · 2017–2023 · $4.8M · revenue +14%
  • JP
    Joybound People and Pets FKA Tony La Russa's Animal Rescue Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3.4M · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • VC
    VITAS COMMUNITY CONNECTION
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Institute for BioMedical Research

Our mission is to build a unique institute that bridges basic research and drug discovery, and that attracts the best and brightest scientists, physicians and students to work together synergistically to find cures for neglected human…

—
2
Claremont Graduate University

Claremont Graduate University prepares individuals to be leaders for positive change in the world. Unique in its transdisciplinary approach, the University is dedicated to the creation, dissemination, and application of new knowledge and…

Education
3
Pitzer College

Pitzer College produces engaged socially responsible citizens of the world through an academically rigorous, interdisciplinary liberal arts education emphasizing social justice, intercultural understanding and environmental sensitivity.…

Education
4
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
5
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
6
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
7
California Life Sciences Association

Clsa advances californias world-leading life sciences innovation ecosystem by advocating for effective national, state and local public policies and supporting entrepreneurs and life sciences businesses.

Community Improvement
8
The California Medical Innovations Institute Inc

The Institute is a scientific research center dedicated to conducting basic and applied research to advance the understanding of human disease and the improvement of human health. The Institute fosters an innovative research environment…

Education
9
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
10
Santa Catalina Island Conservancy

The catalina island conservancy protects and stewards 88% of catalina island. more than 42,000 acres of wildlands, coves and coastal habitats. founded to preserve the island's natural resources, the conservancy advances a mission rooted in…

—
11
Harvey Mudd College

HMC seeks to educate engineers, scientists, and mathematicians well versed in all of these areas and in the humanities, social sciences and the arts so that they may assume leadership in their fields with a clear understanding of the…

Education
12
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Villa Esperanza Services; the most unlike its peers is Schlinger Chrisman Foundation Northern Trust Company Trustee. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
25/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SCHLINGER FAMILY FOUNDATION: $18,807,000 · OtherSCHLINGER FAMILY FOUNDATIONUC REGENTS-BOOST AT BERKELEY HAAS (UC REGENTS - YOUNG ENTERPRENEUR): $2,750,000 · OtherUC REGENTS-BOOST AT BERKELEY HAAS (UC REGENTS - YO…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH LAKE TAHOE: $1,100,000 · Other+30 more: $6,349,000 · Other+30 moreSCHLINGER CHRISMAN FOUNDATION NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY TRUSTEE: $19,682,000 · PhilanthropySCHLINGER CHRISMAN FOUNDATION NORT…CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $4,780,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA …Northern Light School: $1,345,000 · EducationNorthern Li…+3 more: $244,500 · EducationJoybound People and Pets FKA Tony La Russa's Animal Rescue Foundation: $3,350,000 · AnimalsJoybound P…BEAR LEAGUE: $1,350,000 · AnimalsBEAR LEAGU…COMMUNITY CONCERN FOR CATS INC: $1,100,000 · AnimalsCOMMUNITY …+1 more: $155,000 · AnimalsHUMAN OUTREACH PROJECT: $2,100,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $112,000 · Human Services+2 more: $60,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN GIVING GIFTS: $941,500 · ReligionInternational OCD Foundation Inc: $485,000 · HealthTOURETTE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC: $170,000 · HealthPasadena Hospital Association Ltd: $132,500 · HealthVITAS COMMUNITY CONNECTION: $50,000 · HealthHUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES: $47,500 · HealthUSC ARCADIA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $43,000 · Health
Other$29,006,000Philanthropy$19,682,000Education$6,369,500Animals$5,955,000Human Services$2,272,000Religion$941,500Health$928,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSCHLINGER CHRISMAN FOUNDATION NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY TRUSTEE: $19,682,000 over 8y, 100% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $4,780,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJoybound People and Pets FKA Tony La Russa's Animal Rescue Foundation: $3,350,000 over 8y, 4.0% of budgetHUMAN OUTREACH PROJECT: $2,100,000 over 8y, 92% of budgetBEAR LEAGUE: $1,350,000 over 8y, 74% of budgetNorthern Light School: $1,345,000 over 8y, 5.4% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH LAKE TAHOE: $1,100,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetCOMMUNITY CONCERN FOR CATS INC: $1,100,000 over 8y, 28% of budgetCHILDREN GIVING GIFTS: $941,500 over 8y, 99% of budgetInternational OCD Foundation Inc: $485,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetLake Tahoe Wildlife Care Inc: $400,000 over 5y, 8.3% of budgetLINDSAY WILDLIFE MUSEUM: $400,000 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetTHE COLEMAN CHAMBER MUSIC ASSOCIATION: $235,000 over 6y, 47% of budgetTOURETTE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC: $170,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetCarmel Bach Festival Inc: $155,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetTHE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE: $155,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetContra Costa Interfaith Transitional Housing Inc: $145,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetMAMMOTH LAKES FOUNDATION: $140,000 over 6y, 10% of budgetPasadena Hospital Association Ltd: $132,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $112,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIMAS SHERIFF BOOSTER CLUB INC: $90,000 over 2y, 87% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $87,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVILLA ESPERANZA SERVICES: $76,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetScripps College: $68,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLAREMONT INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF STATESMANSHIP & POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY: $59,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLeadership Institute: $59,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLa Verne San Dimas Meals on Wheels: $50,000 over 2y, 28% of budgetPILGRIM PLACE: $50,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES: $47,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetYoung America's Foundation: $43,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUSC ARCADIA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $43,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPasadena Conservatory of Music: $27,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetJ-SEI INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SCHLINGER CHRISMAN FOUNDATION NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY TRUSTEE ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds Joybound People and Pets FKA Tony La Russa's Animal Rescue Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN OUTREACH PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds BEAR LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds Northern Light School ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH LAKE TAHOE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CONCERN FOR CATS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN GIVING GIFTS ↗
  • Who funds International OCD Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Lake Tahoe Wildlife Care Inc ↗
  • Who funds LINDSAY WILDLIFE MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds THE COLEMAN CHAMBER MUSIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds TOURETTE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds Carmel Bach Festival Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE ↗
  • Who funds Contra Costa Interfaith Transitional Housing Inc ↗
  • Who funds MAMMOTH LAKES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIMAS SHERIFF BOOSTER CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds VILLA ESPERANZA SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Scripps College ↗
  • Who funds THE CLAREMONT INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF STATESMANSHIP & POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Schlinger Chrisman Foundation Northern Trust Company TrusteeIL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Schlinger Chrisman Foundation Northern Trust Company Trustee · Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide Foundation · Pasadena Community Foundation · California Community Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · McKesson Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Verizon Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Warren & Katharine Schlinger Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Warren & Katharine Schlinger Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Warren & Katharine Schlinger Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Warren & Katharine Schlinger Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Warren & Katharine Schlinger’s filings →

    More from the funding graph