Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Wardeberg Charitable Trust- Ua Dtd 330 Deanna Wardeberg Trustee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$344k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$333k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$944kHealth$66kRecreation & Sports$20kEducation$4kPhilanthropy$4kArts & Culture$3kHuman Services$2kCommunity Improvement$250Other$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $11k
  • $250k+1 grant · $333k
$1,700
Median grant
1
States reached
$88k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH$333,000
FGCU MEN'S GOLF FOUNDATION$7,500
MOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION$1,700
GULFSHORE PLAYHOUSE$1,200
NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY: $600 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.0M · 9 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
13

Total granted

$1.0M
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+80%

Still filing today

44%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesAnimalsEmploymentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $4k · revenue +14%
  • GULFSHORE PLAYHOUSE INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $3k · revenue +15%
  • BF
    BOOKS FOR COLLIER KIDS INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $2k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • FP
    FOX POINT LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • BP
    BASCOM PALMER EYE INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2019 · $9k
  • NH
    NCH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

2
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

3
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

4
North Shore Health System Medical Faculty Group Practice

North shore health system medical faculty group practice (the corporation) functions as an extension of the northwell health hospitals by bringing medical care to community settings, providing care to medicare, medicaid, and other…

Health
5
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

6
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
7
Indiana University Health Care Associates Inc

To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…

Health
8
Ochsner Clinic Foundation

We serve, heal, lead, educate and innovate.

Health
9
Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
10
Miami Valley Hospital Foundation

Enhance the patient and family experience at miami valley hospital by raising community support for cutting-edge programs and services which help build healthy communities.

Health
11
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
12
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Moorings Park Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Emmanuel Academies Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
11/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH INC — $932,600 · OtherEMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH INCNCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM CENTER FOR PHILANTHROPY — $37,500 · Other+13 more — $49,770 · OtherMAYO CLINIC — $10,200 · HealthNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC — $4,000 · Health+1 more — $300 · HealthGULFSHORE PLAYHOUSE INC — $2,950 · Arts & CultureBOOKS FOR COLLIER KIDS INC — $2,350 · EducationTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $200 · EducationMOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION INC — $1,700 · Human ServicesFun Time Early Childhood Academy Inc — $600 · Human ServicesEmmanuel Academies Inc — $500 · EmploymentINTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC — $100 · Animals
Other$1,019,870Health$14,500Arts & Culture$2,950Education$2,550Human Services$2,300Employment$500Animals$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMAYO CLINIC — $10,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC — $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGULFSHORE PLAYHOUSE INC — $2,950 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOOKS FOR COLLIER KIDS INC — $2,350 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $1,850 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFun Time Early Childhood Academy Inc — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmmanuel Academies Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAvow Foundation Inc — $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC
  • Who funds GULFSHORE PLAYHOUSE INC
  • Who funds BOOKS FOR COLLIER KIDS INC
  • Who funds COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Fun Time Early Childhood Academy Inc
  • Who funds Emmanuel Academies Inc
  • Who funds Avow Foundation Inc
  • Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ayco Charitable FoundationNY12.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ayco Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Wardeberg Charitable Trust- Ua Dtd 330 Deanna Wardeberg Trustee funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Gulfshore Playhouse Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph