Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ward Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$252k
Granted FY2025still arriving
37
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$554kEducation$541kRecreation & Sports$203kHuman Services$108kFood & Nutrition$83kPublic Safety & Disaster$44kReligion$36kHousing & Shelter$34kOther$0
02FY2025 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $72k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $181k
$5,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Good Sports$26,000
Boston Children's Hospital Trust$26,000
Jackson County Library Foundation$15,000
CureSearch L McGuire Legacy Fund$13,000
Ashland Community Food Bank$10,793
Camp One Step$10,000
Camp Sunshine$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Luke McGuire Memorial Scholarship$10,000
Caring Unlimited$10,000
Camp Sunshine$10,000
Luke McGuire Memorial Scholarship$10,000
Camp Ta-Kum-Ta$10,000
Luke McGuire Memorial Scholarship$10,000
Blossburg Memorial Library$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $62k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Misericordia Foundation: $5k → 14%Second Story: $8k → 6%Caring Unlimited: $10k → 9%Misericordia Foundation: $4k → 14%Caring Unlimited: $10k → 9%Misericordia Foundation: $4k → 14%Misericordia Foundation: $4k → 14%Centro Tepeyac: $3k → 8%Sarah's Inn: $1k → 14%Sarah's Inn: $1k → 14%Centro Tepeyac: $2k → 8%Sarah's Inn: $500 → 14%Centro Tepeyac: $2k → 8%Centro Tepeyac: $2k → 8%Centro Tepeyac: $2k → 8%Centro Tepeyac: $1k → 8%Centro Tepeyac: $1k → 8%Centro Tepeyac: $1k → 8%Centro Tepeyac: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
IN
PA
VA
MD
DE
DC
LA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 51 repeat orgs$255k to everyone else

51 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
14

Total granted

$1.6M
$185k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+53%

Still filing today

45%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Children's Hospital Corporation
    2× · 2023–2025 · $51k · revenue +17%
  • BM
    BLOSSBURG MEMORIAL LIBRARY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $47k · revenue +35%
  • S
    SPOONFULS
    4× · 2020–2025 · $44k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • SP
    ST PAUL VI CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • BA
    Blossburg Area Swim Assoc
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • K9S FOR WARRIORS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +12%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
2
Oncology and Kids Inc

To help kids and families heal the emotional scars of childhood cancer and learn to thrive.

Human Services
3
Children's Miracle Network

Children's miracle network (dba "children's miracle network hospitals") works to save kids' lives by bringing people together to raise money for children's healthcare in local communities.

Unclassified
4
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Greater Charlotte Inc

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Greater Charlotte (RMHC of GC) provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare. Charlotte is recognized as a leading destination…

Human Services
5
Brighton Marine Inc

Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.

Health
6
Children's Home Society of North Carolina Inc

The Children's Home Society of North Carolina's mission is to promote the right of every child to a permanent, safe, and loving family.

Human Services
7
Camp Casco Inc

Camp Casco builds community for families affected by childhood cancer in New England through free camps and social opportunities.

Recreation & Sports
8
Boston Community Pediatrics Inc

Boston community pediatrics (bcp) provides ambulatory pediatric and related health care services to the residents of boston, massachusetts, and surrounding communities. bcp is a new model of innovative pediatric healthcare that addresses…

Health
9
CancerFree Kids

CancerFree KIDS exists to raise awareness of the need for more funding for pediatric cancer research and to raise funds that are invested in early stage, potentially game-changing research focused on gentler treatments and cures for…

Health
10
Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program Inc

The mission of the boston health care for the homeless program (bhchp) is to provide or assure access to the highest quality health care for all individuals and families experiencing homelessness in our community.

Human Services
11
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
12
The Curetivity Foundation

Provide monetary or financial aid exclusively for charitable, religious, scientific, literary or educational purposes and to solicit, receive, maintain and disburse funds for these purposes and for the betterment of children.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Good Sports Inc and the most unlike its peers is Blossburg Firemen's Ambulance Assoc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersYouth Sports Booster Organi…Domestic Violence Crisis Se…Animal Rescue and AdoptionPublic Library SupportChristian Youth CampsPregnancy Support ServicesFood Pantries & AssistanceCancer Support Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%31%35–55yr16%15%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/36
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,529

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
21/32
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Luke McGuire Memorial Scholarship — $363,967 · OtherLuke McGuire Memorial ScholarshipCure Search for Children — $216,800 · OtherCure Search for ChildrenIndividual grant recipient — $70,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCamp One Step at a Time — $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherST PAUL VI CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL — $50,000 · OtherBlossburg Area Swim Assoc — $50,000 · Other+40 more — $418,571 · Other+40 moreVERMONTS CAMP TA-KUM-TA — $90,000 · HealthVERMONTS CAMP TA…Children's Hospital Corporation — $51,000 · HealthChildren's Hospi…Sacopee Valley Health Center — $30,000 · HealthSacopee Valley H…STILLBRAVE CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $29,753 · HealthSTILLBRAVE CHILD…Childrens Oncology Services Inc — $20,000 · HealthChildrens Oncolo…THE MERCY HEALTH CLINIC INC — $13,500 · HealthCAMP CAN DO 2014 INC — $10,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $10,000 · Health+3 more — $12,000 · HealthSPOONFULS — $44,000 · Food & NutritionBEYOND HUNGER — $28,000 · Food & NutritionBLOSSBURG MEMORIAL LIBRARY — $47,300 · EducationJackson County Library Foundation — $15,000 · EducationA WIDER CIRCLE INC — $7,500 · EducationCARING UNLIMITED — $20,000 · Human ServicesMISERICORDIA FOUNDATION — $17,000 · Human ServicesCENTRO TEPEYAC INC — $14,500 · Human ServicesABUSED AND HOMELESS CHILDREN'S REFUGE INC — $7,650 · Human ServicesSARAH'S INN — $2,500 · Human ServicesCAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC — $30,000 · Recreation & SportsHARBOR CAMPS INC — $20,000 · Recreation & SportsSERVE AND RETURN CHICAGO — $7,000 · Recreation & SportsGOOD SPORTS INC — $26,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,279,338Health$266,253Food & Nutrition$72,000Education$69,800Human Services$61,650Recreation & Sports$57,000Youth Development$26,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVERMONTS CAMP TA-KUM-TA — $90,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $51,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOSSBURG MEMORIAL LIBRARY — $47,300 over 9y, 4.9% of budgetSPOONFULS — $44,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSacopee Valley Health Center — $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHealth Care Without Walls Inc — $30,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetCAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSTILLBRAVE CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $29,753 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetBEYOND HUNGER — $28,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCARING UNLIMITED — $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetChildrens Oncology Services Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHARBOR CAMPS INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOME INC — $17,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMISERICORDIA FOUNDATION — $17,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJackson County Library Foundation — $15,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetCENTRO TEPEYAC INC — $14,500 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetTHE MERCY HEALTH CLINIC INC — $13,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP CAN DO 2014 INC — $10,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABUSED AND HOMELESS CHILDREN'S REFUGE INC — $7,650 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetA WIDER CIRCLE INC — $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSERVE AND RETURN CHICAGO — $7,000 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetFriendship Place — $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOak Park River Forest Infant Welfare S — $6,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC — $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetIllinois Spina Bifida Association — $4,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSARAH'S INN — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLOSSBURG FIREMEN'S AMBULANCE ASSOC — $2,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetPURA Syndrome Foundation — $1,500 over 2y, 1.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VERMONTS CAMP TA-KUM-TA
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation
  • Who funds BLOSSBURG MEMORIAL LIBRARY
  • Who funds SPOONFULS
  • Who funds Sacopee Valley Health Center
  • Who funds Health Care Without Walls Inc
  • Who funds CAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC
  • Who funds STILLBRAVE CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds BEYOND HUNGER
  • Who funds GOOD SPORTS INC
  • Who funds CARING UNLIMITED
  • Who funds Childrens Oncology Services Inc
  • Who funds HARBOR CAMPS INC
  • Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC
  • Who funds SOME INC
  • Who funds MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Jackson County Library Foundation
  • Who funds CENTRO TEPEYAC INC
  • Who funds THE MERCY HEALTH CLINIC INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Usg Foundation IncIL15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Usg Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Good Heart Work Smart Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ward Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
  • A Wider Circle Inc6% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph