Skip to content

· Private foundation

Walter S Quinlan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$628k
Granted FY2020
32
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$157k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

63% of Walter S Quinlan Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The Springfield Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 15 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Walter S Quinlan Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 13 organizations, $628k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
’17
9
’18
12
’19
13
’20
11
’21
13
’22
11
’23
13
’24
15
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$2.4MArts & Culture$954kEducation$786kHealth$351kCommunity Improvement$304kRecreation & Sports$272kEnvironment$173kHuman Services$155kOther$0
02FY2020 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k19 grants · $57k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $159k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $413k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$9.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPRINGFIELD FOUNDATION$156,508
SPRINGFORWARD$125,000
WHITTENBERG UNIVERSITY$67,000
SPRINGFIELD MUSEUM OF ART$64,000
WESCOTT HOUSE FOUNDATION$32,500
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD OH$25,000
ST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY$23,500
THE GAMMON HOUSE$20,000
OHIO TRI COUNTY FOOD ALLIANCE$15,000
SNYDER PARK GARDENS-ARBORETUM$12,500
DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$10,000
REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NE NEW YORK$10,000
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$10,000
COMMUNITY MERCY FOUNDATION$5,000
RIDGEWOOD SCHOOL$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PROJECT WOMAN: $25k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 41 repeat orgs$337k to everyone else

41 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2020, 12 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
3

Total granted

$3.0M
$218k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+19%

Still filing today

34%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SPRINGFIELD CATHOLIC CENTRAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $301k · revenue +104% · 32% of their budget
  • WH
    WESTCOTT HOUSE FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $181k · revenue +19%
  • GH
    GAMMON HOUSE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $123k · revenue +56% · 64% of their budget

Funded once

  • NT
    NATIONAL TRAIL PARKS AND RECREATION
    one grant, 2017 · $200k
  • SP
    SNYDER PARK GARDENS
    one grant, 2018 · $13k
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Springfield College

The mission of springfield college is to educate students in spirit, mind and body for leadership in service to others by building on a foundation of the college's humanics philosophy, academic excellence, service, and student success.…

Education
2
Springfield Daily Citizen Inc

The mission of the springfield daily citizen is to inform our community and be a catalyst for good.

Arts & Culture
3
Cincinnati Preservation Association

To empower and educate people to value, preserve and save greater cincinnati's historic buildings, communities, landscapes and stories.

Arts & Culture
4
Springfield Museums Corporation

The springfield museums corporation is a non-profit organization which holds and cares for collections in the fields of art, history, and science and makes them accessible for educational, recreational and informational purposes to a…

Education
5
University of Iowa Facilities Corporation

The university of iowa facilities corporation acquires and holds property for the benefit and use of the university of iowa.

—
6
Springmont School Inc

Springmont provides a learning environment where diversity of thought and global perspective empower students to be inquisitive, knowledgeable, independent, compassionate and effective.

—
7
Springfield Historic Landmark Preservation Foundation Inc

To preserve and protect historic buildings in and around springfield, ohio, including specifically the clubhouse and golf course deemed historically and/or architecturally significant of springfield county club, in order to perpetuate the…

Arts & Culture
8
Community Improvement Corporation of Springfield-Clark County

Economic development of springfield and clark county ohio.

Community Improvement
9
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
10
Springfield Ballet Inc

Dedicated to advancing the art of ballet through premier education, performance, outreach and collaberation.

Arts & Culture
11
The Democracy Collaborative Foundation Inc

See schedule othe democracy collaborative was established in 2000 to advance understanding of democracy for the 21st century and to promote emerging strategies and innovations in community development that enhance democratic life. in…

Education
12
Rockford University

To educate men & women to lead responsible lives by means of a curriculum grounded in liberal arts learning and complemented and extended by professional and practical experience, through the total academic and co-curricular experience,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Springfield Museum of Art; the most unlike its peers is Stamford Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
12/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SPRINGFIELD FOUNDATION: $2,406,538 · PhilanthropyTHE SPRINGFIELD FOUNDATIONWHITTENBERG UNIVERSITY: $327,000 · OtherWHITTENBERG UNIVERSITYSPRINGFIELD CATHOLIC CENTRAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $301,000 · OtherSPRINGFIELD CATHOLIC CENTRAL SCHOOL FOUN…ST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY: $280,500 · OtherST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETYNATIONAL TRAIL PARKS AND RECREATION: $200,000 · OtherNATIONAL TRAIL PARKS AND RECREATIONCOMMUNITY MERCY FOUNDATION: $110,000 · OtherSNYDER PARK GARDENS-ARBORETUM: $93,500 · OtherSOUTH FOUNTAIN PRESERVATION INC: $82,500 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $82,000 · Other+37 more: $608,500 · Other+37 moreSPRINGFIELD MUSEUM OF ART: $436,000 · Arts & CultureSPRINGFIELD MUSEUM O…SPRINGFORWARD: $275,000 · Arts & CultureSPRINGFORWARDWESTCOTT HOUSE FOUNDATION: $181,250 · Arts & CultureWESTCOTT HOUSE FOUND…GAMMON HOUSE INC: $122,500 · Arts & CultureGAMMON HOUSE INC+1 more: $13,500 · Arts & CultureNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $79,500 · EnvironmentCLARK COUNTY LITERACY COALITION: $40,750 · EducationUniversity of Dayton: $22,000 · EducationSAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA: $13,500 · EducationRIDGEWOOD SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $3,000 · EducationDAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $70,000 · HealthPROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY: $25,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION: $5,000 · Human Services
Philanthropy$2,406,538Other$2,085,000Arts & Culture$1,028,250Environment$79,500Education$79,250Health$70,000Human Services$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SPRINGFIELD FOUNDATION: $2,406,538 over 9y, 4.9% of budgetSPRINGFIELD MUSEUM OF ART: $436,000 over 9y, 5.2% of budgetSPRINGFIELD CATHOLIC CENTRAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $301,000 over 9y, 32% of budgetSPRINGFORWARD: $275,000 over 4y, 53% of budgetWESTCOTT HOUSE FOUNDATION: $181,250 over 9y, 6.2% of budgetGAMMON HOUSE INC: $122,500 over 7y, 64% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $79,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $70,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCLARK COUNTY LITERACY COALITION: $40,750 over 9y, 3.0% of budgetSpringfield Arts Council Inc: $28,750 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetOHIO TRI COUNTY FOOD ALLIANCE DBA SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $25,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetUniversity of Dayton: $22,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetON-THE-RISE: $15,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetCHAMPAIGN AVIATION MUSEUM: $13,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA: $13,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetStamford Library: $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIDGEWOOD SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SPRINGFIELD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGFIELD MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGFIELD CATHOLIC CENTRAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGFORWARD ↗
  • Who funds WESTCOTT HOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GAMMON HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds CLARK COUNTY LITERACY COALITION ↗
  • Who funds Springfield Arts Council Inc ↗
  • Who funds OHIO TRI COUNTY FOOD ALLIANCE DBA SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds University of Dayton ↗
  • Who funds ON-THE-RISE ↗
  • Who funds CHAMPAIGN AVIATION MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds SAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Springfield FoundationOH30.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Springfield Foundation · Harry and Violet Turner 95 Charitable Trust · Della Selsor Tr Uw · Assurant Foundation · The United Way of Clark Champaign & Madison Counties Inc · Wilson Sheehan Foundation · Community Hospital Health Services Foundation · Park National Corporation Foundation · Crabill Family Foundation · Dayton Foundation Depository · The Tiller Family Foundation · Taj Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Walter S Quinlan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Walter S Quinlan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Walter S Quinlan Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Walter S Quinlan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Walter S Quinlan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph