Skip to content

· Private foundation

Walter S Pierce Foundation Inc Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$47k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$110kHousing & Shelter$62kReligion$46kFood & Nutrition$43kHealth$34kHuman Services$12kYouth Development$9kEnvironment$7k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$3,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$937k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CRISTO REY TAMPA HIGH SCHOOL$12,500
Individual grant recipient$5,500
METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES$5,000
FEEDING TAMPA BAY$4,000
CHILDREN'S HOME NETWORK$4,000
LOVE INC OF METRO TAMPA$3,500
MEALS ON WHEELS OF TAMPA$3,500
ST LAWRENCE CATHOLIC CHURCH$3,000
JUDEO CHRISTIAN HEALTH CLINIC INC$3,000
LIFE PATH HOSPICE$1,500
THE SOCIETY OF SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $7k → 13%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $7k → 13%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $5k → 13%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $4k → 13%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $4k → 13%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $3k → 13%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $3k → 13%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$319k · 14 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
2

Total granted

$319k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+94%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHealthHuman ServicesReligionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $35k · revenue +97%
  • MO
    Meals on Wheels of Tampa Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $29k · revenue +12%
  • LI
    LOVE INC OF METRO TAMPA INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $25k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SPRING OF TAMPA BAY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +94%
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tampabay-Job-Links Inc
—
2
Tampa Homeless Outreach Inc

To identify, locate, and aid homeless individuals-specifically veterans-by providing emergency assistance, necessities, and housing resources

Human Services
3
360 Eats

We strive to end hunger and food waste in the Tampa Bay community through innovative solutions that rescue and redistribute fresh, healthy surplus food, while also providing job training for those facing employment barriers.

Food & Nutrition
4
Meals On Wheels Plus of Manatee Inc

The mission of meals on wheels plus of manatee, inc. is to assist individuals to live independently by providing nutrition and caring supportive services.

Food & Nutrition
5
Our Daily Bread Tampa Bay Inc

Our Daily Bread Tampa Bay provides food and other services to needy families and Veterans in Tampa Bay.

—
6
Victory At Sarasota Inc

We are a church, food bank, outreach that ministers the love of Jesus to our city and the surrounding cities by preaching and teaching the word of God every Sunday. We also minister to anyone with a food need weekly through our food bank.…

Religion
7
Christian Service Center for Central Florida Inc

To create housing solutions, provide compassionate homeless day services, and work alongside partners to inspire community action.

Human Services
8
St Petersburg Free Clinic Inc

With compassion and respect, St. Pete Free Clinic changes lives by providing health care, nutritious food, recovery housing, and education for our neighbors in need.

—
9
BayCare Health System Inc

BAYCARE HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. (BCHS) WILL IMPROVE THE HEALTH OF ALL WE SERVE THROUGH COMMUNITY-OWNED HEALTH CARE SERVICES THAT SET THE STANDARD FOR HIGH-QUALITY, COMPASSIONATE CARE. BCHS is the best place to work, receive and provide care.…

Health
10
Lighthouse Ministries Inc

Lighthouse ministries, inc. is set apart by the spirit of god to communicate the gospel of jesus christ to meet the physical, emotional, and other needs of the poor and at-risk population.

Religion
11
Hungers End Inc

Ending Hunger Providing Hope through our Food Pantry programs and services provided.

Food & Nutrition
12
St John the Evangelist Homeless Shelter Inc

To honor the dignity, restore hope and create lasting change for homeless and those at risk in the green bay area.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc; the most unlike its peers is Computer Mentors Group Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CRISTO REY TAMPA HIGH SCHOOL: $63,500 · OtherCRISTO REY TAMPA HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $46,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHILDREN'S HOME NETWORK: $26,900 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOME NETWORKST LAWRENCE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $21,000 · OtherST LAWRENCE CATHOLIC CHURCHCOMPUTER MENTORS GROUP INC: $9,300 · OtherTHE SOCIETY OF SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL: $8,500 · Other+3 more: $6,016 · OtherMeals on Wheels of Tampa Inc: $28,500 · Food & NutritionMeals on Whee…FEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC: $11,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING AMERI…METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $34,600 · Human ServicesMETROPOLITAN…JUDEO CHRISTIAN HEALTH CLINIC INC: $24,000 · HealthJUDEO CHRIS…LifePath Hospice Inc: $10,000 · HealthLifePath Ho…LOVE INC OF METRO TAMPA INC: $25,200 · ReligionTAMPA BAY WATCH INC: $6,500 · Environment
Other$181,716Food & Nutrition$39,500Human Services$34,600Health$34,000Religion$25,200Environment$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $34,600 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Tampa Inc: $28,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLOVE INC OF METRO TAMPA INC: $25,200 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetJUDEO CHRISTIAN HEALTH CLINIC INC: $24,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC: $11,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLifePath Hospice Inc: $10,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPUTER MENTORS GROUP INC: $9,300 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTAMPA BAY WATCH INC: $6,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY CAFE INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SPRING OF TAMPA BAY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Meals on Wheels of Tampa Inc ↗
  • Who funds LOVE INC OF METRO TAMPA INC ↗
  • Who funds JUDEO CHRISTIAN HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds LifePath Hospice Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMPUTER MENTORS GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds TAMPA BAY WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY CAFE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SPRING OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Spurlino FoundationFL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Spurlino Foundation · Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · New York Yankees Tampa Foundation Inc · Clark Family Fund Inc · Jacarlene Foundation · Rays Baseball Foundation Inc · Vinik Family Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Verizon Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Walter S Pierce Foundation Inc Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Walter S Pierce Foundation Inc Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • The Spring of Tampa Bay Inc: 33% of income from government
  • Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Ministries Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Walter S Pierce Foundation Inc Inc?

Find your warmest path to Walter S Pierce Foundation Inc Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Walter S Pierce’s filings →

More from the funding graph