Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Walter F & Alice Gorham Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$136k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
0169% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$272kEducation$199kHealth$149kInternational$83kEmployment$40kHuman Services$6kPhilanthropy$6kFood & Nutrition$4kCivil Rights$3kOther$346k
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $100k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$30,000
BARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY$30,000
FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$20,000
BREAKTHROUGH TI D$10,000
JEWISH HOME FOUNDATION$10,000
NATIONAL TAY-SACHS & ALLIED DISEASES ASSOCIATION INC$7,500
YESHIVA OF CENTRAL QUEENS$5,000
ENGLEWOOD HEALTH FOUNDATION$5,000
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$4,000
SMITH SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORK$3,000
EMILY'S ENTOURAGE$2,500
JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE BERKSHIRES$2,500
NEW NEIGHBORS PARTNERSHIP$2,000
THEATER DEVELOPMENT FUND$2,000
CASA OF MORRIS & SUSSEX COUNTY$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NEW NEIGHBORS PARTNERSHIP: $2k → 17%NEW NEIGHBORS PARTNERSHIP: $2k → 17%NEW NEIGHBORS PARTNERSHIP: $2k → 17%NEW NEIGHBORS PARTNERSHIP: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MO
MD

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.0M · 25 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.

25 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
8

Total granted

$1.0M
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+30%

Still filing today

60%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureCivil RightsInternationalEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $254k · revenue +38%
  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    7× · 2019–2025 · $83k · revenue +115%
  • BS
    BARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $73k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • IH
    ISRAEL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue +114%
  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH TI D
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • JW
    JEFFREY WACKS MEMORIAL FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
3
The Broad Institute Inc

The mission of the broad institute is to propel progress in biomedicine, through research aimed at the understanding and treatment of disease and the dissemination of scientific knowledge to the scientific community to benefit the public.…

Health
4
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
5
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
6
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

7
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
8
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

9
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

10
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
11
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Theatre Development Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
17/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH HOME FOUNDATION — $95,000 · OtherJEWISH HOME FOUNDATIONHADASSAH HEBREW UNIVERSTY MEDICAL CENTER — $55,000 · OtherHADASSAH HEBREW UNIVERSTY MEDICAL CE…MAYO PERFORMING ARTS CENTER — $43,300 · OtherMAYO PERFORMING ARTS CENTERDAMON RUNYAN CANCER CENTER — $35,000 · OtherDAMON RUNYAN CANCER CENTERENGLEWOOD HEALTH FOUNDATION — $25,000 · OtherENGLEWOOD HEALTH FOUNDATIONRUTGERS UNIVERSITY — $22,500 · OtherRUTGERS UNIVERSITYSMITH SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORK — $18,500 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MEDICAL CENTER — $15,000 · Other+8 more — $48,800 · Other+8 moreBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $253,500 · Arts & CultureBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA I…THEATRE DEVELOPMENT FUND INC — $16,500 · Arts & CultureTHEATRE DEVELOPMENT FUND IN…+1 more — $2,000 · Arts & CultureBARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY INC — $73,400 · EducationBARRINGTON STAGE COM…YESHIVA OF CENTRAL QUEENS — $72,500 · EducationYESHIVA OF CENTRAL Q…WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $30,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSIT…RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $17,000 · EducationRUTGERS UNIVERSITY F…+2 more — $6,000 · EducationNATIONAL TAY-SACHS & ALLIED DISEASES ASS — $55,000 · HealthNATIONAL TAY-SA…BREAKTHROUGH T1D — $40,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1…ISRAEL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 · HealthISRAEL HEALTHCA…Cystic Fibrosis Research Fund Inc — $20,000 · HealthCystic Fibrosis…+2 more — $3,500 · HealthFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $82,500 · InternationalMDRC — $40,000 · EmploymentNEW NEIGHBORS PARTNERSHIP ASSOCIATION — $6,000 · Human Services
Other$358,100Arts & Culture$272,000Education$198,900Health$148,500International$82,500Employment$40,000Human Services$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $253,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $82,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY INC — $73,400 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetYESHIVA OF CENTRAL QUEENS — $72,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL TAY-SACHS & ALLIED DISEASES ASS — $55,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMDRC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCystic Fibrosis Research Fund Inc — $20,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $17,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHEATRE DEVELOPMENT FUND INC — $16,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNEW NEIGHBORS PARTNERSHIP ASSOCIATION — $6,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF THE BERKSHIRES — $5,800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBERKSHIRES BOUNTY INC — $4,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSaint Elizabeth University — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF MORRIS AND SUSSEX COUNTIES INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDREW UNIVERSITY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY OF ILLUSTRATORS INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
  • Who funds BARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY INC
  • Who funds YESHIVA OF CENTRAL QUEENS
  • Who funds NATIONAL TAY-SACHS & ALLIED DISEASES ASS
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D
  • Who funds MDRC
  • Who funds ISRAEL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Cystic Fibrosis Research Fund Inc
  • Who funds RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THEATRE DEVELOPMENT FUND INC
  • Who funds NEW NEIGHBORS PARTNERSHIP ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE BERKSHIRES
  • Who funds BERKSHIRES BOUNTY INC
  • Who funds Saint Elizabeth University
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
  • Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF MORRIS AND SUSSEX COUNTIES INC
  • Who funds DREW UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF ILLUSTRATORS INC
  • Who funds THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY15.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Walter F & Alice Gorham Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
  • Saint Elizabeth University2% of income from government
  • Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc0% of income from government
  • Drew University0% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Walter F & Alice Gorham Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Walter F & Alice Gorham Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph