Skip to content
Walter & Jessie Francisco Char Fnd Xxxxx8003 at a glance

· Private foundation

Walter & Jessie Francisco Char Fnd Xxxxx8003

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$39k
Granted FY2026still arriving
8
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$109kYouth Development$56kArts & Culture$47kHealth$34kEducation$25kFood & Nutrition$14kHousing & Shelter$5kInternational$2k
02FY2026 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$689k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MILTON AREA YOUTH CENTER$6,500
JANESVILLE PERFORMING ARTS$5,618
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF$5,000
SALVATION ARMY$5,000
BELOITT COLLEGE$5,000
JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER$5,000
PREVENT BLINDNESS WISCONSIN$4,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–26, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER: $8k → 10%JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER: $6k → 10%JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER: $5k → 10%JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER: $5k → 10%JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER: $5k → 10%JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$316k · 10 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2026, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
3

Total granted

$316k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+65%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthInternationalEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JP
    JANESVILLE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC
    8× · 2018–2026 · $47k · revenue +106%
  • JC
    JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER INC
    6× · 2019–2026 · $34k · revenue +35%
  • BELOIT COLLEGE
    6× · 2021–2026 · $30k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • BH
    BELOIT HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue -29%
  • HO
    HEALTHNET OF ROCK COUNTY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +65%
  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER BELOIT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +87%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Board of Jewish Education

To provide early childhood and jewish education to the community.

Education
2
Milwaukee Institute of Art & Design Inc

The milwaukee institute of art and design's mission is to ignite curious minds through art, design and service. we value courage to seek our own path, integrity to pursue our lives and work with meaning, kindness to thoughtfully engage…

—
3
Wisconsin Nurses Association Incorporated

The wisconsin nurses association advocates for policies that positively impact the nursing workforce. the association also supports workplace standards that promoted safe patient and nursing care.the association advocated for full practice…

—
4
The Greater Beloit Economic Development Corporation

The mission of the greater beloit economic development corporation ("corporation") is to foster investment and job growth in the economy thereby improving the quality of life, educational attainment, housing availability and prosperity for…

Community Improvement
5
Wisconsin Broadcasters Association Foundation Inc

The wisconsin broadcasters association foundation contribution to broadcasting in wisconsin encompasses a strategic, long term vision for enhancing, promoting and supporting the broadcast industry by encouraging the preservation of…

Arts & Culture
6
Group Health Cooperative of South Central Wi

Mission: we partner with members and the communities we serve to maximize health and well-being. (continued on schedule o)

Health
7
Johnson County Family Ymca

The johnson county ymca is a charitable, community service organization that includes men, women, and children of all ages, abilities, incomes, races, and religions. we are dedicated to building strong kids, strong families, and strong…

Recreation & Sports
8
Westconsin Credit Union

The organization is a cooperative, nonprofit corporation, incorporated under wisconsin state law to encourage thrift among its members, create a source of credit at a fair and reasonable cost, and provide an opportunity for its members to…

—
9
Wausau Child Care Inc

The mission of wausau child care inc. is to strengthen child development, families and the community by providing access to safe, high quality early learning for children.

Human Services
10
Stateline Family Ymca of Beloit

We put christian principles into practice through programs that build a healthy spirit, mind and body for all. at the ymca, strengthening community is our cause. every day, we work sideby-side with our neighbors to make sure that everyone,…

Human Services
11
Junior Achievement of Western Pennsylvania Inc

Junior achievement's mission is to inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy. junior achievement teaches students in grades k-12 how to manage money, how to prepare for a career or college, and how to run a business.…

International
12
United Way of Dane County Inc

Unite the community to achieve measurable results that change lives.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of Greater Beloit Inc; the most unlike its peers is Janesville Community Day Care Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALVATION ARMY: $67,570 · OtherSALVATION ARMYMILTON AREA YOUTH CENTER INC: $57,500 · OtherMILTON AREA YOUTH CENTER INCPrevent Blindness Wisconsin: $33,000 · OtherPrevent Blindness WisconsinYMCA OF NORTHERN ROCK COUNTY INC: $17,750 · OtherYMCA OF NORTHERN ROCK COUNTY INCBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF: $10,000 · Other+1 more: $5,000 · OtherJANESVILLE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $47,368 · Arts & CultureJANESVILLE PERFO…JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER INC: $33,721 · Human ServicesJANESVILLE CO…FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER BELOIT INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMIS…BELOIT COLLEGE: $30,000 · EducationBELOIT COL…SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI: $14,100 · Food & NutritionHEALTHNET OF ROCK COUNTY INC: $5,000 · HealthJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC: $4,500 · International
Other$190,820Arts & Culture$47,368Human Services$38,721Education$30,000Food & Nutrition$14,100Health$5,000International$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMILTON AREA YOUTH CENTER INC: $57,500 over 8y, 18% of budgetJANESVILLE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $47,368 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetJANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER INC: $33,721 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetPrevent Blindness Wisconsin: $33,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetBELOIT COLLEGE: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA OF NORTHERN ROCK COUNTY INC: $17,750 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI: $14,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBELOIT HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHEALTHNET OF ROCK COUNTY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Allen Foundation TrustBaird Foundation IncDorothy a Ashcraft Ch…George K Tallman Trus…Claremont S Jackman F…Community Foundation …Alliant Energy Founda…American Endowment Fo…Amazonsmile Foundation
Allen Foundation TrustWI15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Allen Foundation Trust · Baird Foundation Inc · Dorothy a Ashcraft Charitable Xxxxx7008 · George K Tallman Trust Xxxxx0004 · Claremont S Jackman Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Community Foundation of Southern Wisconsin Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Walter & Jessie Francisco Char Fnd Xxxxx8003 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Walter & Jessie Francisco Char Fnd Xxxxx8003. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Walter & Jessie Francisco Char Fnd Xxxxx8003’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home