· Private foundation
Wallace Landry Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k31 grants · $85k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $75k
- $250k+1 grant · $300k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MOUNT CARMEL ACADEMY | $300,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| SEASIDE SCHOOL FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| IMMACULATE CONCEPTION JESUIT CHURCH | $10,000 |
| BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE | $10,000 |
| ST MICAHEL SPECIAL SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES | $5,000 |
| ST LILLIAN'S ACADEMY | $5,000 |
| CATHEDERAL OF CHRIST THE KING | $5,000 |
| ST DOMINIC PARISH | $5,000 |
| ST ANDREW'S VILLAGE | $5,000 |
| TEAM GLEASON | $5,000 |
| USA WRESTLING | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $93k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +83% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.
45 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TGTEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $120k · revenue +308%
- SAST ANDREW'S VILLAGE INC7× · 2018–2024 · $110k · revenue +274% · 68% of their budget
- NBNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC4× · 2018–2021 · $75k · revenue +32%
Funded once
- LCLA CHILDREN MUSEUMone grant, 2017 · $75k
- CBCHRISTIAN BROTHER SCHOOLone grant, 2017 · $35k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Luke's house provides medical and spiritual hope, health, and healing to greater new orleans residents, creates patient-centered experiences for students, and connects patients to long-term healthcare solutions.
To assist in improving healthcare in Beauregard Parish, Louisiana.
People matter. forward together new orleans' mission is to move the city forward in an intentional way, focusing on our people: their goals, needs, and aspirations.
The mission of the foundation is to inspire donors to invest in the lsu health sciences center - new orleans ("hsc-no") and its future, to properly steward those contributions, and to help meet the ever evolving needs of the lsuhsc-no by…
Using direct representation and advocacy, we fight to keep children out of the justice system so that they can thrive in their homes and communities.
To fight cancer through research, education, and service to patience and their families.
The new orleans architecture foundation supports and collaborates with aia new orleans on education and advocacy activities that enhance public appreciation of architecture and design as vital community assets that enrich the quality of…
Heroes of New Orleans is a grassroot 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization committed to inspiring and empowering youth and families. Our mission is to elevate underprivileged youth and families who face poverty or its risks, through a…
Dedicated to empowering food on entrepreneurs on their journey to scale by building bridges to education, collaboration, and capital.
Rebuilding together new orleans helps low to moderate income greater new orleans area homeowners repair and rehabilitate their homes. rtno stabilizes and revitalizes neighborhoods and improves health and safety in our communities.
To grant wishes to and otherwise act for the benefit of children suffering from terminal or life theatening illness or disease.
To provide quality, comprehensive, compassionate, and culturally appropriate primary and preventive healthcare services to residents in medically underserved North Louisiana.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc and the most unlike its peers is Palace Theatre Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 97 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST ANDREW'S VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds THE HARRY TOMPSON CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ST LILLIAN ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds NOLA Tree Project ↗
- Who funds THE SEASIDE SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LAKEVIEW SHEPHERD CENTER ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
- Who funds WHAT YOU GIVE WILL GROW ↗
- Who funds MARKETUMBRELLAORG ↗
- Who funds HOPE IGNITES NEW ORLEANS ↗
- Who funds RECONCILE NEW ORLEANS INC ↗
- Who funds ASAP FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Greater New Orleans Foundation · J Edgar Monroe Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Baptist Community Ministries · Angel Wings Foundation · The Azby Fund · The Emeril Lagasse Foundation · Oscar J Tolmas Charitable Trust · Forekids Foundations Inc Dba Zurich Classic of New Orleans · Patrick F Taylor Foundation · Goldring Family Foundation · Salmen Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wallace Landry Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.