· Private foundation
Angel Wings Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k38 grants · $107k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $127k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MAGNOLIA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC | $41,000 |
| RAINTREE CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVIC | $30,000 |
| THE MIRACLE LEAGUE OF GNO | $25,000 |
| THE GOOD SHEPHERD SCHOOL | $16,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| ST MICHAEL'S SPECIAL SCHOOL | $7,000 |
| CANCER CRUSADERS | $6,850 |
| NOBA | $5,000 |
| UIS FUNDS LLC - HOGS FOR THE CAUSE | $5,000 |
| NOEL NOLA ED LEAGUE - CONST INDUSTR | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| LADIES LEUKEMIA LEAGUE | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| CAMP PELICAN-LA PULMONARY DISEASE C | $5,000 |
| MIRACLE MANCHESTER co RICHARD NEWMA | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $212k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
49 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMAGNOLIA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC6× · 2020–2025 · $195k · revenue +20%
- RSRAINTREE SERVICES INC6× · 2020–2025 · $184k · revenue +62%
- HIHOPE IGNITES NEW ORLEANS5× · 2020–2025 · $39k · revenue +27%
Funded once
- GFGALATOIRE FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -51%
- GGGSS GOOD SHEPHERD SCHOOLone grant, 2024 · $10k
- JAJUSTICE ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER OF NOone grant, 2022 · $8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide for the material and spiritual needs of the homeless, hungry, and displaced of Northeast Louisiana, and to facilitate and assist them in getting out of the cycle of poverty.
To empower adults and children living in louisiana who have mental, physical, behavioral, and other challenges to improve the quality of their lives and to live as independently as possible in their communities by facilitating personal…
To provide love, care, and a positive christian witness for children and families in need.
Provide hospice care to qualified individuals and to inform the general public regarding the definition and role of hospice care.
Together Louisiana is a network of faith and community institutions that works to strengthen local leadership and support practical solutions to everyday challenges. Its mission focuses on helping communities work together across race…
Neighborhood housing services of new orleans, inc. revitalizes communities by increasing the number of homeowners and transforming vacant or substandard properties into sustainable homeownership. we improve quality of life through informed…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Inc and the most unlike its peers is We Lift You Up. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 109 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MAGNOLIA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds RAINTREE SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD NATIVITY MISSION SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE IGNITES NEW ORLEANS ↗
- Who funds CANCER CRUSADERS INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds LADIES LEUKEMIA LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds JEFFERSON PERFORMING ARTS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA ↗
- Who funds NEW ORLEANS MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds Safe Harbor Inc ↗
- Who funds NAMI NEW ORLEANS INC ↗
- Who funds GALATOIRE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ONE HEART NOLA INC ↗
- Who funds The Louisiana Museum Foundation ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL CONNECTIONS ↗
- Who funds WE LIFT YOU UP ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Greater New Orleans Foundation · J Edgar Monroe Foundation · Baptist Community Ministries · Shell USA Company Foundation · Goldring Family Foundation · Louise H Moffett Family Foundation · Gayle and Tom Benson Charitable Foundation · Eugenie & Joseph Jones Family Foundation · The Almar Foundationdba The Alden and Margaret Laborde Foundation · Salutare Deum Foundation · Lauricella Land Company Foundation · Oscar J Tolmas Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Angel Wings Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Angel Wings Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Angel Wings Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.