· Private foundation
Wallace Genetic Foundation Inc
Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 97 grants below total $8,275,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $10,500,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,225,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2017
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k35 grants · $925k
- $50k–250k52 grants · $4.1M
- $250k+9 grants · $3.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Earthjustice | $500,000 |
| Environmental Defense Fund | $500,000 |
| Iowa State University Foundation | $400,000 |
| New Venture Fund | $400,000 |
| New Venture Fund | $350,000 |
| New Venture Fund | $300,000 |
| Duke School of Medicine | $250,000 |
| Grand Canyon Trust | $250,000 |
| Nicholas School of the Environment/Duke University | $250,000 |
| Heart to Heart International | $200,000 |
| Earthjustice | $200,000 |
| Santa Fe Community Foundation | $150,000 |
| Conservation Fund | $150,000 |
| The Environmental Film Festival | $140,000 |
| U.S. Water Partnership | $125,000 |
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.
WEF's mission is inspiring the water community in pursuit of human and environmental well-being. WEF is a global environmental leader committed to water quality education and technical best practices. WEF connects water professionals;…
To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is World Food Prize Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
- Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE GRAND CANYON TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC ↗
- Who funds HEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds US WATER PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CERES INC ↗
- Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds SIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
- Who funds WATER ENGINEERS FOR THE AMERICAS ↗
- Who funds WATERLINES ↗
- Who funds H2O FOR LIFE ↗
- Who funds Nature Forward ↗
- Who funds Global Health Council ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds SKYTRUTH ↗
- Who funds Meridian Institute ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHAWK ↗
- Who funds The End Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds JACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds The George Washington University ↗
- Who funds GREEN SCIENCE POLICY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds MILLENNIUM WATER ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds PERSEPHONE PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Wallace Genetic Foundation II Inc · Gates Foundation · Cornell Douglas Foundation Inc · The Rockefeller Foundation · Farvue Foundation Inc · Resources Legacy Fund · The Keith Campbell Foundation for the Environment Inc · Walton Family Foundation Inc · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Wallace Genetic Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Wallace Genetic Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.