How much did WALKLING MEMORIAL TRUST grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 85% of WALKLING MEMORIAL TRUST’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

olympic medicalport angelespeninsula

2019

peninsula

2020

arts

2021

angeles foodolympic peninsulafood bankport angeles

2022

port angeles

2023

concerned citizensvolunteer hospicehospice clallamsequim foodfood bank

2024

arts

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k9 grants · $30k
$10k–50k2 grants · $53k

$4,849

Median grant

States reached

$3.1M

Total assets

Largest grants

VARIOUS STUDENTS$42,500
MANNA$10,000
PORT ANGELES FOOD BANK$5,000
CLALLAM PROMISE SCHOLARSHIP$5,000
OLYMPIC THEATRE ARTS$5,000
GHOSTLIGHT PRODUCTIONS$4,849
SERENITY HOUSE$4,284
FELLOWSHIP$2,000
OLYMPIC PENINSULA EXTD NEED HOUSING$2,000
FIRST STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER$1,000
RAINFOREST COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS$500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 12%. 89% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$655k · 19 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +109% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$655k

$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+109%

+3%

Still filing today

63%

18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SF
SEQUIM FOOD BANK
4× · 2018–2023 · $18k · revenue +109%
VH
VOLUNTEER HOSPICE OF CLALLAM COUNTY
3× · 2020–2023 · $17k · revenue +39%
PA
PORT ANGELES FOOD BANK
3× · 2019–2024 · $16k · revenue +1241%

Funded once

PC
PENINSUAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION
one grant, 2018 · $8k
NO
NORTH OLYMPIC REG VETERAN HOUSING
one grant, 2021 · $7k
CF
CLALLAM FIRE RESCUE
one grant, 2023 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Nourish Pierce County

To provide food to individuals in need with compassion, dignity and respect. No one needing assistance is turned away.

—

The University of Puget Sound

Develop students to sustain intellectual curiosity, active inquiry, & reasoned independence

Education

Olympia Community Solar

To steward an equitable and accessible transition to clean energy through community solar education, policy, and project development.

Environment

Pierce County Project Access

To improve the health of individuals, families and communities by ensuring pathways to health services for Pierce County residents in need.

Health

Family Promise of Cowlitz County

To help families with children in our community who are situationally homeless achieve sustainable independence through a community based response by providing temporary housing, usually 60-90 days, along with case management.

Human Services

Seattle Children's Healthcare System

The provision of quality health care services to infants, children and adolescents.

Health

Lake Chelan Food Bank

The mission of Lake Chelan Food Bank is to treat each person we serve with dignity and respect and to provide balanced and varied options that give each person the liberty to meet the specific food needs for themsevles and/or their family.

Food & Nutrition

Caring Pregnancy Center of Cowlitz Co

Caring Pregnancy Center exists to educate, equip and empower women to make informed, life-affirming choices.

Health

The Olympia Free Clinic

Volunteer based organization where underserved community members receive health care services and linkages to community resources within a caring and respectful environment at no cost to them.

Health

Pierce County Center for

Our mission is to resolve differences and strengthen relationships in the community with inclusive and equitable dialog.

Crime & Legal

Olympic Peninsula Healthy Community

The Mission of the Olympic Peninsula Healthy Community Coalition is "Forming partnerships and networks that establish healthy choices as the standard in our community."

Health

Peninsula Community Health Services of

Strengthening the community by providing accessible and affordable health care.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Peninsula Behavioral Health and the most unlike its peers is Healthy Families of Clallam County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 5% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/23

the rest of the field

27/492

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

19/21

Grantees still filing

18/21

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$637,971Health$36,597Human Services$27,433Food & Nutrition$15,866Arts & Culture$12,349Animals$7,000Housing & Shelter$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albert Haller FoundationWA35.6× affinity14 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albert Haller Foundation · Seattle Foundation · United Way of Clallam County · First Fed Foundation · Medina Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation WALKLING MEMORIAL TRUST funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: GHOSTLIGHT PRODUCTIONS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~2 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 824241988 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on GHOSTLIGHT PRODUCTIONS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 2 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 4% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Walkling Memorial Trust?

Find your warmest path to Walkling Memorial Trust through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

WALKLING MEMORIAL TRUST

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Walkling Memorial Trust?

More from the funding graph

WALKLING MEMORIAL TRUST

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Walkling Memorial Trust?

More from the funding graph