Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way of Clallam County

Our mission is to strengthen our community by helping people live safe, healthy, and productive lives.

$804k
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$102k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$1.3MYouth Development$998kHuman Services$941kHousing & Shelter$400kCrime & Legal$268kFood & Nutrition$187kRecreation & Sports$95kCommunity Improvement$85kOther$0
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 26 grants below total $744,789 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $804,034 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $59,245 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $353k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $359k
$22,180
Median grant
3
States reached
$7.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Olympic Peninsula YMCA$101,919
Forks Community Food Bank$52,672
Mariposa House$51,947
St Andrews Place$51,479
Clallam Mosaic$51,047
Society of St Vincent de Paul$50,013
Peninsula Behavior Health$37,636
Olympic Community Action Programs$36,263
First Step Family Support Center$31,960
Serenity House of Clallam County$31,935
Lutheran Community Services NW$25,223
Concerned Citizens$22,342
Boys & Girls Clubs of the Olympic Peninsula$22,180
Healthy Families of Clallam County$20,887
Habitat for Humanity of Clallam County$20,085
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%VOLUNTEER CHORE SERVICES: $16k → 9%VOLUNTEER CHORE SERVICES: $15k → 9%CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WW: $13k → 9%CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WW: $11k → 9%Concerned Citizens: $22k → 11%Lutheran Community Services NW: $25k → 9%OLYMPIC PENINSULA YMCA: $102k → 12%CONCERNED CITIZENS: $13k → 11%THE ANSWER FOR YOUTH: $100k → 12%CLALLAM RESILIENCE PROJECT: $95k → 12%CONCERNED CITIZENS: $11k → 11%CONCERNED CITIZENS: $11k → 11%Clallam Mosaic: $51k → 12%FIRST STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CTR: $37k → 12%FIRST STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CTR: $33k → 12%First Step Family Support Center: $32k → 12%LUTHERAN COMMUNITY SERVICE: $22k → 12%Olympic Community Action Programs: $36k → 11%OLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS: $20k → 11%OLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS: $14k → 11%OLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS: $13k → 11%OLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS: $12k → 11%OLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS: $11k → 11%OLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS: $10k → 11%FIRST STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CTR: $19k → 12%FIRST STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CTR: $19k → 12%FIRST STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CTR: $17k → 12%FIRST STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CTR: $17k → 12%OLYMPIC PENINSULA YMCA: $14k → 12%LUTHERAN COMMUNITY SERVICE: $14k → 12%THE ANSWER FOR YOUTH: $13k → 12%Olympic Peninsula YMCA: $102k → 12%CLALLAM MOSIAC: $54k → 12%OLYMPIC PENINSULA YMCA: $12k → 12%Society of St Vincent de Paul: $50k → 12%OLYMPIC PENINSULA YMCA: $11k → 12%FIRST STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CTR: $11k → 12%CLALLAM MOSIAC: $18k → 12%LUTHERAN COMMUNITY SERVICE: $11k → 12%LUTHERAN COMMUNITY SERVICE: $11k → 12%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $16k → 12%OLYMPIC PENINSULA YMCA: $11k → 12%CLALLAM MOSIAC: $15k → 12%CLALLAM MOSIAC: $15k → 12%CLALLAM MOSIAC: $14k → 12%CLALLAM MOSIAC: $13k → 12%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $12k → 12%CLALLAM MOSIAC: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.2M · 28 repeat orgs$169k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +78% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.

28 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
5

Total granted

$4.2M
$84k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
-6%

Still filing today

89%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $84k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE OLYMPIC PENINSULA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $639k · revenue +31%
  • PB
    PENINSULA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
    8× · 2017–2024 · $380k · revenue +184%
  • OP
    OLYMPIC PENINSULA YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSN
    8× · 2017–2024 · $362k · revenue +121%

Funded once

  • SH
    SEQUIM HEALTH & HOUSING COLLABORATI
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • NO
    NORTH OLYMPIC HEALTHCARE NETWORKgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +64%
  • PA
    PORT ANGELES FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -6%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Peninsula Behavioral Health Services Inc

The organization operates primarily on the Southern Kenai Peninsula and its operations include the following:Community Mental Health - Counseling, evaluation, consultation and crisis mental health services for Adults and…

Health
2
Peninsula Community Health Services of Alaska

Strengthening the community by providing accessible and affordable health care.

Health
3
Snohomish County Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

To provide food, shelter, clothing and other services to people in need in our community.

Human Services
4
Snoqualmie Valley Food Bank

Our mission is to provide food and key resources to help our neighbors and community thrive. we lead the effort to feed, educated and advocate ending hunger in the snoqualmie valley and beyond.

Food & Nutrition
5
Columbia Wellness

CARE. Commitment to improving quality of life. Advocacy for mental health and overall well-being. Response to community needs. Effective treatment with measurable outcomes.

—
6
Chelan Valley Hope

Chelan Valley Hope is a gross-roots local social services agency 'hub' for compassionate connections and resources since 2009. We empower people to improve their own lives by giving them a hand up; not just a hand-out. We do this by…

Human Services
7
Columbia Pacific Food Bank

Columbia pacific food bank is the regional food distribution center for columbia county, oregon and local food pantry for the community of saint helens.

Food & Nutrition
8
Snohomish Community Food Bank

To provide food and services in a caring and dignified manner to neighbors in need

—
9
Columbia River Mental Health Services

Columbia river mental health services is a full service mental health agency offering a wide spectrum of behavioral health services to children and adults of clark county, washington.

Health
10
United Way of Snohomish County

United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.

Philanthropy
11
Partners Inland Northwest

Partners inland northwest is the sole source of comprehensive community and social services in spokane valley, serving low income and disadvantaged residents between the city of spokane and the idaho border.

Human Services
12
Project Access Northwest

Project Access Northwest provides low-income families access to medical, dental and Behavioral Health care so they can live a healthier and more productive life.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Peninsula Behavioral Health and the most unlike its peers is Quillayute Valley School District Scholarship Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyOlympic Peninsula Community…Waterfront Community CentersCommunity Service ClubsClallam County Community Se…Community Recreation & Yout…Jefferson County Community …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%0%<5yr13%3%5–10yr21%11%10–20yr20%29%20–35yr13%37%35–55yr16%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%0%<5yr13%1%5–10yr21%6%10–20yr20%24%20–35yr13%49%35–55yr16%20%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/37
the rest of the field
7%
58/864

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/34
Grantees still filing
24/34
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OLYMPIC PENINSULA YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSN — $362,149 · Human ServicesOLYMPIC PENINSULA YOUNG MENS CHRI…CLALLAM MOSAIC — $189,118 · Human ServicesCLALLAM MOSAICFIRST STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER — $184,514 · Human ServicesFIRST STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CENTEROLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS — $121,303 · Human ServicesOLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMSANSWER FOR YOUTH — $113,200 · Human ServicesANSWER FOR YOUTHCONCERNED CITIZENS — $84,448 · Human ServicesCONCERNED CITIZENSLutheran Community Services Northwest — $82,214 · Human ServicesLutheran Community Services North…CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON — $70,834 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WE…SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ST JOSEPH CONFERENCE SEQUIM — $50,013 · Human ServicesNATIONAL COUNCIL OF THE US SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL INC — $47,827 · Human Services+1 more — $7,866 · Human ServicesPENINSULA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $380,201 · HealthPENINSULA BEHAVIORAL HEALT…VOLUNTEER HOSPICE OF CLALLAM COUNTY — $322,738 · HealthVOLUNTEER HOSPICE OF CLALL…HEALTHY FAMILIES OF CLALLAM COUNTY — $207,083 · HealthHEALTHY FAMILIES OF CLALLA…DUNGENESS VALLEY HEALTH & WELLNESS CLINIC — $64,984 · HealthDUNGENESS VALLEY HEALTH & …Olympic Peninsula Community Clinic — $35,263 · Health+1 more — $10,000 · HealthSt Andrews Retirement Community — $226,246 · OtherSt Andrews Retiremen…FORKS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $170,929 · OtherFORKS COMMUNITY FOOD…CLALLAM-JEFFERSON COUNTY PRO BONO LAWYERS — $99,489 · OtherCLALLAM-JEFFERSON CO…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CLALLAM COUNTY — $85,586 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY…AMERICAN RED CROSS - OPC — $53,869 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS -…SEQUIM HEALTH & HOUSING COLLABORATI — $50,000 · OtherSEQUIM HEALTH & HOUS…WEST END YOUTH & COMMUNITY CLUB — $48,660 · OtherWEST END YOUTH & COM…PENINSULA COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $27,150 · Other+6 more — $50,697 · Other+6 moreTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE OLYMPIC PENINSULA — $638,598 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BOYS & GIRLS C…CAMP BEAUSITE NORTHWEST — $95,287 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP BEAUSITE NORT…SERENITY HOUSE OF CLALLAM COUNTY — $157,730 · Housing & ShelterNORTH OLYMPIC REGIONAL VETERANS HOUSING NETWORK — $107,174 · Housing & ShelterFORKS ABUSE PROGRAM — $159,409 · Crime & LegalPENINSULA DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER — $61,248 · Crime & LegalPARENTING MATTERS FOUNDATION — $43,763 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$1,313,486Health$1,020,269Other$812,626Youth Development$733,885Housing & Shelter$264,904Crime & Legal$220,657Arts & Culture$43,763

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE OLYMPIC PENINSULA — $638,598 over 8y, 9.0% of budgetPENINSULA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $380,201 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetOLYMPIC PENINSULA YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSN — $362,149 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetVOLUNTEER HOSPICE OF CLALLAM COUNTY — $322,738 over 4y, 34% of budgetSt Andrews Retirement Community — $226,246 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetHEALTHY FAMILIES OF CLALLAM COUNTY — $207,083 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetCLALLAM MOSAIC — $189,118 over 8y, 26% of budgetFIRST STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER — $184,514 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetFORKS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $170,929 over 8y, 29% of budgetFORKS ABUSE PROGRAM — $159,409 over 8y, 5.4% of budgetSERENITY HOUSE OF CLALLAM COUNTY — $157,730 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetOLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS — $121,303 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetANSWER FOR YOUTH — $113,200 over 2y, 38% of budgetNORTH OLYMPIC REGIONAL VETERANS HOUSING NETWORK — $107,174 over 5y, 11% of budgetCLALLAM-JEFFERSON COUNTY PRO BONO LAWYERS — $99,489 over 8y, 10% of budgetCAMP BEAUSITE NORTHWEST — $95,287 over 7y, 9.9% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CLALLAM COUNTY — $85,586 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetCONCERNED CITIZENS — $84,448 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetLutheran Community Services Northwest — $82,214 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON — $70,834 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDUNGENESS VALLEY HEALTH & WELLNESS CLINIC — $64,984 over 6y, 4.5% of budgetPENINSULA DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER — $61,248 over 6y, 11% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ST JOSEPH CONFERENCE SEQUIM — $50,013 over 1y, 24% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF THE US SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL INC — $47,827 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPARENTING MATTERS FOUNDATION — $43,763 over 4y, 23% of budgetOlympic Peninsula Community Clinic — $35,263 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetPENINSULA COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $27,150 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetOLYMPIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $10,510 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNORTH OLYMPIC HEALTHCARE NETWORK — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPORT ANGELES FOOD BANK — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION — $8,930 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $7,866 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQUILLAYUTE VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC — $7,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetSequim Food Bank — $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albert Haller Foundat…First Fed FoundationSeattle FoundationWalkling Memorial Tru…Medina FoundationFood LifelineJefferson Community F…Northwest Harvest EmmSchool's Out Washingt…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
Albert Haller FoundationWA53.9× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albert Haller Foundation · First Fed Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Walkling Memorial Trust · Medina Foundation · Food Lifeline · Jefferson Community Foundation · Northwest Harvest Emm · School's Out Washington · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Way of Clallam County funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $35k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home