Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Wakefield Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$65k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$152kEducation$88kArts & Culture$61kAnimals$53kRecreation & Sports$31kHousing & Shelter$20kHuman Services$7kEnvironment$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $41k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$809k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
POLK COUNTY K9 ASSOCIATION$16,000
HOOFBEATS THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC$15,000
GUILD$10,000
ALLINA HEALTH FOUNDATION$7,500
ANIMAL HUMANE SOCIETY$5,000
POLK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$3,000
NATURAL BRIDGE APPALACHIAN TRAIL CLUB$3,000
WE CAN RIDE INC$2,500
FRIENDS OF THE CHESSIE TRAIL$2,000
BLAKE SCHOOL$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%8 TO A LAMP: $2k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$395k · 20 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
8

Total granted

$395k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+49%

Still filing today

55%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationArts & CultureAnimalsRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • G
    Guild
    9× · 2017–2025 · $56k · revenue +18%
  • AH
    Animal Humane Society
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +28%
  • HT
    HOOFBEATS THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $28k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • NF
    New Freedom Farm Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue -45%
  • SM
    ST MARTINS BY-THE-LAKE CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
  • RA
    ROCKBRIDGE AREA FREE CLINIC INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +49%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Humane Society Veterinary Centers Pc

Provide wellness and spay/neuter services at reduced cost for people in need.

Community Improvement
2
United Hospital District

At United Hospital District, we exist to provide and promote appropriate health care services to the communities we serve, doing so in a safe and healing environment which supports our patient-centered care philosophy.

Health
3
Glencoe Regional Health Services

Glencoe regional health services exists to improve every life by offering high-quality, safe, and accessible healthcare. we are dedicated to strengthening healthcare by connecting our communities, enhancing the patient experience,…

Health
4
Lakewood Health System

The mission of lakewood health system is to provide quality, personalized healthcare for a lifetime.

Health
5
Winona Health Services

To inspire, recognize, and empower the caregiver in all of us.

Health
6
Minnesota Hospital Association

Advance the health of individuals and communities through leadership, advocacy and collaboration on behalf of minnesota hospitals and health systems. vision: minnesotans are healthy and have access to the right care at the right time in…

Community Improvement
7
Kittson Memorial Hospital

Caring for friends and neighbors, kittson memorial healthcare center provides and cooperates with others to ensure that residents have access to services necessary to maintain their health and well-being.

Health
8
Ely-Bloomenson Community Hospital

Ely-bloomenson community hospital is committed to caring for and enhancing the health and well-being of the community it serves.

Health
9
Osmond General Hospital

Osmond general hospital is committed to providing patient centered, high-quality healthcare in a cost effective and safe manner.

10
The Visiting Nurse Health Services

Delivering community-based care that provides peace of mind, quality of life and independence.

Health
11
Carver Scott County Humane Society

Connecting animals in need with people who care.

Animals
12
Exceptional Equestrians of the Missouri Valley Inc

Provide recreational and therapeutic riding on horseback for about 120 people with disabilities

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hoofbeats Therapeutic Riding Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Polk County Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPet Rescue and AdoptionCharter Schools and Early C…Firefighter Pension Associa…Disability & Recovery Servi…Local Service Club Foundati…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%5%<5yr12%14%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr17%38%20–35yr16%29%35–55yr18%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%1%<5yr12%14%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr17%56%20–35yr16%11%35–55yr18%17%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%1/26
the rest of the field
10%
3,828/38,963

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/20
Grantees still filing
12/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Guild — $55,500 · OtherGuildPOLK COUNTY K9 ASSOCIATION INC — $32,000 · OtherPOLK COUNTY K9 ASSOCIATION INCABBOTT NORTHWESTERN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $28,000 · OtherABBOTT NORTHWESTERN HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONTHE ARC GREATER TWIN CITIES — $14,000 · OtherTHE ARC GREATER TWIN CITIESSOUTHWEST VIRGINIA DRESSAGE ASSOCIATION — $13,000 · OtherSOUTHWEST VIRGINIA DRESSAGE ASSOCIATIONPOLK COUNTY K9 ASSOCIATION — $8,000 · OtherCATS UNLIMTED — $8,000 · OtherPOLK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $8,000 · Other+9 more — $30,000 · Other+9 moreORONO FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION — $75,000 · EducationORONO FOUNDATION FOR ED…THE BLAKE SCHOOL — $13,000 · EducationTHE BLAKE SCHOOLHOOFBEATS THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC — $28,000 · HealthHOOFBEATS THERAPEUT…ALLINA HEALTH FOUNDATION — $17,500 · HealthALLINA HEALTH FOUND…HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION — $13,300 · HealthHAZELDEN BETTY FORD…ALWAYS B SMILING INC — $9,750 · HealthALWAYS B SMILING IN…ROCKBRIDGE AREA FREE CLINIC INC — $3,000 · HealthAnimal Humane Society — $45,000 · AnimalsAnimal Human…VIRGINIA HORSE CENTER FOUNDATION — $9,000 · Recreation & SportsPOLK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $6,000 · Arts & CultureALLEGHANY HIGHLANDS ARTS AND CRAFTS CENTER INC — $2,000 · Arts & Culture8 TO A LAMP — $2,000 · Human ServicesGLASGOW VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT — $2,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$196,500Education$88,000Health$71,550Animals$45,000Recreation & Sports$9,000Arts & Culture$8,000Human Services$2,000Public Safety & Disaster$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetORONO FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION — $75,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetGuild — $55,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAnimal Humane Society — $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHOOFBEATS THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC — $28,000 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetABBOTT NORTHWESTERN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $28,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetALLINA HEALTH FOUNDATION — $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC GREATER TWIN CITIES — $14,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION — $13,300 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BLAKE SCHOOL — $13,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetALWAYS B SMILING INC — $9,750 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetVIRGINIA HORSE CENTER FOUNDATION — $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPOLK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $6,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetNew Freedom Farm Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetROCKBRIDGE AREA FREE CLINIC INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget8 TO A LAMP — $2,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetALLEGHANY HIGHLANDS ARTS AND CRAFTS CENTER INC — $2,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetRide With Pride Inc — $2,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetGLASGOW VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT — $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ORONO FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION
  • Who funds Guild
  • Who funds Animal Humane Society
  • Who funds HOOFBEATS THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC
  • Who funds ABBOTT NORTHWESTERN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ALLINA HEALTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE ARC GREATER TWIN CITIES
  • Who funds HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE BLAKE SCHOOL
  • Who funds ALWAYS B SMILING INC
  • Who funds VIRGINIA HORSE CENTER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds POLK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds POLK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds New Freedom Farm Inc
  • Who funds ROCKBRIDGE AREA FREE CLINIC INC
  • Who funds WE CAN RIDE INC
  • Who funds 8 TO A LAMP
  • Who funds ALLEGHANY HIGHLANDS ARTS AND CRAFTS CENTER INC
  • Who funds Ride With Pride Inc
  • Who funds GLASGOW VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN13.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Wakefield Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Wakefield Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Wakefield Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph