Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Wade Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$95k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$932kAnimals$597kReligion$334kEnvironment$100kFood & Nutrition$85kRecreation & Sports$50kPhilanthropy$48kPublic Safety & Disaster$33kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$30,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANIMAL ADOPTION CENTER INC$50,000
K9'S FOR WARRIORS$30,000
BO'S HEAVENLY CLUBHOUSE$10,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TETON VALLEY$5,120
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BO'S HEAVENLY CLUBHOUSE: $10k → 9%THE CENTER FOR PURSUIT: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 20% of Wade Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 93% of the giving stays in WY; read by stated purpose it is 77% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Wade Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 11 repeat orgs$142k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +101% since the first grant, against -29% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
4

Total granted

$2.0M
$102k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+101%
-29%

Still filing today

64%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEnvironmentHuman ServicesEducationHealthFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    TETON SCIENCE SCHOOLS INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $801k · revenue +37%
  • AA
    Animal Adoption Center Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $477k · revenue +101%
  • JH
    Jackson Hole Community School
    4× · 2017–2020 · $131k · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • YP
    YELLOWSTONE PARK FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • TR
    TETON RAPTOR CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -32%
  • FR
    FamilyPoint Resourcesgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +83%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Society of Southern Arizona

To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.

Animals
2
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
3
Idaho Humane Society Inc

The mission of the Idaho Humane Society (IHS) is to advocate for the welfare and responsible care of animals, protect them from neglect and cruelty, and promote humane education, awareness and compassion for all living creatures.

Animals
4
Animal Humane Society Veterinary Centers Pc

Provide wellness and spay/neuter services at reduced cost for people in need.

Community Improvement
5
Houston Pets Alive

Houston Pets Alive!s (HPA!) mission is to save the lives of at-risk companion cats and dogs and find them loving homes.

Animals
6
Animal Humane Society

Animal Humane Society (AHS) established in 1878 and incorporated as a nonprofit charitable organization in 1891 works to engage the hearts, hands, and minds of the community to help animals. AHS's vision is to compassionately and…

Animals
7
Santa Fe Animal Shelter and Humane Society Inc

To support animals, save lives, and spread compassion.

Animals
8
Humane Society of the South Platte Valley Inc

HSSPV's mission is to be a leader in saving lives and serving communities by providing innovative care for animals, finding loving homes and reuniting families.

Animals
9
Humane Society of the Pikes Peak Region

To offer compassionate care to animals, support safe communities, and provide socially conscious sheltering. (continued on schedule o)

Animals
10
Windham County Humane Society

Windham County Humane Society is dedicated to ensuring the safety and well being of animals, as well as enhancing the relationship between individuals and pets through adoption, education, advocacy, compassion and promotion of animal…

Animals
11
Cache Humane Society

Cache Humane Society is committed to rescuing, rehabilitating and rehoming animals in need, reducing pet homelessness through education, advocacy, and affordable veterinary services, and inspiring our community to provide and support…

12
Wisconsin Humane Society

The mission of the Wisconsin Humane Society is to make a difference for animals and the people who love them.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Jackson Hole and the most unlike its peers is Jackson Hole Community School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TETON SCIENCE SCHOOLS INC — $800,600 · EnvironmentTETON SCIENCE SCHOOLS INCYELLOWSTONE FOREVER — $100,000 · EnvironmentYELLOWSTONE FOREVERAnimal Adoption Center Inc — $477,160 · AnimalsAnimal Adoption Center IncCitizens For Animal Protection Inc — $30,000 · AnimalsCitizens For Animal Protecti…K9S FOR WARRIORS INC — $30,000 · AnimalsK9S FOR WARRIORS INC+1 more — $10,000 · AnimalsST JOHN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $334,000 · OtherST JOHN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCHYELLOWSTONE PARK FOUNDATION — $50,000 · OtherYELLOWSTONE PARK FOUNDATIO…TETON RAPTOR CENTER — $50,000 · OtherTETON RAPTOR CENTERTETON COUNTY SEARCH AND RESCUE — $33,306 · OtherTETON COUNTY SEARCH AND RE…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TETON VALLEY INC — $25,120 · OtherLEAD — $17,000 · OtherJackson Hole Community School — $131,000 · EducationHole Food Rescue — $85,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE — $23,000 · PhilanthropyBO WILLIAM HARTWIG FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR PURSUIT — $1,000 · Human ServicesFamilyPoint Resources — $1,000 · Health
Environment$900,600Animals$547,160Other$509,426Education$131,000Food & Nutrition$85,000Philanthropy$23,000Human Services$11,000Health$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTETON SCIENCE SCHOOLS INC — $800,600 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetAnimal Adoption Center Inc — $477,160 over 8y, 14% of budgetJackson Hole Community School — $131,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetYELLOWSTONE FOREVER — $100,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetHole Food Rescue — $85,000 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetTETON RAPTOR CENTER — $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCitizens For Animal Protection Inc — $30,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE — $23,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS - PROVIDING ANIMAL WELFARE SERVICES — $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFamilyPoint Resources — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR PURSUIT — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Brooks FoundationWY20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Brooks Foundation · Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · Greater Houston Community Foundation · William E Weiss Foundation Inc · The Andrew Allen Charitable Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Wade Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • K9S for Warriors Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Wade Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Wade Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph