Skip to content

· Private foundation

W H and Mary Ellen Cobb Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$130k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$380kEducation$267kHousing & Shelter$75kReligion$50kPhilanthropy$50kYouth Development$45kCivil Rights$40kArts & Culture$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTMINISTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$30,000
DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER$30,000
BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES$20,000
OPPORTUNITY SCHOOL INC$15,000
AMARILLO CHILDREN'S HOME$15,000
WEST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$10,000
ST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $230k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF THE SOUTH: $10k → 10%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $20k → 14%CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $25k → 20%PRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $15k → 9%CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $20k → 20%AMARILLO CHILDREN'S HOME: $15k → 9%PRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $15k → 9%CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $20k → 20%PRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $15k → 9%PRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 9%PRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 9%PRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 9%PRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 9%PRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 9%CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $10k → 20%CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $5k → 20%CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $5k → 20%THE BRIDGE: $15k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$807k · 14 repeat orgs$215k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
10

Total granted

$807k
$165k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
+17%

Still filing today

43%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    OPPORTUNITY SCHOOL INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $135k · revenue +28%
  • CF
    CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH
    6× · 2017–2024 · $85k · revenue +12%
  • AA
    AMARILLO AREA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC
    2× · 2019–2022 · $40k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • RM
    RONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +55%
  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS OF TEXAS OKLAHOMA
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • HP
    HIGH PLAINS CHILDREN'S HOME AND FAMILY SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hendrick Home for Children
—
2
Children's Aid Society of West Tx Inc

To provide shelter, supervision, and counseling for children in crisis; to cooperate with other agencies in order to resolve problems related to the welfare of these children; to assist the families of these children in seeking possible…

Human Services
3
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
4
Central Texas Christian School Inc

To educate students with the transforming truth of christ, inspiring academic excellence, godly character, and integrity in life pursuits.

—
5
Children's Home of Lubbock and Family Service Agency Inc

Working in creative collaboration to provide quality care that transforms the lives of at-risk children and their families through the active compassion of christ.

Human Services
6
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
7
Communities in Schools of Central Texas

Communities in schools of central texas (cisct) ensures students have holistic support, removing academic and nonacademic barriers to their success in school.

Education
8
The Retreat Home for Children

Our mission is to show the love of christ to each and every child and family towhom we serve and beyond. we do this by creating a culture where the needs of children,families, and staff are seen and met in creative and innovative ways.

Crime & Legal
9
El Paso Center for Children Inc

El paso center for children, inc's purpose is to provide homes for dependent and neglected children and an array of support services for emotionally disturbed children, adolescents, and their families. the organization operates entirely in…

—
10
Communities in Schools of the South Plains Inc

To meet the needs of students in at-risk situations by improving academics, marketable skills, attendance, and behavior through the partnership of school, home, and community so that young people stay in school, learn successfully and…

Youth Development
11
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities South Texas

Keeping children near the care they need so families can get better together.

Health
12
Lubbock Family Outreach Center Inc Dba Family Guidance & Outreach Center

The Family Guidance & Outreach Center of Lubbock is dedicated to the prevention of child abuse and neglect and supporting, mentoring, and educating parents.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Bridge; the most unlike its peers is Ronald McDONALD House Charities of Greater North Texas Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OPPORTUNITY SCHOOL INC: $135,000 · OtherOPPORTUNITY SCHOOL INCIndividual grant recipient: $95,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $75,000 · OtherDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER INCWESLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $65,000 · OtherWESLEY COMMUNITY CENTERST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $50,000 · OtherST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOLBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY: $30,000 · OtherWESTMINISTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF TEXAS OKLAHOMA: $25,000 · OtherKANZA SOCIETY DBA HIGH PLAINS PUBLIC: $25,000 · Other+4 more: $52,000 · Other+4 morePRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $100,000 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHI…CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $85,000 · Human ServicesCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCHBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY…THE BRIDGE: $15,000 · Human ServicesTHE BRIDGELUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTH INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesWEST TEXAS A&M UNIV FOUNDATION: $55,000 · EducationCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF GREATER WICHITA FALLS AREA: $10,000 · EducationRONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyAMARILLO AREA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC: $40,000 · Civil RightsKIDS INC OF AMARILLO: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsAMARILLO ART CENTER ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTURN CENTER: $5,000 · Health
Other$612,000Human Services$230,000Education$65,000Philanthropy$50,000Civil Rights$40,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Arts & Culture$10,000Health$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPPORTUNITY SCHOOL INC: $135,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $100,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $85,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $75,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetWEST TEXAS A&M UNIV FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetAMARILLO AREA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC: $40,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetHIGH PLAINS CHILDREN'S HOME AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE BRIDGE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS INC OF AMARILLO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMARILLO ART CENTER ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF GREATER WICHITA FALLS AREA: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST TEXAS A&M UNIV FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMARILLO AREA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGH PLAINS CHILDREN'S HOME AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIDGE ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS INC OF AMARILLO ↗
  • Who funds AMARILLO ART CENTER ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF GREATER WICHITA FALLS AREA ↗
  • Who funds TURN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MID-CONTINENT UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amarillo Area Foundation IncTX30.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amarillo Area Foundation Inc · High Plains Christian Ministries Foundation · Mary E Bivins Foundation · Bruckner Family Foundation Inc · Amarillo Business Foundation · Mays Foundation · Dr Kent Roberts & Ilene Roberts Balliett Foundation · Ned O and Linda Miller Charitable · Kimble Foundation Trust · Cj and Syble Fowlston Charitable Trust · Josephine Anderson Charitable Trust · The Don & Sybil Harrington Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization W H and Mary Ellen Cobb Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from W H and Mary Ellen Cobb Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on W H and Mary Ellen Cobb’s filings →

    More from the funding graph