Skip to content

Texas · Private foundation

W C Payne Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
11
Grants FY2024
7
Organizations funded FY2023
57%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$48,800
Largest grant, FY2024
$500,000
Organizations funded a year
7 to 15
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
5
Total assets, FY2024
$8.9M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 57% of the organizations W C Payne Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 48% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $230k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving11$1.2M36%
FY20237$475k57%
FY20228$535k25%
FY202110$473k40%
FY202011$518k18%
FY201912$568k8%
FY201814$523k29%
FY201715$460kn/a
90% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.5MArts & Culture$979kCommunity Improvement$250kHuman Services$205kHealth$155kCrime & Legal$150kHousing & Shelter$90kEmployment$75kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 19 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 17 recipients with no EIN on record ($1.7M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget W C Payne Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWashington and Lee University: $1,148,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $355,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe Lamplighter School: $300,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetLeadership Isd Inc: $225,000 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetThe Bridge: $150,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetOklahoma Contemporary Arts Center Inc: $135,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetThe Teaching Trust: $125,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of the Greater Houston Area: $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Kids First: $95,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetOklahoma City Museum of Art Inc Fka Oklahoma City Art Museum: $88,800 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetPoston Gardens Foundation Inc: $80,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetSpecial Care Inc: $75,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCommit2dallas: $75,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Stallings Award Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetCheer 4 Your Life: $25,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetThe Jordan Spieth Family Foundation: $14,808 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBehind Every Door Ministries Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWorld Neighbors Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 18.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Byrne Family Foundation TrustTX15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Byrne Family Foundation Trust · Records Johnston Family Foundation · The Merrick Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · Meadows Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare W C Payne Foundation with peer funders

About W C Payne Foundation

How much does W C Payne Foundation give?
W C Payne Foundation reported 11 grants totaling $1,153,608 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 7 and 15 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does W C Payne Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Education (53%), Arts & Culture (21%), Community Improvement (5%).
Who are W C Payne Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Washington and Lee University ($1.1M), Teach for America Inc ($355k), The Lamplighter School ($300k).
Does W C Payne Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 57% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does W C Payne Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as W C Payne Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Byrne Family Foundation Trust, Records Johnston Family Foundation, The Merrick Foundation.
Where is W C Payne Foundation based?
W C Payne Foundation is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on W C Payne’s filings →

More from the funding graph